Liberal Forum

R.Suave » 31 Dec 2023, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 12:08 pm

This,  @ROG62  , is a "beatdown".

“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." brown's unheeded words of wisdom

R.Suave » 31 Dec 2023, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 11:28 am

A craven little bootspittle we will refer to as "Tiny",..........              
 

R.Suave » 31 Dec 2023, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 11:28 am

A craven little bootspittle we will refer to as "Tiny", in the aftermath of Jan 6th, declared his Pride in casting two votes for a guy now facing 91 counts.
He went even further in declaring the one he called OrangemanGreat "the 2nd best POTUS" of his lifetime (someone told him Reagan was the best and, by gum, Tiny  believes him).

When quizzed on the reason for his choice, he immediately reminds you that he voted for Cruz in the primary.
To further cloud the situation, Tiny has taken a firm stand behind Shorty DeSantis.....and, just as firmly, behind any Flavor of the Week for the 2024 nomination.....while THE 2ND BEST POTUS OF HIS LIFETIME IS SPRAYTANNED, RESTED AND HEAVY...as well as leading the race for the top spot on the ticket.

In honor of @Huey  declaring himself more lucid than his president, I offer this challenge as a humble plinth for the masterpiece of Reason he will mount to reconcile the apparent contradictions.

Over to you, Princess.

He went even further in declaring the one he called OrangemanGreat "the 2nd best POTUS" of his lifetime (someone told him Reagan was the best and, by gum, Tiny  believes him).

When quizzed on the reason for his choice, he immediately reminds you that he voted for Cruz in the primary.

To further cloud the situation, Tiny has taken a firm stand behind Shorty DeSantis.....and, just as firmly, behind any Flavor of the Week for the 2024 nomination.....while THE 2ND BEST POTUS OF HIS LIFETIME IS SPRAYTANNED, RESTED AND HEAVY...as well as leading the race for the top spot on the ticket.

ROG62 » 31 Dec 2023, 4:44 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 4:44 pm

If I knew WTF was going down, I may concur...but coming from you, victory dance unwarranted...

R.Suave » 31 Dec 2023, 12:25 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 12:25 pm

Your threads ALL suck...

The only way you draw interest is by dropping the name of r. suave.

“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." brown's unheeded words of wisdom

Huey » 31 Dec 2023, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 2:11 pm

Sure, you haven't done anything on this thread other than demand that I reargue another old, stale argument. It will make laugh, MeltDown Boy.

“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." brown's unheeded words of wisdom

Huey » 31 Dec 2023, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 2:12 pm

It doesn't seem to be going well for you with the others.  

Carry on.  Got a date tonight?  Or will you be here all night?

“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." brown's unheeded words of wisdom

R.Suave » 31 Dec 2023, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 3:18 pm

I JUST **** POSTED IT, YOU **** IDIOT....EVEN TOLD YOU WHAT IT ISN'T.

“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." brown's unheeded words of wisdom

Huey » 31 Dec 2023, 4:48 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 4:48 pm

That happened well before Jan 6th.

I did.  You must have some sort of point.  I seem to recall in 2020 your support was for Amy Klobochar (SP)

 lYeah, just some of your lies.  I know you don't recall, you never do, I said I was looking at Desantis because at the time he was the only serious contender.  There is a difference between firmly standing at him, or looking him as in evaluating him.

Now that we have truth posted I am sure you will take a stand.  

Acknowledge

R.Suave » 31 Dec 2023, 4:56 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 4:56 pm

Even if it all that revisionist fiction were true (a very generous courtesy in your case) it doesn't resolve the 2ndBesty Conundrum.

Huey » 31 Dec 2023, 5:03 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 5:03 pm

You will have to explain what you think the conundrum is since I just killed your revisionist fictional narrative.

SO what?  I voted for Cruz in the 2016 Primary?

SO what?  I was thinking of supporting DeSantis?

Make your case that there is a conundrum.  

I'll wait. Well, not too long.  Unlike you have things to do tonight.

That happened well before Jan 6th.

R.Suave » 31 Dec 2023, 4:49 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 4:49 pm

It's never about you "understanding"....that's a bridge too far.

“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." brown's unheeded words of wisdom

R.Suave » 31 Dec 2023, 5:12 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 5:12 pm

No...you didn't..

You lied a lot in avoiding answering how you can even consider an alternative to the 2ndBesty of your lifetime, suggesting he vaults ahead of every POTUS since - IN SPITE OF BEING RATED WORSE THAN BUCHANAN by people much smarter than you.

What difference does that make, to a Toady, Toady?

You lied a lot in avoiding answering how you can even consider an alternative to the 2ndBesty of your lifetime, suggesting he vaults ahead of every POTUS since - IN SPITE OF BEING RATED WORSE THAN BUCHANAN by people much smarter than you.

Huey » 31 Dec 2023, 5:16 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 5:16 pm

I posted that yesterday or the day before.  You were on that thread.  Next time, Karen make your point clear from the get go.  

Oh, when you the Sienna survey came out you got slammed on that talking point.

ROG62 » 31 Dec 2023, 5:14 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 5:14 pm

I wasn't here when you girls had your first spat...so the litany of ensuing pages means nothing to anyone other than you (the little bitch) , @Huey  ​​@Vegas  and possibly a few others...

AFAIC about your spat?

Huey » 31 Dec 2023, 5:16 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 5:16 pm

I posted that yesterday or the day before.  You were on that thread.  Next time, Karen make your point clear from the get go.  

Oh, when you the Sienna survey came out you got slammed on that talking point.

R.Suave » 31 Dec 2023, 5:40 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 5:40 pm

The menial yaps, the Conundrum shrugs.

R. » wrote:

29 Jan 1970, 5:10 am

Huey » 31 Dec 2023, 5:16 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 5:16 pm

I posted that yesterday or the day before.  You were on that thread.  Next time, Karen make your point clear from the get go.  

Oh, when you the Sienna survey came out you got slammed on that talking point.

That's vague.

Nice...
 

 

Huey » 31 Dec 2023, 5:43 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 5:43 pm

There is to conundrum.  None that you have posted, anyway.

Huey » 31 Dec 2023, 5:46 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 5:46 pm

Well, you have had your chance to post what this conundrum happens to be.  You can't defend position nor answer questions on a point you vaguely make.

Tomorrow I will check to see if you posted this mystery conundrum and answered these questions.  Kids and grand kids are arriving.  You have a nice, lonely New Years eve.

You will have to explain what you think the conundrum is since I just killed your revisionist fictional narrative.

SO what?  I voted for Cruz in the 2016 Primary.

SO what?  I was thinking of supporting DeSantis,

Make your case that there is a conundrum.