Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Hey Libtards. About this whole omitting Trump from the ballot thing...
Hey Libtards. About this whole omitting Trump from the ballot thing...
By Vegas
1 Jan 2024 10:24 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
10 Jan 2024 12:43 pm
RebelGator » 10 Jan 2024, 1:38 pm » wrote: ↑ I wouldn't, because it's obvious you care more for the progressive left than you do for the country.
I think your impression of me is incorrect.
10 Jan 2024 12:46 pm
maineman » 10 Jan 2024, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Anyone who watched TV on 1/6/21 saw an angry mob disrupt the scheduled Constitutional process leading to the peaceful transfer of power. While the term "insurrection" is not explicitly defined by federal law, courts and legal scholars generally interpret it as a violent uprising or organized resistance against the government or its regulations. Insurrection often involves acts intended to overthrow, disrupt, or challenge the authority of the United States or impede the enforcement of federal laws. That is exactly what the MAGA mob was trying to do... they wanted to disrupt the certification of the results of the Electoral College... and did, in fact, stave that certification off for several hours.
Is there something factually inaccurate about the above paragraph?
First the disruption of a peaceful transfer of power is a lie. the Electoral Count act of 1887 was being invoked. This would lead to the election practices of several states to be investigate. Something all Trump supporters wanted to happen. Anyone who watched TV? Now that is funny. Probably more fiction pushed on TV that any other form of media. The only people who had reason to disrupt what was happening would be the deep state (FBI/DOJ) and leftist politicians.
10 Jan 2024 12:47 pm
R.Suave » 10 Jan 2024, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes...there was a "trial".
And yes, there was due process...
Now take that grade school **** and get the **** lost.
Really? please give me the date where there was a jury trial that Trumps attorneys got to present Trumps side?
10 Jan 2024 12:53 pm
It was before a judge.EDC4ALL! » 10 Jan 2024, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Really? please give me the date where there was a jury trial that Trumps attorneys got to present Trumps side?
Now take your ignorance elsewhere.
10 Jan 2024 12:56 pm
FredH » 10 Jan 2024, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑ First the disruption of a peaceful transfer of power is a lie. the Electoral Count act of 1887 was being invoked. This would lead to the election practices of several states to be investigate. Something all Trump supporters wanted to happen. Anyone who watched TV? Now that is funny. Probably more fiction pushed on TV that any other form of media. The only people who had reason to disrupt what was happening would be the deep state (FBI/DOJ) and leftist politicians.
Hang Mike Pence
Hang Mike Pence
Hang Mike Pence
Hang Mike Pence
Hang Mike Pence
Hang Mike Pence
Hang Mike Pence
Hang Mike Pence
Hang Mike Pence
Hang Mike Pence
Hang Mike Pence
Hang Mike Pence
Hang Mike Pence
Hang Mike Pence
10 Jan 2024 12:57 pm
The Colorado Supreme Court considered arguments from Trump's attorneys
10 Jan 2024 12:59 pm
The list of amici curae was 4 pages long.maineman » 10 Jan 2024, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑ The Colorado Supreme Court considered arguments from Trump's attorneys
10 Jan 2024 12:59 pm
FredH » 10 Jan 2024, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑ First the disruption of a peaceful transfer of power is a lie. the Electoral Count act of 1887 was being invoked. This would lead to the election practices of several states to be investigate. Something all Trump supporters wanted to happen. Anyone who watched TV? Now that is funny. Probably more fiction pushed on TV that any other form of media. The only people who had reason to disrupt what was happening would be the deep state (FBI/DOJ) and leftist politicians.
Oh, and mobs don't get to break into the nation's capitol and invoke Federal Laws.
10 Jan 2024 1:02 pm
Right, it takes election fraud for that to happen.maineman » 10 Jan 2024, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh, and mobs don't get to break into the nation's capitol and invoke Federal Laws.
