It is a net economic benefit, and I can.Z09 » 07 Jan 2024, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑ So you can't explain how letting in millions of illegals with no jobs, homes or anywhere to go is a financial windfall for the US?
R.Suave » 07 Jan 2024, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑ Natch....another "rule for thee, what rule?"
Tiny,
Your **** is all yours.
You were born this way.
It isn't "because R. Suave"...
Huey » 07 Jan 2024, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑ Odd, my entire neighbor, which is big, was built completely with legal citizens.
My lawn care company are legal citizens.
I don't do that either.
maineman » 07 Jan 2024, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑Huey » 07 Jan 2024, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑ Odd, my entire neighbor, which is big, was built completely with legal citizens.
My lawn care company are legal citizens.
Odd... my entire neighborhood in southern Maine, which is a six-phase condominium complex with over 250 condominiums was built entirely by Spanish-speaking laborers, and the guys who mow the lawns, trim the hedges, tend the gardens and plow the snow are also all Hispanics.
Ah, geez.
Z09 » 07 Jan 2024, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑ Explain to us why letting in 6 million illegals with no income, jobs or anywhere to live is a financial success for the US taxpayers?
When you demonstrate that you understand the difference between "fiscal" and "economic" cost.Z09 » 07 Jan 2024, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑ Explain to us why letting in 6 million illegals with no income, jobs or anywhere to live is a financial success for the US taxpayers?
This is not a cause - it is an effect.maineman » 07 Jan 2024, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑ contractors and lawn care companies - not to mention farms - can't find enough American laborers to keep them in business.
The MAGA crowd whines about illegal immigration but they'd **** their pants if they had to pay at the grocery store for vegetables picked by US citizens.
Agri-business, poultry processing, lawn care, the restaurant industry, general contracting, just to name a few sectors, ALL depend on cheap immigrant labor, and the American public is addicted to the relatively cheap prices such labor allows them to be charged.
R.Suave » 07 Jan 2024, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑ When you demonstrate that you understand the difference between "fiscal" and "economic" cost.
This is why the dancy-panty dick sucker is allowed NO QUESTIONS!R.Suave » 07 Jan 2024, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑When you demonstrate that you understand the difference between "fiscal" and "economic" cost.Z09 » 07 Jan 2024, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑ Explain to us why letting in 6 million illegals with no income, jobs or anywhere to live is a financial success for the US taxpayers?
No, no - it's all YOUR fault he can't defend his thesis.
Don't presume to "translate" words you obviously don't understand, Hole.
R.Suave » 07 Jan 2024, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑ Don't presume to "translate" words you obviously don't understand, Hole.
You don't understand the difference either....in fact, that there IS a difference is a revelation to you.Cannonpointer » 07 Jan 2024, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑ No, no - it's all YOUR fault he can't defend his thesis.
He COULD defend what he says - if only YOU were a better person!
No, really.
That means I am yet ANOTHER poster unworthy of you defending your thesis to, dancy panty.R.Suave » 07 Jan 2024, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑ You don't understand the difference either....in fact, that there IS a difference is a revelation to you.