Liberal Forum

Vegas » 02 Jan 2024, 9:26 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2024, 9:26 pm

What do you mean?

your post.

-------------------------------------------------------


I know you guys laugh and think it's hilarious. But have you ever considered the consequences? Yeah, I didn't think so. You all never do. 

 

Vegas » 02 Jan 2024, 9:28 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2024, 9:28 pm

Him leading this 'insurrection' has never been proved. You want it to be true, your media wants it to be true, but it is speculation and theories. Nothing more.

I saw it happen on my television screen
 

Vegas » 02 Jan 2024, 9:26 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2024, 9:26 pm

What do you mean?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... tsColorado supreme court justices face death threats after Trump rulingReport finds ‘significant violent rhetoric’ against justices and Democrats online after ruling to exclude Trump from ballotLauren ArataniThu 21 Dec 2023 09.06 EST

•  
•  
•  

Justices on the Colorado supreme court are receiving a barrage of death threats after it ruled to exclude Donald Trump from the state’s presidential ballot next year because of his attempts to cause insurrection.A report compiled by Advance Democracy, a non-partisan non-profit organization, said there was “significant violent rhetoric” against the justices and Democrats on social media, according to NBC News.Some of the worst of it was posted on fringe websites, including one post that said “behead judges” and “slam dunk a judge’s baby into the trash can”.Another post on The Donald, a pro-Trump forum where a Trump supporter once publicly bragged about his involvement with the January 6 insurrection and was arrested as a result, said “this ends when we kill these ****”.
 

Vegas » 01 Jan 2024, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2024, 11:24 am

Two states have done it. It's possible that others may follow. 

I know you guys laugh and think it's hilarious. But have you ever considered the consequences? Yeah, I didn't think so. You all never do. 

This is the kind of **** that can lead to a legitimate civil war. You are literally telling people who they can't vote for. That's not a good thing in a democracy. Not good at all. 

I am just saying, you all may have crossed the line here. It's bad enough you pedos groom kids, now you are doing this ****?

I'm just tired of Trump pitching about everything. The dude reminds me of my ex wife 

Vegas » 01 Jan 2024, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2024, 11:24 am

Two states have done it. It's possible that others may follow. 

I know you guys laugh and think it's hilarious. But have you ever considered the consequences? Yeah, I didn't think so. You all never do. 

This is the kind of **** that can lead to a legitimate civil war. You are literally telling people who they can't vote for. That's not a good thing in a democracy. Not good at all. 

I am just saying, you all may have crossed the line here. It's bad enough you pedos groom kids, now you are doing this ****?

in other words a call to domestic terrorism.

maineman » 02 Jan 2024, 10:48 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2024, 10:48 pm

I saw it happen on my television screen

Yeah your own eyes seeing it doesn't count. 

maineman » 02 Jan 2024, 10:48 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2024, 10:48 pm

I saw it happen on my television screen

fox ordered them to watch reruns of gilligan's island that day. for 3 hours. 

a three hour tour.

R.Suave » 02 Jan 2024, 9:42 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2024, 9:42 pm

What "right" are you referring to?

There is an open question to you from me.  Once you answer that question, I'll get back to you.

Play by my rules or don't play.

ConsRule » 03 Jan 2024, 7:17 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2024, 7:17 am

There is an open question to you from me.  Once you answer that question, I'll get back to you.

Play by my rules or don't play.

You don't play by your rules, **** coward.

There's no way I'm in your debt.

Run.

R.Suave » 03 Jan 2024, 7:21 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2024, 7:21 am

You don't play by your rules, **** coward.

There's no way I'm in your debt.

Run.

Go back through the thread (your mommy can show you how).  You will see I have answered questions quickly and directly.  You, not so much.  The choice is yours...if you want to have a discussion with me, you will answer questions...period...full stop.
 

Vegas » 02 Jan 2024, 9:28 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2024, 9:28 pm

Him leading this 'insurrection' has never been proved. You want it to be true, your media wants it to be true, but it is speculation and theories. Nothing more.

Him leading this 'insurrection' has never been proved

that is EXACTLY what a Colorado court concluded and its Supreme Court upheld.

