Liberal Forum

R. » wrote:

29 Jan 1970, 5:05 am

A craven little bootspittle we will refer to as "Tiny", in the aftermath of Jan 6th, declared his Pride in casting two votes for a guy now facing 91 counts.
He went even further in declaring the one he called OrangemanGreat "the 2nd best POTUS" of his lifetime (someone told him Reagan was the best and, by gum, Tiny  believes him).

When quizzed on the reason for his choice, he immediately reminds you that he voted for Cruz in the primary.
To further cloud the situation, Tiny has taken a firm stand behind Shorty DeSantis.....and, just as firmly, behind any Flavor of the Week for the 2024 nomination.....while THE 2ND BEST POTUS OF HIS LIFETIME IS SPRAYTANNED, RESTED AND HEAVY...as well as leading the race for the top spot on the ticket.

In honor of @Huey  declaring himself more lucid than his president, I offer this challenge as a humble plinth for the masterpiece of Reason he will mount to reconcile the apparent contradictions.


Over to you, Princess.


 

 

R. » wrote:

29 Jan 1970, 5:07 am

Huey » 31 Dec 2023, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 1:47 pm

Oh, so it doesn’t say that?  You sure you want to go there?  

@Vegas   the meltdown continues

Don't run with another diversion.

Just go over to your tribute thread and show everyone how well you cogitate..
 

 

Huey » 31 Dec 2023, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 2:00 pm

This belongs here. Stop hijacking other threads. We have had numerous times.  No need to have it again.

I have not taken a firm stand on DeSantis.  I discussed him being an option when he first declared.  After seeing him campaign I am more interested in Nikki.

'nuff said.  Argue with yourself.

Vegas » 31 Dec 2023, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 12:24 pm

Given that many of my threads have done quite well, it shouldn't be hard for you to find one. 

Granted, I admit that some were epic failures, but oh well. Many weren't.

Tempest62 » 31 Dec 2023, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 2:07 pm

Agreed. I think you’re a valuable member here. I’ve certainly learned a few things from you. Fight the good fight.

R.Suave » 31 Dec 2023, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 2:05 pm

Lying ******...

Don't presume to tell me what to do.

Every time you run your lying yap, I'll remind you of this.

**** coward.

R.Suave » 31 Dec 2023, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 2:08 pm

Name 2, **** cretin.

Tempest62 » 31 Dec 2023, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 2:07 pm

Agreed. I think you’re a valuable member here. I’ve certainly learned a few things from you. Fight the good fight.

Huey » 31 Dec 2023, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 2:12 pm

It doesn't seem to be going well for you with the others.  

Carry on.  Got a date tonight?  Or will you be here all night?

R.Suave » 31 Dec 2023, 2:36 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 2:36 pm

You're proof that any idiot can run from his lie...

Huey » 31 Dec 2023, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 2:40 pm

Post the specific lie.  You have reframed with that so many times.  I had already pointed out a few of them.  Should be on the first page.

Huey » 31 Dec 2023, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 2:00 pm

R. » wrote:

29 Jan 1970, 5:05 am

A craven little bootspittle we will refer to as "Tiny", in the aftermath of Jan 6th, declared his Pride in casting two votes for a guy now facing 91 counts.
He went even further in declaring the one he called OrangemanGreat "the 2nd best POTUS" of his lifetime (someone told him Reagan was the best and, by gum, Tiny  believes him).

When quizzed on the reason for his choice, he immediately reminds you that he voted for Cruz in the primary.
To further cloud the situation, Tiny has taken a firm stand behind Shorty DeSantis.....and, just as firmly, behind any Flavor of the Week for the 2024 nomination.....while THE 2ND BEST POTUS OF HIS LIFETIME IS SPRAYTANNED, RESTED AND HEAVY...as well as leading the race for the top spot on the ticket.

In honor of @Huey  declaring himself more lucid than his president, I offer this challenge as a humble plinth for the masterpiece of Reason he will mount to reconcile the apparent contradictions.


Over to you, Princess.


 


 

R. » wrote:

29 Jan 1970, 5:07 am

Huey » 31 Dec 2023, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 1:47 pm

Oh, so it doesn’t say that?  You sure you want to go there?  

@Vegas   the meltdown continues

Don't run with another diversion.

Just go over to your tribute thread and show everyone how well you cogitate..
 


 

This belongs here. Stop hijacking other threads. We have had numerous times.  No need to have it again.

I have not taken a firm stand on DeSantis.  I discussed him being an option when he first declared.  After seeing him campaign I am more interested in Nikki.

'nuff said.  Argue with yourself.

 

R. » wrote:

29 Jan 1970, 5:07 am

Huey » 31 Dec 2023, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 2:40 pm

Post the specific lie.  You have reframed with that so many times.  I had already pointed out a few of them.  Should be on the first page.

Little ****,

Last time you demanded to see your words reposted, you went blank in the face of them.
 

 

Huey » 31 Dec 2023, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 2:47 pm

Here I exposed your lies.

Then try 3 concise and coherent bullet point to what exactly you are claiming I am lying about.

Huey » 31 Dec 2023, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 2:11 pm

Sure, you haven't done anything on this thread other than demand that I reargue another old, stale argument. It will make laugh, MeltDown Boy.

other than demand

that I reargue

R.Suave » 31 Dec 2023, 2:56 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 2:56 pm

No I challenged you to do so, after you boasted of your acumen...

can't "reargue" what you never argued...

But you weren't asked to do so...you were challenged to reconcile.....

Huey » 31 Dec 2023, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 2:57 pm

Well, then begone with you.  Not playing your guessing game.  

You are just upset.  Grab an adult beverage and your bong.  It will make everything better.  Doesn’t your ski boot dope sound good?

R.Suave » 31 Dec 2023, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 3:03 pm

There's the "re-argue" lie...

But that's not what I'm referring to...

It's the projection lies..

Not taking a stand/making a case, not answering questions.

And your risible claim of coherence.

Huey » 31 Dec 2023, 3:14 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 3:14 pm

As I said, be specific.  I can't discuss what you refuse to post.  

It is noted that you refuse, as usual, to post specifics.  You would rather keep it ambiguous so you can wiggle out of ****.  In other words, you refuse to take a STAND.

R. » wrote:

29 Jan 1970, 5:08 am

Huey » 31 Dec 2023, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 2:57 pm

Well, then begone with you.  Not playing your guessing game.  

You are just upset.  Grab an adult beverage and your bong.  It will make everything better.  Doesn’t your ski boot dope sound good?

There's the "re-argue" lie...

But that's not what I'm referring to...

It's the projection lies..

Not taking a stand/making a case, not answering questions.

And your risible claim of coherence.
 

 

R. » wrote:

29 Jan 1970, 5:08 am

Huey » 31 Dec 2023, 3:14 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 3:14 pm

As I said, be specific.  I can't discuss what you refuse to post.  

It is noted that you refuse, as usual, to post specifics.  You would rather keep it ambiguous so you can wiggle out of ****.  In other words, you refuse to take a STAND.

I JUST **** POSTED IT, YOU **** IDIOT....EVEN TOLD YOU WHAT IT ISN'T.

 

 

Huey » 31 Dec 2023, 3:22 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 3:22 pm

Not seeing a specific instance in that post that was mentioned in the OP.

Clam down, MeltDown boy.  You are old and it is not good for your health.  You haven't smoked your bong yet.  Now post those specific examples.

@Vegas   You are gonna need more beer and popcorn.  This one is going to last a while.

Vegas » 31 Dec 2023, 4:07 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 4:07 pm

Mary only demands specific examples from others, he refuses to give them. Narcissists will be narcissists.