Liberal Forum

Vegas » 10 Jan 2024, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2024, 10:26 am

Yeah, I figured you wouldn't read anything. You never do.

All you do is make dumb *** threads without an inch of truth in it. 

Vegas » 10 Jan 2024, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2024, 10:26 am

Yeah, I figured you wouldn't read anything. You never do.

 

R.Suave » 10 Jan 2024, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2024, 10:28 am

 

    Hello Mary. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk
 

Vegas » 10 Jan 2024, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2024, 10:28 am

    Hello Mary. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk

******* thread as usual. And he can't back his **** up. 
 

Bidencrimefamily » 10 Jan 2024, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2024, 10:27 am

All you do is make dumb *** threads without an inch of truth in it.

You are lying about the constitution claiming that it is legal to falsely accuse someone, and you accuse me of this ^^^

God damn hypocrite. You retards are all the same. 

 

Vegas » 10 Jan 2024, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2024, 10:28 am

    Hello Mary. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk

Me - evidence

You - nothing, from an ugly chick.
 

R.Suave » 10 Jan 2024, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2024, 10:30 am

Me - evidence

You - nothing, from an ugly chick.

what word in the 14th article 3 are you having trouble understanding kid. 
 

Bidencrimefamily » 10 Jan 2024, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2024, 10:29 am

******* thread as usual. And he can't back his **** up.

You can't back up your claim about the constitution falsely accusing people. 

**** your projections and hypocrisy. 


Always accusing others of what you are guilty of. Every day, the same thing. 

Bidencrimefamily » 10 Jan 2024, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2024, 9:42 am

Well the constitution says what it says. You can't ignore the constitution. And Republicans were the ones that brought that suit to remove Trump. So no libs were involved dumb ***.

You ****, liberal idiots ignore what the Constitution says all the time.

What proof do you have that repubs were the ones that brought suit to remove Trump.  All of them are Soros connected and funded.

Prove it or you are a goddamn LIAR!!!
 

Buffalo » 10 Jan 2024, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2024, 10:53 am

You ****, liberal idiots ignore what the Constitution says all the time.

What proof do you have that repubs were the ones that brought suit to remove Trump.  All of them are Soros connected and funded.

Prove it or you are a goddamn LIAR!!!

I don’t doubt the Soros connection 

but it was republicans that brought the suit

All but two of the petitioners are Republican voters, according to the lawsuit. Wright and Castilian are unaffiliated, the lawsuit said.That's per Colorado law, Donald Sherman told Business Insider. Sherman is the executive vice president of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), a watchdog group that helped file the lawsuit."Colorado law requires that, in order for a voter to challenge the placement of the candidate in the Republican presidential primary, that they be Republicans or unaffiliated voters," Sherman said in an interview. "So in order to have standing, they had to be Republicans."

https://www.businessinsider.com/republi ... rt-2023-12
 
 

Mrkelly » 10 Jan 2024, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2024, 11:21 am

I don’t doubt the Soros connection 

but it was republicans that brought the suit

All but two of the petitioners are Republican voters, according to the lawsuit. Wright and Castilian are unaffiliated, the lawsuit said.That's per Colorado law, Donald Sherman told Business Insider. Sherman is the executive vice president of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), a watchdog group that helped file the lawsuit."Colorado law requires that, in order for a voter to challenge the placement of the candidate in the Republican presidential primary, that they be Republicans or unaffiliated voters," Sherman said in an interview. "So in order to have standing, they had to be Republicans."

https://www.businessinsider.com/republi ... rt-2023-12

Pure technicality of a **** Colorado law and the petitioners were undoubtedly RINOS!!! influenced by the liberal CREW.  The judges on the Colorado Supreme Court were ALL appointed by a dim-0-crap governor.  It was a purely politically motivated maneuver.

You are a typical ****, liberal idiot to think this was anywhere close to being legitimate and not illegal election interference.  
 

