Liberal Forum

EDC4ALL! » 11 Jan 2024, 3:45 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jan 2024, 3:45 pm

So. A bunch of lefty prosecutors got together with some lefty Judges, had a sham trial, didn't allow the person on trial to attend or present lawyers, formed a bias opinion based on their hatred for the Orange man, and have the balls to contradict the highest law enforcement agency in the land, that found the was NO **** INSERRECTION!!!!!!!

https://docs.house.gov/meetings/GO/GO00 ... -SD005.pdf

Where the **** was the DUE PROCESS???????

What is a violation of due process of law?
It is a violation of due process for a state to enforce a judgment against a party to a proceeding without having given him an opportunity to be heard sometime before final judgment is entered.

Acknowledge that you are a lying ****.

"After permitting President Trump and the Colorado Republican State Central Committee (“CRSCC”; collectively, “Intervenors”) to intervene in the action below, the district court conducted a five-day trial. The court found by clear and convincing evidence that President Trump engaged in insurrection as those terms are used in Section Three. Anderson v. Griswold, No. 23CV32577, ¶¶ 241, 298 (Dist. Ct., City & Cnty. of Denver, Nov. 17, 2023)."

https://ndnation.com/boards/showpost.ph ... 814;d=this

Buffalo » 11 Jan 2024, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jan 2024, 9:56 am

4 goddamn rinos brought the suit in Colorado and dim-0-craps on the CO SC ruled against Trump!!!  YOU are lying as if all repulsives are against Trump and that is not true.  The vast majority of repulsives support Trump's reelection, stupid!!!  As do more and more blacks, hispanics and even dim-0-craps because they can see what a **** mess braindead biden and his merry administration of queers, trannys and *** have made of America.

Buffy,

You're full of ****.
 

Buffalo » 11 Jan 2024, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jan 2024, 9:56 am

4 goddamn rinos brought the suit in Colorado and dim-0-craps on the CO SC ruled against Trump!!!  YOU are lying as if all repulsives are against Trump and that is not true.  The vast majority of repulsives support Trump's reelection, stupid!!!  As do more and more blacks, hispanics and even dim-0-craps because they can see what a **** mess braindead biden and his merry administration of queers, trannys and *** have made of America.

trump is the one who treated them unfairly. he took advantage of them.

BuckNaked » 11 Jan 2024, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jan 2024, 11:32 am

don’t count your chickens

You must be confident of dim-0-crap vote fraud and election interference...
 

Buffalo » 12 Jan 2024, 6:33 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 6:33 am

You must be confident of dim-0-crap vote fraud and election interference...

Why not it worked in 2020 

BuckNaked » 12 Jan 2024, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 9:26 am

Why not it worked in 2020

  Have any proof?
Trump needs it.
He doesn't.
 

Squatchman » 12 Jan 2024, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 9:28 am

  Have any proof?
Trump needs it.
He doesn't.

Proof of what?
 

maineman » 10 Jan 2024, 8:11 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2024, 8:11 pm

should I call the waaaaaaaaaaaaaambulance or do you have it on speed dial?

There was no cheating in key swing states...just unproven allegations thereof.

That comment proves you are a moron. Did the read the Congressional record?

jerrab » 11 Jan 2024, 6:30 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jan 2024, 6:30 pm

trump is the one who treated them unfairly. he took advantage of them.

Can't wait to see morons like you downrange. When chaos begins you retards better take cover.

FredH » 12 Jan 2024, 12:58 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 12:58 pm

That comment proves you are a moron. Did the read the Congressional record?

I did...and noted that majorities in both chambers did not see fit to invoke the Electoral Count Act of 1877.

BuckNaked » 12 Jan 2024, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 9:26 am

Why not it worked in 2020

will you stop saying that? you're gonna jinx it. They may pull off another steal.!!!
 

R.Suave » 11 Jan 2024, 5:24 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jan 2024, 5:24 pm

No..a bunch of Republicans sued the Colorado Secretary of State..

**** idiot.

Do you know who Jay Sekulow is?

**** moron.

CREW is not a bunch of Republicans you idiot. You tards will fall for anything soooo funny. Yes I know who Jay Sekulow is, relevance?

maineman » 12 Jan 2024, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 1:24 pm

I did...and noted that majorities in both chambers did not see fit to invoke the Electoral Count Act of 1877.

You stupid **** the objections to the electors is the Electoral count act of 1887! That is the process. If the leftards and Rinos were not all as **** in the head as you are then the electors from the states with sketchy election practices would have been sent back, their elections investigated and possibly the states in question would have had electors disqualified. They held the election results up for a month over "chad" in the Gore Bush election. Why not the 10 days asked for in the 2020 election?

maineman » 10 Jan 2024, 8:09 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2024, 8:09 pm

so...a majority of both houses did NOT choose to question the slates of electors?  hmmmmm

game set match

The point being you ******* the majority did not see a fair election as important.  And the riot changed the minds of the 7 senators objecting to not do so. Wonder why? Or the FBI/McConnel persuaded them somehow.
 

FredH » 12 Jan 2024, 1:28 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 1:28 pm

CREW is not a bunch of Republicans you idiot. You tards will fall for anything soooo funny. Yes I know who Jay Sekulow is, relevance?

CREW is not among the petitioners, Moron..

Yes I know who Jay Sekulow is, relevance?

He petitioned the Court to be admitted to the hearing..

FredH » 12 Jan 2024, 1:36 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 1:36 pm

The point being you ******* the majority did not see a fair election as important.  And the riot changed the minds of the 7 senators objecting to not do so. Wonder why?

No, *******..

They saw that Grifty had disqualified himself..
 

R.Suave » 12 Jan 2024, 1:52 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 1:52 pm

CREW is not among the petitioners, Moron..

He petitioned the Court to be admitted to the hearing..

So what if he petitioned the Court to be admitted to the hearing. CREW is who brought the suit in Colorado.

https://www.citizensforethics.org/news/ ... ent-trial/

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=hCREW+colorad ... ase&ia=web

Stupid **** and about Jay, do you have a link that covers his part in this passion play?

R.Suave » 12 Jan 2024, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 1:53 pm

No, *******..

They saw that Grifty had disqualified himself..

How? Because of a three hour riot instigated by the FBI?

maineman » 10 Jan 2024, 4:55 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2024, 4:55 pm

congress debated as to whether they would invoke the Electoral Count Act of 1887.  They ultimately did not do so or need to do so.  As Ms Lofgren from California pointed out, "under the ECA, if a Governor certifies a slate of electors and there are no competing slates in that State, the Governor-certified must be counted. Today, every single slate of electors won by Joe Biden, or won by Donald Trump, got their Governor’s certification. Not a single State submitted a competing slate. There is no dispute to resolve."

Not true at all. *******.

FredH » 12 Jan 2024, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 2:22 pm

How? Because of a three hour riot instigated by the FBI?

Why did Grifty urge his brain dead minions to walk into it?