DURING THE EARLY YEARS IN VIETNAM, AMERICANS WERE USING THE M-14 AND LATER THE M-16. SOLDIERS COMPLAINED ABOUT THEM JAMMING AND NOT BEING RELIABLE. THE VIET CONG WAS USING THE AK-47, THE MOST RELIABLE WEAPON PRODUCED. WHEN AMERICAN TROOPS HAD THE CHANCE TO RETRIEVE THEM, THEY WOULD THROW AWAY THEIR AMERICAN RIFLES.Sumela » 10 Jan 2024, 10:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Murka got chased out of Vietnam and Afghanistan.
The mechanical details of a rifle are damned near meaningless
in real war. Skanny always devolves debates into his tiny wheelhouse.
US hasnt fought a peer war since ww2. Like Skanny - ITS ALL THEORY.
On the other hand, Russia has beaten the strongest military in
Europe in 22 mos.
ITS GLORIOUS!
Yup, Ive read the same stories.righteous » 10 Jan 2024, 10:19 pm » wrote: ↑ DURING THE EARLY YEARS IN VIETNAM, AMERICANS WERE USING THE M-14 AND LATER THE M-16. SOLDIERS COMPLAINED ABOUT THEM JAMMING AND NOT BEING RELIABLE. THE VIET CONG WAS USING THE AK-47, THE MOST RELIABLE WEAPON PRODUCED. WHEN AMERICAN TROOPS HAD THE CHANCE TO RETRIEVE THEM, THEY WOULD THROW AWAY THEIR AMERICAN RIFLES.
I HAVE A FEELING HE'S A PSYCHO LIVING IN A BUNKER WITH HIS ARSENAL.
After killing a few thousand trannies with the same weapons, over and over, it's possible that Russian forces become bored. Putin, in his benevolence, gives them new stuff to try out - for **** and giggles.Sumela » 08 Jan 2024, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑ Stop reading Swamp News Lil Roggy. Empire Roggy - The Robot.
Its good to have allies and extra weapons.
When killing 1000s of Murican Tranny Mercs with weapons from 40 countries![]()
![]()
LMAO! He is totally that guy. He worships Screechy Haley onlyrighteous » 10 Jan 2024, 10:34 pm » wrote: ↑ I HAVE A FEELING HE'S A PSYCHO LIVING IN A BUNKER WITH HIS ARSENAL.
HE KNOWS NOTHING ABOUT THE USE AND RELIABILITY OF MILITARY SERVICE WEAPONS
That's great.Skans » 08 Jan 2024, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑ When the Brits (Conservative Brits) say something, I'd believe it. Grant Shapps is a far cry from American leftist SIMPs Lloyd Austin or Antony Blinken.
""""Everyone knows how much Russians love ballet.Cannonpointer » 10 Jan 2024, 10:41 pm » wrote: ↑ After killing a few thousand trannies with the same weapons, over and over, it's possible that Russian forces become bored. Putin, in his benevolence, gives them new stuff to try out - for **** and giggles.
Everyone knows how much Russians love ballet. It stands to reason they would want to keep men in dresses on their toes.
I was unaware you had travelled to NK to see these things for yourself. Yet clearly, you have.Skans » 08 Jan 2024, 12:55 pm » wrote: ↑ You do know that North Korea hasn't been in an actual war since 1953, which was a stalemate. The NK military is actually made up of skinny, starving slaves who have never been to war; and who's leaders have never even been to a real military academy.
Me and my shooting buddies have more military experience than all of North Korea. And, I've never been in the military!
They ran us out of Syria with their hypersonic missiles, retard.Skans » 08 Jan 2024, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑ The Kalashnikov design is old, archaic and "third-world. Nearly all of the designs you mention above are Kalashnikov designs. The Kord is a clunky belt-fed machine gun reminiscent of what Americans designed in the 1910's.
It's the 21st century and Russia is stuck making guns designed prior to 1950.
UK....with a massive standing army of 30,000Cannonpointer » 10 Jan 2024, 10:44 pm » wrote: ↑ That's great.
How about telling us what you can even CONCEIVE the brits can do to NK, beyond making them pariahs on the world stage - which they have already helped the west to do?
Do you suppose they have the platforms to go beat north korea up militarily?![]()
![]()
![]()
I mean, they DID take on Argentina in the early reagan years...![]()
They're gum-flapping, son. Just gum-flapping.

