Seriously?Monderegal » 03 Jan 2024, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑ According to the latest polls, Nikki Haiey only trials Trump by 4 points in the early primary state. I probably would vote for Haley if I were a Republican given she was Trump's ambassador to the United Nations and isn't just trying to woo Trump supporters. I think that has been a good strategy. She does hold more mainstream Republican views also which is a relief from the chaotic viewpoints of Trump who has a limited worldview in my opinion although he was President for four years.
Yeah, we desperately need to return to the duopolistic norm.Monderegal » 03 Jan 2024, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑ According to the latest polls, Nikki Haiey only trials Trump by 4 points in the early primary state. I probably would vote for Haley if I were a Republican given she was Trump's ambassador to the United Nations and isn't just trying to woo Trump supporters. I think that has been a good strategy. She does hold more mainstream Republican views also which is a relief from the chaotic viewpoints of Trump who has a limited worldview in my opinion although he was President for four years.
Cannonpointer » 03 Jan 2024, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah, we desperately need to return to the duopolistic norm.
In tardworld.
It's been so very good for all of us.
Why, the three successive decades of middle-class shrinkage ALONE argues for a return.
In tardworld. https://images.seattletimes.com/wp-cont ... 98c393.jpg
Stagger back into the desert, ElijhaCannonpointer » 03 Jan 2024, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah, we desperately need to return to the duopolistic norm.
In tardworld.
It's been so very good for all of us.
Why, the three successive decades of middle-class shrinkage ALONE argues for a return.
In tardworld. https://images.seattletimes.com/wp-cont ... 98c393.jpg
Kennedy is a zionist and an epstein island visitor. Not my cup of tea in either matter.Monderegal » 03 Jan 2024, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑ Kennedy supporter? You're not going to get that from Trump either and at least old man Biden is trying (good luck with the special interests).
Scintillating refutation, lightweight.
John Talks needs a grammar lesson.Jantje_Smit » 03 Jan 2024, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑ Seriously?
It's only 40 seconds, watch it till the end..
![]()
https://youtu.be/AnGMFN-hRnc
Why do you believe your gibberish deserves "refutation"?
It's called amnesty. The government granted a lot of it after the Civil War since technically the South committed treason against the United States. Worse than Trump but there are a lot of examples across the globe of the same issue. It's also one of the main reasons a President has pardon power. Politics can lead to laws being skirted. That's why Nikki Haley would pardon Trump according to her logic and I kinda agree.Jantje_Smit » 03 Jan 2024, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑ Seriously?
It's only 40 seconds, watch it till the end..
![]()
https://youtu.be/AnGMFN-hRnc
It was YOU who appeared to think so, given your clunky attempt.
You clearly sensed the contempt in my curt dismissal....hence your sudden attack of The Vapors.Cannonpointer » 03 Jan 2024, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑ It was YOU who appeared to think so, given your clunky attempt.
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
Yes yes - it was CONTEMPT, not a want of competence, that caused your failure.R.Suave » 03 Jan 2024, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑ You clearly sensed the contempt in my curt dismissal....hence your sudden attack of The Vapors.
No...Cannonpointer » 03 Jan 2024, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes yes - it was CONTEMPT, not a want of competence, that caused your failure.![]()
Cannonpointer » 03 Jan 2024, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑It was YOU who appeared to think so, given your clunky attempt.
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
Won't waste his time.Cannonpointer » 03 Jan 2024, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑It sure as **** sends YOUR kind scurrying, rodent.R.Suave » 03 Jan 2024, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑ Oblige your correspondent to post his/her Rules of Engagement and to stipulate to abide by them.
That will clear this room, in a heartbeat.
she won't win against trump. the only hope is that the dems pick some one other than biden, hopefully joe manchin, who might run independently, I would vote for him. biden is losing numbers, the dems would be fools to nominate him.Monderegal » 03 Jan 2024, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑ According to the latest polls, Nikki Haiey only trials Trump by 4 points in the early primary state. I probably would vote for Haley if I were a Republican given she was Trump's ambassador to the United Nations and isn't just trying to woo Trump supporters. I think that has been a good strategy. She does hold more mainstream Republican views also which is a relief from the chaotic viewpoints of Trump who has a limited worldview in my opinion although he was President for four years.
jerrab » 03 Jan 2024, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑ she won't win against trump. the only hope is that the dems pick some one other than biden, hopefully joe manchin, who might run independently, I would vote for him. biden is losing numbers, the dems would be fools to nominate him.