Daily News Beat

User avatar
By usa360
3 Jan 2024 6:19 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 2
User avatar
Cannonpointer
4 Jan 2024 8:23 am
4 Jan 2024 8:23 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,964 posts
Skans » 04 Jan 2024, 9:06 am » wrote:
usa360 » 03 Jan 2024, 7:19 pm » wrote: bla bla bla...

As the legal proceedings unfold, Trump's name remains on the ballot in both states, emphasizing the critical nature of these appeals and their potential impact on the nation's political landscape.
Source?
Not ONE relevant fact was proffered in that cheap word salad, save the one I highlighted. 
 
 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Skans
4 Jan 2024 8:25 am
4 Jan 2024 8:25 am
User avatar
      
15,413 posts
Cannonpointer » 04 Jan 2024, 9:21 am » wrote: It must be hard to be a skank in a non-skank's world, a dummy in a smart person's world, and a fraud in a world hostile to frauds. 

But she has a 900k salary, I'm told. That'll pay for sex, even when yo NAYSTY!
LOL!!!  Sex would be difficult with that one.  But, I must admit, for the right price and in a pitch black room, and using boner pills.............................in a pitch black room and a few more boner pills............................... Geeeeeezzzzz, she looks like a man................................ can't do it; bitch, here's your money back.
 
 
User avatar
Cannonpointer
4 Jan 2024 8:29 am
4 Jan 2024 8:29 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,964 posts
Skans » 04 Jan 2024, 9:25 am » wrote: LOL!!!  Sex would be difficult with that one.  But, I must admit, for the right price and in a pitch black room, and using boner pills.............................in a pitch black room and a few more boner pills............................... Geeeeeezzzzz, she looks like a man................................ can't do it; bitch, here's your money back.
He ugly fuh SHOW.
 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Skans
4 Jan 2024 8:30 am
4 Jan 2024 8:30 am
User avatar
      
15,413 posts
Cannonpointer » 04 Jan 2024, 9:23 am » wrote: Not ONE relevant fact was proffered in that cheap word salad, save the one I highlighted.
If it looks like spam, smells like spam and makes you wanna **** like spam......

I note the guy comes to this forum claiming to be looking to debate and then delves into mindless spam. 
 
 
User avatar
ConsRule
4 Jan 2024 8:39 am
4 Jan 2024 8:39 am
User avatar
     
3,376 posts
Just what this board needs...another poster with no thoughts of their own.
User avatar
Cannonpointer
4 Jan 2024 8:50 am
4 Jan 2024 8:50 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,964 posts
Skans » 04 Jan 2024, 9:30 am » wrote: If it looks like spam, smells like spam and makes you wanna **** like spam......

I note the guy comes to this forum claiming to be looking to debate and then delves into mindless spam.
Oh, it's a pattern. I've been at this board alone for a decade, and I'm the guy who has to un-shadow ban newbies. The office perforce begets the formation of distinctions, categorizations, observations of linkages and like-kinds, etc. One tends to smell what the rock is cooking before one even bothers to on-board. 

This one is the proto-typical weak leftists pimple-face (at any age) who believes that "debate" is a contest involving the quick draw of sources - often devolving rapidly to Gish gallops. It believes that opinions counter to experts should be impermissible for their impertinence. 

I can link you to a thread involving RichClem - a republican establishment contard whose end-all source was (I **** YOU NOT) the Opinion page of the Wall Street Journal. He genuinely believed that denying anything this source proffered was deliberately dishonest. For **** and giiggles - purely - I decided to argue that Carter was a better president in every domain than was Reagan. Just to mind **** this midget. 

In the end, I was shocked to find compelling evidence for my thesis (seek and ye SHALL find). My original intent was simply to mind **** Rich Clem. Anyway, one of the funniest responses I elicited from him was an outraged accusation that I was posting my OWN opinions and doing my OWN analyses of the government data upon which I relied for my arguments. 

He genuinely believed that to be a dirty trick - not deferring to recognized experts. 

So this disease exists in both camps - though, obviously, it is more deeply rooted in the camp that is confused about science, whether it be science about climate, medicine, or gender.
 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
1 2

Who is online

In total there are 2834 users online :: 9 registered, 13 bots, and 2812 guests
Bots: MicroMessenger, NING, ADmantX, Disco, CriteoBot, Googlebot, proximic, YandexBot, facebookexternalhit, curl/7, Applebot, Mediapartners-Google, bingbot
Updated 3 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search