HE MUST HAVE WENT OVER TO KISS HER FEETSumela » 10 Jan 2024, 10:43 pm » wrote: ↑ LMAO! He is totally that guy. He worships Screechy Haley only
because he saw the liberal whore at a gun range.![]()
Skanny is an easy bent over whore.
righteous » 10 Jan 2024, 10:50 pm » wrote: ↑ HE MUST HAVE WENT OVER TO KISS HER FEET
NEOCONS AND NEOLIBS FOR HALEY!
And this is what high heels for tranny soldiers look like:

Cannonpointer » 10 Jan 2024, 10:52 pm » wrote: ↑ And this is what high heels for tranny soldiers look like:

Yet the US is decades away from matching the Russian hypersonic missiles.Skans » 08 Jan 2024, 3:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Here's my position on that. Yes, competency and training matter. But, you can tell a lot, and I mean A LOT, by a nation's firearm designs. Russia's firearms are all based on the designs of one man - Mike Kalashnikov, a 7th grade, Kazakh dropout. Having said that, he did invent an effective, easy to manufacture albeit crude rifle platform. The Russians, having no other firearms inventors/designers stuck with that design forever.
The AK is far from "perfection". The stamped receivers flex like a 14 y.o girl-gymnast's torso when fired. The milled receivers were heavy, yet slightly better. They are difficult to scope without modification and the adjustable iron sights suck corpse-titties.
Every other industrialized nation has made advances in their small arms, except for Russia. The Czechs, Swiss, Germans, Italians, Finns, Pols, Israelis, Americans, even the Japs. The English and French are lagging behind, but they still produce some half-decent small arms. The Chinks are still stealing other country's designs. Mexico - their machinists must all be drunk on Tequila. Canada steals other country's designs as well - freaking disappointing. Spain, once upon a time, made some decent guns, but they must have been invaded by hoards of retards.
If a country can design and manufacture a fine firearms, then it can likely produce other good products as well. That's just the way it goes.
The Germans outclassed the Russians by generations. But they still lost to them.Skans » 08 Jan 2024, 4:30 pm » wrote: ↑ You don't get it. A nation's firearms is an indication of its industrialized innovation. Not a 1-to-1 correlation by any means, but still an indication.
But the Russians have hypersonics, and greater military-industrial capacity by factors than all of those nations combined.Skans » 08 Jan 2024, 4:30 pm » wrote: ↑ And, do you know what country takes the "prize"? Switzerland for military weapons with Germany a close second, Belgium 3rd and a tie between Czech and Israel. England for O/U shotguns, with Italy second. Best engravers are by far in Italy. Handguns - Germany, Swiss, U.S., Czech in that order. I chose Germany because it has more diverse designs than the Swiss.
It sure is.
If I am not mistaken, they still have that same one aircraft carrier that beat Argentina in the 80s.
And that is not half of the story.Sumela » 08 Jan 2024, 4:38 pm » wrote: ↑ And the Ukes continually complain about the NATO weaponry,
such as the H777 Howitzer. High maintenance, barrels warp easily.
Theory is one thing. Russia defeating the largest military in Europe,
700,000 strong trained to NATO standards for years.....
.....in 22 months is an actual tangible truth.
The west has been at war the entire past century and this one. They've just been at war with people who live in huts. So they are rich with special teams - poor with everything else. And special teams mean jack **** in large theater strategy. They're lovely for tactics, but strategies win wars.Skans » 08 Jan 2024, 4:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Lots of American factories produce Ammo.
Europe:Yes, presently, Russia is struggling to make more Ammo to support its wars and proxies. But, they do churn out a lot of ammo, I'll give the Russians that. The only reason the West isn't making as much ammo is because THE WEST IS NOT AT WAR!!!
- Germany - 221 Ammo factories
- Italy - 157 Ammo factories
- France 122 Ammo Factories
- Czech - 98 Ammo Factories
- Sweden, Austria and Poland each have about 50 Ammo factories.