Liberal Forum

Two states have done it. It's possible that others may follow. 

I know you guys laugh and think it's hilarious. But have you ever considered the consequences? Yeah, I didn't think so. You all never do. 


This is the kind of **** that can lead to a legitimate civil war. You are literally telling people who they can't vote for. That's not a good thing in a democracy. Not good at all. 

I am just saying, you all may have crossed the line here. It's bad enough you pedos groom kids, now you are doing this ****? 

Yup. I mentioned exactly what you said in another thread.

They don’t care. Like children, emotion rules the day for the niggardly at the behest of their lowly masters in the media and academia.
 
 

Tempest62 » 01 Jan 2024, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2024, 11:28 am

Yup. I mentioned exactly what you said in another thread.

They don’t care. Like children, emotion rules the day for the niggardly at the behest of their lowly masters in the media and academia.

And they will always blame the Republicans/conservatives for their screw up. Always. Every. Single. Time. 

Vegas » 01 Jan 2024, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2024, 11:24 am

Two states have done it. It's possible that others may follow. 

I know you guys laugh and think it's hilarious. But have you ever considered the consequences? Yeah, I didn't think so. You all never do. 

This is the kind of **** that can lead to a legitimate civil war. You are literally telling people who they can't vote for. That's not a good thing in a democracy. Not good at all. 

I am just saying, you all may have crossed the line here. It's bad enough you pedos groom kids, now you are doing this ****?

Someone posted about this on another thread recently:

Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) issued a warning to states moving to keep former President Trump off the presidential ballot, saying the House of Representatives has the final say over whether electors from those states are certified on Jan. 6, 2025.

 “Maine, Colorado, and other states that might try to bureaucratically deny ballot access to any Republican nominee should remember the U.S. House of Representatives is the ultimate arbiter of whether to certify electors from those states,” Massie posted Friday on X, formerly Twitter. 

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4382 ... p-ballots/  
 
 

They are so afraid of Trump; they will do anything to keep him off the ballot. They know Trump is the People's choice.

Dems are bullies. Bullies can't stand it when someone stands up to them. It will be fun to watch them cry like babies when Trump is elected. I hope he slaps the **** out of them.

The bizarre thing being so many of the leftist dupes can't understand that most of the media is controlled by the government. And it is very obvious.

I think what the dems really mean that electing Trump will lead to the end of democracy is that they will do all they can to tie up the democratic process at the legislative level to stop the process.

This sets a bad Precedence but only the agenda matters to ultraliberals.

It's all BS, judges and secretary of states can't do this.

Hehehe
The squealing continues.

Vegas » 01 Jan 2024, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2024, 11:24 am

Two states have done it. It's possible that others may follow. 

I know you guys laugh and think it's hilarious. But have you ever considered the consequences? Yeah, I didn't think so. You all never do. 

This is the kind of **** that can lead to a legitimate civil war. You are literally telling people who they can't vote for. That's not a good thing in a democracy. Not good at all. 

I am just saying, you all may have crossed the line here. It's bad enough you pedos groom kids, now you are doing this ****?

Well the 14th amendment is pretty clear about insurrections. But I totally expect the Supreme Court to overrule  

Civil war?

You might find yourself quite lonely with today's disconnect.

Bidencrimefamily » 02 Jan 2024, 7:36 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2024, 7:36 am

Well the 14th amendment is pretty clear about insurrections. But I totally expect the Supreme Court to overrule

So, when exactly was Trump even charged (let alone convicted) of insurrection?

Do you not realize that Republicans are now free to do the same thing with Biden, since he too hasn't been convicted?
Are you going to claim that Trump telling the crowd to "march peacefully and patriotically to the Capitol" is even close to the harm that your diaper boy has done to the country letting in millions of illegals that haven't been vetted or screened for communicable diseases, while giving them all free food, free housing, free healthcare, free smartphones, free education, and free transportation?  Or by starting two wars?  Or by causing record inflation, and record high gas and food prices?  All while humiliating the country before the world as he stumbles all over, extends his hand to shake with ghosts, and can't put two sentences together?

Which is more serious to the thick head of a liberal like you who still plans to vote for Biden over Trump?
 

I think it is much the same as Duke University beating Bethune Cookman in a men's basketball game in Mid-November and then claiming that they are going to win a national championship. Trump was not going to win Colorado so it means nothing if he is not on the ballot.

Tempest62 » 01 Jan 2024, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2024, 11:28 am

Yup. I mentioned exactly what you said in another thread.

They don’t care. Like children, emotion rules the day for the niggardly at the behest of their lowly masters in the media and academia.

Children don't understand Consequences, or the Constitution, apparently.

Grifty is disqualifying himself, in the opinion of JUDGES, and a Secretary of State. 


 

impartialobserver » 02 Jan 2024, 12:43 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2024, 12:43 pm

I think it is much the same as Duke University beating Bethune Cookman in a men's basketball game in Mid-November and then claiming that they are going to win a national championship. Trump was not going to win Colorado so it means nothing if he is not on the ballot.

No...but the fact that a court has found him liable for 1/6, and that the determination was upheld by a state supreme court matters very much.
 

R.Suave » 02 Jan 2024, 12:54 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2024, 12:54 pm

Children don't understand Consequences, or the Constitution, apparently.

Grifty is disqualifying himself, in the opinion of JUDGES, and a Secretary of State.

No *******. He isn't. This will easily be overruled. It's just another incident of TDS. You know all about that. 

Vegas » 02 Jan 2024, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2024, 2:14 pm

No *******. He isn't. This will easily be overruled. It's just another incident of TDS. You know all about that.

In the opinion of JUDGES, he is, ****.

Level 1.

 

I haven't seen a single liberal here willing to discuss the constitutional issues yet to be decided, therefore I will reserve further comment until one states a willingness to have that discussion...including answering questions...or until the case reaches it's conclusion.