Kill yourselfR.Suave » 31 Dec 2023, 5:49 pm » wrote: ↑ A craven little bootspittle we will refer to as "Tiny", in the aftermath of Jan 6th, declared his Pride in casting two votes for a guy now facing 91 counts.
He went even further in declaring the one he called OrangemanGreat "the 2nd best POTUS" of his lifetime (someone told him Reagan was the best and, by gum, Tiny believes him).
When quizzed on the reason for his choice, he immediately reminds you that he voted for Cruz in the primary.
To further cloud the situation, Tiny has taken a firm stand behind Shorty DeSantis.....and, just as firmly, behind any Flavor of the Week for the 2024 nomination.....while THE 2ND BEST POTUS OF HIS LIFETIME IS SPRAYTANNED, RESTED AND HEAVY...as well as leading the race for the top spot on the ticket.
So, by your standards, I'm a ******* because I wasn't here to see what went down between you, the little bitch and @Huey @Vegas and not giving a FF?R.Suave » 31 Dec 2023, 5:41 pm » wrote: ↑ You never are, Rog.
You're just compelled to reconfirm that you're a *******.

+1000
No...you're a moron because you insist on offering your opinions on matters about which you know nothing.ROG62 » 31 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm » wrote: ↑ So, by your standards, I'm a ******* because I wasn't here to see what went down between you, the little bitch and @Huey @Vegas and not giving a FF?
You ever learn the separation difference between quantity and quality of what is left evolving naturally adapting as displaced? Universe doesn't expand in size, it increases details never duplicating results twice working the same way every thing existing changing in total sum uniquely here as individually positioned now.R. Suave » 31 Dec 2023, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑ A craven little bootspittle we will refer to as "Tiny", in the aftermath of Jan 6th, declared his Pride in casting two votes for a guy now facing 91 counts.
He went even further in declaring the one he called OrangemanGreat "the 2nd best POTUS" of his lifetime (someone told him Reagan was the best and, by gum, Tiny believes him).
When quizzed on the reason for his choice, he immediately reminds you that he voted for Cruz in the primary.
To further cloud the situation, Tiny has taken a firm stand behind Shorty DeSantis.....and, just as firmly, behind any Flavor of the Week for the 2024 nomination.....while THE 2ND BEST POTUS OF HIS LIFETIME IS SPRAYTANNED, RESTED AND HEAVY...as well as leading the race for the top spot on the ticket.
In honor of Huey declaring himself more lucid than his president, I offer this challenge as a humble plinth for the masterpiece of Reason he will mount to reconcile the apparent contradictions.
Over to you, Princess.
where did I inject my opinion in your "I'm a little bitch" pissing match?R.Suave » 31 Dec 2023, 8:04 pm » wrote: ↑ No...you're a moron because you insist on offering your opinions on matters about which you know nothing.
And BV runs…R.Suave » 31 Dec 2023, 5:49 pm » wrote: ↑ A craven little bootspittle we will refer to as "Tiny", in the aftermath of Jan 6th, declared his Pride in casting two votes for a guy now facing 91 counts.
He went even further in declaring the one he called OrangemanGreat "the 2nd best POTUS" of his lifetime (someone told him Reagan was the best and, by gum, Tiny believes him).
When quizzed on the reason for his choice, he immediately reminds you that he voted for Cruz in the primary.
To further cloud the situation, Tiny has taken a firm stand behind Shorty DeSantis.....and, just as firmly, behind any Flavor of the Week for the 2024 nomination.....while THE 2ND BEST POTUS OF HIS LIFETIME IS SPRAYTANNED, RESTED AND HEAVY...as well as leading the race for the top spot on the ticket.
Have you resolved The Conundrum?
yes I have instinctively did. All intellectual minds in every alternate reality promise tomorrow when living doesn't exceed adapting in space reproductively here now as uniquely displaced in series parallel existing results changing form shaped since combined results of previous results.
more cogent than anything we're likely to get fromNostradamus'omh » 01 Jan 2024, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑ yes I have instinctively did. All intellectual minds in every alternate reality promise tomorrow when living doesn't exceed adapting in space reproductively here now as uniquely displaced in series parallel existing results changing form shaped since combined results of previous results.
Evolving in an ongoing process that works when each detail is combined to everything done so far. Forever changing is eternally separated as balancing here now specifically to patterns of behavior(nature of the beasts) ancestral changing population left alive native to geographical point of displacement universally or ancestrally positioned.
there is no conundrum. Have you answered the questions?
Or you. Every lifetime's point of unique origin is conceived to replace their previous direct genetic lineage. offspring has 2 parents that came from 2 parents that came from 2 parents that came from 2 parents and include the siblings each generation that develop their own family lineage or not expands population exponentially more or less depending upon the last reproductions reproducing forward creating another generation gap of people never staying their fertilized cell form twice.R. Suave » 01 Jan 2024, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑ more cogent than anything we're likely to get from
hoooooeyvagina
Clearly I need to dumb this down even further.Huey » 01 Jan 2024, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑ there is no conundrum. Have you answered the questions?
You will have to explain what you think the conundrum is since I just killed your revisionist fictional narrative.
SO what? I voted for Cruz in the 2016 Primary?
SO what? I was thinking of supporting DeSantis?
Make your case that there is a conundrum.
yup, it does make perfect sense to me.R.Suave » 01 Jan 2024, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑ Clearly I need to dumb this down even further.
You have the option to get behind a fool you call "the 2ndBesty"....but you're flirting with ANY OTHER candidate....none of whom have "the 2ndBesty's" track record as POTUS.
Of course this makes perfect sense to you, 1Stands. You're a **** imbecile....but it isn't "rational".
Of course....you're an imbecile.
Rational people don't look at how evolving works as a whole balancing out outcomes as life as a whole food chain native to one atmosphere alone evolves forward in plain sight each lifetime is left adapting to the moment here at the same time regardless latitude, longitude, attitude, platitude of ideas anything else is possible and remove anyone that doesn't obey reasonable doubt set socially forward by academic interpretation, artistic impression, economic circumstances, ethical practices, political leaning, spiritual conviction people have to believe life isn't self evidently evolving as displaced reproductively present, here now.R. Suave » 01 Jan 2024, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑ Of course....you're an imbecile.
But to a rational person, it is inexplicable.
Not if you pay attention….which you don’t. Game overR.Suave » 01 Jan 2024, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑ Of course....you're an imbecile.
But to a rational person, it is inexplicable.
No, Tiny....it makes ZERO sense..
An ancestor's brain operates with 6 senses navigating between everything else adapting as alive left evolving forward now, and a social mind only obeys one track mantra all its(each ancestor's brain) previous generations believed possible as history shown what people do to defend reasonable doubt life is physically self evidently only evolving forward now.R. Suave » 01 Jan 2024, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑ No, Tiny....it makes ZERO sense..
Economists call it Utility.
R.Suave » 01 Jan 2024, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑ No, Tiny....it makes ZERO sense..
Economists call it Utility.