Buffalo » 10 Jan 2024, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2024, 12:49 pm

Pure technicality of a **** Colorado law and the petitioners were undoubtedly RINOS!!! influenced by the liberal CREW.  The judges on the Colorado Supreme Court were ALL appointed by a dim-0-crap governor.  It was a purely politically motivated maneuver.

You are a typical ****, liberal idiot to think this was anywhere close to being legitimate and not illegal election interference.

Soros is funding Republicans now according to the dip **** right wing. 
 

Buffalo » 10 Jan 2024, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2024, 12:49 pm

Pure technicality of a **** Colorado law and the petitioners were undoubtedly RINOS!!! influenced by the liberal CREW.  The judges on the Colorado Supreme Court were ALL appointed by a dim-0-crap governor.  It was a purely politically motivated maneuver.

You are a typical ****, liberal idiot to think this was anywhere close to being legitimate and not illegal election interference.

Rinos you mean those that still have morals. 

Bidencrimefamily » 10 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm

Soros is funding Republicans now according to the dip **** right wing.

Rinos and anyone that supports his one world government agenda and the destruction of America.  Sorryass is an evil ****. You must suck his old dick!!!
 

Buffalo » 10 Jan 2024, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2024, 12:49 pm

Pure technicality of a **** Colorado law and the petitioners were undoubtedly RINOS!!! influenced by the liberal CREW.  The judges on the Colorado Supreme Court were ALL appointed by a dim-0-crap governor.  It was a purely politically motivated maneuver.

You are a typical ****, liberal idiot to think this was anywhere close to being legitimate and not illegal election interference.

haven’t said **** about it

just pointing out that you are wrong

A majority of republicans did bring the suit

even they want tRump off of the ballot   
 

Bidencrimefamily » 10 Jan 2024, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2024, 12:51 pm

Rinos you mean those that still have morals.

If one still claims to be a dim-0-crap or rino, you will be on the wrong side of history. In my book you are a traitor to our country, a war monger, and against the decency that used to be this country. You are in favor of dumbing down the children and for pedephilia. You think lying and plagiarism are ok and it's my way or the highway no other ideas are acceptable. If you still claim to be a dim-0-crap you think that jailing your opponents or removing them from the ballot is ok, you are a goddamn communist. I challenge anyone who still claims to be a dim-0-crap to take into your homes some illegals. One last thing: if you're not for voter integrity you might need to move to a country that has no voting. Cali and NY think it's ok to let illegals vote, that is not going to fly in America and if they do those states should not be counted. I am outraged about what the communist dim-0-craps and their rino bootlickers have done to this country. If you're still a dim-0-crap then go live in a communist country for a while and see how you like it.

I'm all in for Texas secession!!!
 

Mrkelly » 10 Jan 2024, 12:53 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2024, 12:53 pm

haven’t said **** about it

just pointing out that you are wrong

A majority of republicans did bring the suit

even they want tRump off of the ballot 

Those you refer to are NOT the majority!!!  Nationwide, Trump leads braindead biden in every major poll by as much as 7%.
 

maineman » 02 Jan 2024, 5:12 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2024, 5:12 pm

That's your opinion.  The Constitution tells us who we can and cannot vote for.  As much as you might want to, you cannot vote for someone who was not born in the US.  You cannot vote for someone who has not reached the age of 35.  And you cannot vote for someone who led an insurrection.  There are plenty of other folks who you CAN vote for... pick one of them.

The civil war was an insurrection. Explain how a 3 hour unarmed riot instigated by the FBI and capital police is an insurrection?

Buffalo » 10 Jan 2024, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2024, 1:02 pm

Those you refer to are NOT the majority!!!  Nationwide, Trump leads braindead biden in every major poll by as much as 7%.

  don’t care 

point was those republicans don’t like tRump

you was wrong 

 

R.Suave » 10 Jan 2024, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2024, 10:25 am

Lying coward.

I agree with Vegas. You are either a ******* or refuse to entertain the fact your are wrong and pushing a false premise.