Level 1 fail.

**** moron.

ConsRule » 03 Jan 2024, 7:23 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2024, 7:23 am

Go back through the thread (your mommy can show you how).  You will see I have answered questions quickly and directly.  You, not so much.  The choice is yours...if you want to have a discussion with me, you will answer questions...period...full stop.

And now I have to chase some ****?

I don't blame you for running....it's either that or humiliation....you're helpless....impotent.


 

R.Suave » 03 Jan 2024, 7:27 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2024, 7:27 am

And now I have to chase some ****?

I don't blame you for running....it's either that or humiliation....you're helpless....impotent.

I'm not the one scared to answer a simple question and it's not my fault you're too **** lazy to read and keep up with the thread.
 

ConsRule » 03 Jan 2024, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2024, 8:06 am

I'm not the one scared to answer a simple question and it's not my fault you're too **** lazy to read and keep up with the thread.

I asked yet another simple question.

Predictably, I have no answer. 

I never get an answer, but you have so much to say about it..

ConsRule » 02 Jan 2024, 4:24 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2024, 4:24 pm

See...you can't even bring yourself to answer the question of "Do you want to have a discussion" even when the parameters are "a low bar". By the way, the reason I set the parameters of your thoughts or a summation of the thoughts of experts is there have been stories/articles on the topic of disqualifying Trump for at least 7-8 months.  I don't expect someone (even you) to be able to quickly find a link to something heard or read in June of last year.

Like I said, I haven't found a liberal here willing to have a discussion...which includes answering questions.

What a ****!

maineman » 02 Jan 2024, 5:12 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2024, 5:12 pm

That's your opinion.  The Constitution tells us who we can and cannot vote for.  As much as you might want to, you cannot vote for someone who was not born in the US.  You cannot vote for someone who has not reached the age of 35.  And you cannot vote for someone who led an insurrection.  There are plenty of other folks who you CAN vote for... pick one of them.

You LOVE proving you are an IDIOT, don't you???

Fact is, YOU CAN vote for someone NOT born in the US of A!! There is no "natural born" requirement for EITHER a US Congressperson, or a US SENATOR, you stupid **** MORON!!! And even a few states have NO prohibitions on foreign born people from holding office. 

Article I, Section 2, Clause 2:

No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the Age of twenty five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen.

SO SHUT THE **** UP GROOMER AND PEDOPHILE!!

R.Suave » 03 Jan 2024, 8:13 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2024, 8:13 am

I asked yet another simple question.

Predictably, I have no answer. 

I never get an answer, but you have so much to say about it..

That's because you ignore questions asked and go straight to asking, usually off topic, questions.

I'll say it one last time, if you want to have a conversation with me you will answer questions. Your questions will not be answered until that happens.

It really is that simple.  Well, it's simple for an adult.

maineman » 02 Jan 2024, 5:12 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2024, 5:12 pm

That's your opinion.  The Constitution tells us who we can and cannot vote for.  As much as you might want to, you cannot vote for someone who was not born in the US.  You cannot vote for someone who has not reached the age of 35.  And you cannot vote for someone who led an insurrection.  There are plenty of other folks who you CAN vote for... pick one of them.

Cite please.

Here is a link to the Constitution, I'll even make it easier for you.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/index.html

 
 

ConsRule » 03 Jan 2024, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2024, 8:21 am

That's because you ignore questions asked and go straight to asking, usually off topic, questions.

I'll say it one last time, if you want to have a conversation with me you will answer questions. Your questions will not be answered until that happens.

It really is that simple.  Well, it's simple for an adult.

You're lying.

You made reference to "rights".

I asked you to specify (you'll note that I did not open with a preamble of ****, as is your wont).

You went into your Funky Chicken.
 

ConsRule » 03 Jan 2024, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2024, 8:21 am

That's because you ignore questions asked and go straight to asking, usually off topic, questions.

I'll say it one last time, if you want to have a conversation with me you will answer questions. Your questions will not be answered until that happens.

It really is that simple.  Well, it's simple for an adult.

 

it's Deja Vu all over again....