10 Jan 2024 1:02 pm
****, liberal, LYING idiot!!!
The Senate cleared him of that charge!!!
https://www.dw.com/en/donald-trump-clea ... ol-riots/a
Senate votes to acquit Trump for role in Capitol attack | PBS NewsHour
Donald Trump acquitted by Senate in second impeachment trial (cnbc.com)
Senate Acquits Trump of ‘Incitement of Insurrection’ in Impeachment Trial (usnews.com)
10 Jan 2024 1:05 pm
Vegas » 10 Jan 2024, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑ Again, he didn't order anything. His tweets made that clear. You keep posting hearsay articles. I keep referring to what Trump did and said. I couldn't care less about what other articles say. I only care about what was clear about what he said and did. Insurrection leaders don't tweet for peace and defend law enforcement against rioters.
Your articles are meaningless.
his pardons makes it perfectly clear about everything. people who want peace don't rile up an angry mob and tell them the vice president did not do what they wanted.
10 Jan 2024 1:13 pm
Mobs can't invoke it for any reason. The law doesn't work that way.
10 Jan 2024 1:14 pm
Boy, that's a **** stretch to come up with that ****...jerrab » 10 Jan 2024, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑ his pardons makes it perfectly clear about everything. people who want peace don't rile up an angry mob and tell them the vice president did not do what they wanted.
Trump promises to pardon those whose rights have been illegally violated. Their right of free speech, right of due process, right to a speedy trial, right to an attorney,, cruel and unusual punishment...
10 Jan 2024 1:31 pm
Apparently you believe that matters...Buffalo » 10 Jan 2024, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑ ****, liberal, LYING idiot!!!
The Senate cleared him of that charge!!!
https://www.dw.com/en/donald-trump-clea ... ol-riots/a
Senate votes to acquit Trump for role in Capitol attack | PBS NewsHour
Donald Trump acquitted by Senate in second impeachment trial (cnbc.com)
Senate Acquits Trump of ‘Incitement of Insurrection’ in Impeachment Trial (usnews.com)
10 Jan 2024 1:36 pm
Apparently you don't...
10 Jan 2024 1:43 pm
10 Jan 2024 1:44 pm
freedom of speech does not include attacking cops.Buffalo » 10 Jan 2024, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Boy, that's a **** stretch to come up with that ****...
Trump promises to pardon those whose rights have been illegally violated. Their right of free speech, right of due process, right to a speedy trial, right to an attorney,, cruel and unusual punishment...
freedom of speech does not include threatening the vice president.
freedom of speech does not include vandalizing the capitol.
10 Jan 2024 1:45 pm
RebelGator » 10 Jan 2024, 1:38 pm » wrote: ↑ I wouldn't, because it's obvious you care more for the progressive left than you do for the country.
you care about trump and only trump
10 Jan 2024 1:46 pm
Buffalo » 10 Jan 2024, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Boy, that's a **** stretch to come up with that ****...
Trump promises to pardon those whose rights have been illegally violated. Their right of free speech, right of due process, right to a speedy trial, right to an attorney,, cruel and unusual punishment...
show where any of those were denied an attorney.
10 Jan 2024 1:47 pm
The VAST MAJORITY of those protesters are guilty of NONE of that!!! But that doesn't matter to you ****, liberal idiots!!!jerrab » 10 Jan 2024, 2:44 pm » wrote: ↑ freedom of speech does not include attacking cops.
freedom of speech does not include threatening the vice president.
freedom of speech does not include vandalizing the capitol.
Who is online
In total there are 2069 users online :: 11 registered, 12 bots, and 2046 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, roadkill, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, RebelGator, Beekeeper, jerra b, SouthernFried, Cannonpointer, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101
Bots: ADmantX, proximic, YandexBot, CensysInspect, CriteoBot, DuckDuckBot, Applebot, Mediapartners-Google, Googlebot, facebookexternalhit, bingbot, curl/7