Liberal Forum

R.Suave » 03 Jan 2024, 5:29 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2024, 5:29 pm

These are stupid ****.

Happy Entrapment Day.
 

Cedar » 06 Jan 2024, 3:26 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jan 2024, 3:26 pm

Happy Entrapment Day.

Stupid as ****.
 

R.Suave » 06 Jan 2024, 3:28 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jan 2024, 3:28 pm

Stupid as ****.

I have already educated you today on what is and isn't an insurrection.

 

Huey » 06 Jan 2024, 3:48 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jan 2024, 3:48 pm

I have already educated you today on what is and isn't an insurrection.

How have you done so?

It's not as if you understand the test applied by the Colorado courts.

Ask me why...
 

R.Suave » 06 Jan 2024, 3:51 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jan 2024, 3:51 pm

How have you done so?

It's not as if you understand the test applied by the Colorado courts.

Ask me why...

I don't give a **** about the civil proceeding in CO that was a bench trial meaning no jury, no defense, of no course no conviction, etc etc etc.  

Little Nappy, (as in Napoleon) I don't answer demands from you.  Make your own case.

Huey » 06 Jan 2024, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jan 2024, 3:54 pm

I don't give a **** about the civil proceeding in CO that was a bench trial meaning no jury, no defense, of no course no conviction, etc etc etc.  

Little Nappy, (as in Napoleon) I don't answer demands from you.  Make your own case.

of no course no conviction, etc etc etc.  

Do you understand why?

Do you understand why it's irrelevant?

Run hard, Twatty.

R.Suave » 06 Jan 2024, 3:55 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jan 2024, 3:55 pm

Do you understand why?

Do you understand why it's irrelevant?

Run hard, Twatty.

Dum Dum, I know it is a civil proceeding.  We have discussed this a couple of weeks ago.  And remember, the burden of evidence in a civil proceeding is MUCH LOWER than a criminal one

So stop moving the goal posts, Lil Nappy.

Huey » 06 Jan 2024, 4:04 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jan 2024, 4:04 pm

Dum Dum, I know it is a civil proceeding.  We have discussed this a couple of weeks ago.  And remember, the burden of evidence in a civil proceeding is MUCH LOWER than a criminal one

So stop moving the goal posts, Lil Nappy.

Shhhhh.

Pay attention.

Civil proceedings don't end with a conviction.

Nod.

A conviction is not required under Sec 3.

Nod.

R.Suave » 06 Jan 2024, 4:31 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jan 2024, 4:31 pm

Shhhhh.

Pay attention.

Civil proceedings don't end with a conviction.

Nod.

A conviction is not required under Sec 3.

Nod.

No **** on the conviction.  Is it sinking in yet?

And lawyers argue that only congress can determine is someone is ineligible under that provision?

 

BuckNaked » 06 Jan 2024, 8:17 am » wrote: ↑

06 Jan 2024, 8:17 am

what game?

'Storm the Capitol' Board Game coming this January 6th!
The "Storm the Capitol" board game..........  

R.Suave » 06 Jan 2024, 3:28 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jan 2024, 3:28 pm

Stupid as ****.

Happy Fake Insurrection Day, retard.
 

R.Suave » 06 Jan 2024, 4:31 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jan 2024, 4:31 pm

Shhhhh.

Pay attention.

Civil proceedings don't end with a conviction.

Nod.

A conviction is not required under Sec 3.

Nod.

Penalties under section 3 were repealed by congress in 1872, try again.
 

Cedar » 06 Jan 2024, 8:28 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jan 2024, 8:28 pm

Penalties under section 3 were repealed by congress in 1872, try again.

Griffin isn't precedent.

**** amateur.

R.Suave » 06 Jan 2024, 11:36 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jan 2024, 11:36 pm

Griffin isn't precedent.

**** amateur.
 

 14th Amendment Section 3

“… But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.”


“Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each house concurring therein), that all political disabilities imposed by the third section of the fourteenth article of amendments of the Constitution of the United States are hereby removed from all persons whomsoever, except Senators and Representatives of the thirty-sixth and thirty-seventh Congresses, officers in the judicial, military, and naval service of the United States, heads of departments, and foreign ministers of the United States.“ May 22 1872
 

Cedar » 06 Jan 2024, 11:47 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jan 2024, 11:47 pm

 14th Amendment Section 3

“… But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.”

“Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each house concurring therein), that all political disabilities imposed by the third section of the fourteenth article of amendments of the Constitution of the United States are hereby removed from all persons whomsoever, except Senators and Representatives of the thirty-sixth and thirty-seventh Congresses, officers in the judicial, military, and naval service of the United States, heads of departments, and foreign ministers of the United States.“ May 22 1872

Section 3 wasn't repealed...civil war traitors were given amnesty.

R.Suave » 06 Jan 2024, 11:51 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jan 2024, 11:51 pm

Section 3 wasn't repealed...civil war traitors were given amnesty.

Reading comprehension isn’t your forte.
 

Deplorables still play board games?
Like children?
Figures.

Squatchman » 07 Jan 2024, 5:32 am » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2024, 5:32 am

Deplorables still play board games?
Like children?
Figures.

Don't cry, you can play the police if you want...

 

https://youtu.be/dddXA84GIJM
 

Cedar » 07 Jan 2024, 12:14 am » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2024, 12:14 am

Reading comprehension isn’t your forte.

Cheddy,

Who is filling your ear with that ****?
 

R.Suave » 07 Jan 2024, 7:12 am » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2024, 7:12 am

Cheddy,

Who is filling your ear with that ****?

KILL YOURSELF