No, Tiny..Huey » 02 Jan 2024, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑ Actually, as I said, I already answered the question you asked. It is in the citation you refuse to read.
Repost for @R. SuaveHuey » 02 Jan 2024, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑ No, you are really talking about CNN's uniformed prattle because that's where the information is from.
Repost
ANd more
:After years of increases, the rate of firearm-related homicides in the United States decreased in 2022, according to data published Thursday by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.This is the first time the national firearm homicide rate has fallen since a sharp increase was recorded from 2019 to 2020, amid the Covid-19 pandemic, according to the CDC.Between 2019 and 2020, the overall firearm homicide rate increased by about 35%, from 4.4 deaths per 100,000 people nationwide in 2019 to 5.8 in 2020. That rate was the highest it had been relative to the previous 20 years, only to increase again in 2021 to 6.3 deaths per 100,000 people.
https://www.cnn.com/2023/10/20/health/f ... index.html
From your primary source. You may go now. You an strike thru all you want and call CNN uniformed prattle but the facts remain the same.
Run along, Gunophobe.
Given your Issues, I'm not surprised I must repeat this.Huey » 02 Jan 2024, 1:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Repost for @R. Suave
Why you running, ya whiny little bitch? You are caught in another lie.
LMFAO!!!!Bidencrimefamily » 01 Jan 2024, 5:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Detroit records 252 homicides in 2023, lowest since 1966







R.Suave » 02 Jan 2024, 1:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Given your Issues, I'm not surprised I must repeat this.
You must stipulate to objective facts EXPLICITLY, not by "commission".
Acknowledge.
Yes, I am.Huey » 02 Jan 2024, 1:22 pm » wrote: ↑ LMAO! You are in no position to presume I will do anything you demand. If I have already posted the information, you reply to it, and you line it out, that's on you.
Plus, I have acknowledged the increase you want to talk about on any number of occasions when I post about this.
Yes, you are unable to make a case or take a stand.
That explains why you respond to questions by quoting me.
When I posted the citation it was stipulated to. Only an idiot would demand the answer again.R.Suave » 02 Jan 2024, 1:31 pm » wrote: ↑ That explains why you respond to questions by quoting me.
There is no case or stand to take, only a fact to which you need to explicitly stipulate.
**** YOUR UNION PROTECTED SKILLED LABOR FORCE!GHETTOBLASTER » 02 Jan 2024, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Well.......if a President endorsed a constructive and productive economic policy [like kicking out millions of Illegal Aliens in our skilled labor force]...then that might make a dent in the crime that's directly connected to poverty.....![]()
That's how a President could be given some credit for a crime decrease.
Handing everyone $1400 and then presiding over massive inflation afterwards failed to work.
well then? don't threaten - just go.Huey » 02 Jan 2024, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑ When I posted the citation it was stipulated to. Only an idiot would demand the answer again.
So, if you got nothing but this BS, meaning you have nothing else to say, I'm done.
No....which is why you pull that ****** crap.Huey » 02 Jan 2024, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑ When I posted the citation it was stipulated to. Only an idiot would demand the answer again.
So, if you got nothing but this BS, meaning you have nothing else to say, I'm done.
Hi spammer? how are you today? hahaha
Huey » 02 Jan 2024, 2:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Again, you initiate a conversation with me yet I am the spammer. Funny how your mind works.

impartialobserver » 02 Jan 2024, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑ This is encouraging news but it leaves out a lot of context. First, Detroit has lost population so less murders is likely. Second, Biden has zero to do with this.
Oddly enough, you run your penis flytrap without any proof at all.R.Suave » 02 Jan 2024, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑ But it DOES equate to considerably higher rates of firearms related homicides and suicides.
Oddly enough.
Have you forgotten what *** you are talking to?