it was totally specific, ****...R.Suave » 03 Jan 2024, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑ You never specified.
But I'd be happy to, if you insist.
Run, Rog...go find a meme.
You cannot distinguish between a male and a female unless the person gives you a program.
Whereas you do by sense of taste...Cannonpointer » 03 Jan 2024, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑ You cannot distinguish between a male and a female unless the person gives you a program.
Why would ANYONE care what you think, ruh tard?
Sure..
Here we go, @NEILCAR - you are about to be initiated into this ***'s world.
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!R.Suave » 03 Jan 2024, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑ curling up in the fetal position, whimpering for his mama?
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!R.Suave » 03 Jan 2024, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑ Do you know how social scientists estimate the number of guns in private hands in a state?
I once debated this ***. He made an affirmative claim that a fellow had never said a thing which I had attributed to the fellow.RebelGator » 03 Jan 2024, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑ usa360 wants to have a serious debate with you.....nothing like destroying all the good work the Suicide Prevention Hotline has done in the last 50 years.
He should have debated - it cost him bidencrimefamility's and Rick O'swaves votes.
Rational ideas only specify specific parts of the whole to characterize results to specified outcomes that happen over and over while with everything here doesn't stay total sum present forward now as a whole equal total sum of all universal parts present as geographically positioned here as individually displaced in series parallel evolving ancestors changing population one at a time from inception to conceiving next generations up to dead still occupying space as decomposing results.
You wish, little queer.
A dictionary is NOT a biology reference....it's a Freudian slip.Cannonpointer » 03 Jan 2024, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑ You wish, little queer.
I base it on biology. Not testimony.
But then, I do not flee objective standards, as you do, fruitcake.
Once you show where I referenced a dictionary, this^ plea for masculine attention will appear less irrelevant.R.Suave » 03 Jan 2024, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑ A dictionary is NOT a biology reference....it's a Freudian slip.
No, no, no....Cannonpointer » 03 Jan 2024, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑ Once you show where I referenced a dictionary, this^ plea for masculine attention will appear less irrelevant.
So that is a no, then.
My narratives are far more credible than yours....you even lie to yourselfCannonpointer » 03 Jan 2024, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑ So that is a no, then.
You CANNOT. And this WAS just a desperate plea for masculine attention.
Thanks for signifying, fruitcake.
If only your facts were credible, fruitcake.R.Suave » 03 Jan 2024, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑ My narratives are far more credible than yours....you even lie to yourself
A dictionary is to vocabulary evolving as is biology is to reproductions appear as conceived living eternally separated as sharing space specifically here one at a time now.R. Suave » 03 Jan 2024, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑ A dictionary is NOT a biology reference....it's a Freudian slip.