Post the comment of mine that has you staring at it in disbelief.
I don’t demand anything. No, that is your demand to avoid explaining your poison on Joe allowing 6 million migrants in.R.Suave » 07 Jan 2024, 12:13 pm » wrote: ↑ It is if you're demanding an explanation of readily definable terms.
You don't understand that there is a difference either...
Already done.R.Suave » 07 Jan 2024, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Post the comment of mine that has you staring at it in disbelief.
No waffling, just do it.
Huey » 07 Jan 2024, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑ I don’t demand anything. No, that is your demand to avoid explaining your poison on Joe allowing 6 million migrants in.
If you can’t, just say and stop running.
If no one is demanding it, why are you still yapping, Fredo?to avoid explaining
I can. You won't understand it.If you can’t, just say and stop running.
And again, no thoughts, etc...R.Suave » 07 Jan 2024, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.mediaite.com/trump/trump-sh ... ave-world/
And on June 14th, 1946, God looked down on his plan Paradise, and said, I need a caretaker. So God gave us Trump.God said, I need somebody willing to get up before dawn. Fix this country. Work all day. Fight the Marxists. Eat supper. Then go to the Oval Office and stay past midnight. And a meeting of the heads of state. So God made Trump.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apos-apo ... 03561.html
“It’s worse than you can imagine,” the email reads. “An idiot surrounded by clowns. Trump won’t read anything – not one-page memos, not the brief policy papers; nothing. He gets up halfway through meetings with world leaders because he is bored. And his staff is no better.”
I swear, these are the dumbest **** ever.
Why?Z09 » 07 Jan 2024, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Then explain how spending billions on illegals is fiscally a good move?
R.Suave » 07 Jan 2024, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑ If no one is demanding it, why are you still yapping, Fredo?
I can. You won't understand it.
Then I'll have to explain the explanation.
Lol. No stupid ***. Here, let me narrow it down for you. Whatever your stupid liberal sources say ie...CNN, MSNBC, and your brainless legtwing blogs you love, if you take the complete opposite of what they tell you to think, then you will find the truth about Trump.Vegas » 07 Jan 2024, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑ And again, no thoughts, etc...
Oh wait..here is Veghead's idea of an intelligent thought, his last sentence: "I swear, these are the dumbest **** ever."
![]()
R.Suave » 07 Jan 2024, 12:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Lol. No stupid ***. Here, let me narrow it down for you. Whatever your stupid liberal sources say ie...CNN, MSNBC, and your brainless legtwing blogs you love, if you take the complete opposite of what they tell you to think, then you will find the truth about Trump.
QED.
What a shame and what a traitor you are for suppporting this prevailing wage / standard of living destroying trend.maineman » 07 Jan 2024, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑ Odd... my entire neighborhood in southern Maine, which is a six-phase condominium complex with over 250 condominiums was built entirely by Spanish-speaking laborers, and the guys who mow the lawns, trim the hedges, tend the gardens and plow the snow are also all Hispanics.

I have explained it.Huey » 07 Jan 2024, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑ LMAO! First you claim you will explain after applying conditions. Then you falsely claim you did explain it. Now, you are admitting you didn't explain it.
Well, my work here is done. I'll look for that explanation.
Z09 » 07 Jan 2024, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑ So Suave...
Spending billions on illegals is a good move for the taxpayers of the country?
But when asked why you can't answer?
Everything has..
This applies to you too.R.Suave » 07 Jan 2024, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑ I have explained it.
Specifically, "Illegal Immigration is a net economic benefit....this is why your **** sources labor 'fiscal' cost."
Remarkably, you've been fed 100s of these stories, but never once asked
"Why do they say 'fiscal'?"...
Ask me why you haven't.
R.Suave » 07 Jan 2024, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑ I have explained it.
Specifically, "Illegal Immigration is a net economic benefit....this is why your **** sources labor 'fiscal' cost."
Remarkably, you've been fed 100s of these stories, but never once asked
"Why do they say 'fiscal'?"...
Ask me why you haven't.
You forgot to mention the number one employer of cheap labor, the military.maineman » 07 Jan 2024, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑
Agri-business, poultry processing, lawn care, the restaurant industry, general contracting, just to name a few sectors, ALL depend on cheap immigrant labor, and the American public is addicted to the relatively cheap prices such labor allows them to be charged.
No...you're lying.Vegas » 07 Jan 2024, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Only your opinion pieces. Of course they are going to be full of ****.
I will never take your opinion articles seriously. Not ever.
I can..Huey » 07 Jan 2024, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Yet can't explain why.
I think tens of thousands of them should be moved to the southeast portion of one of the whitest states in the union. Maybe then you can explain why this good for the country.
You also need to explain it to the Mayors of Chicago, NYC and Edison, NJ. 2 are dems, not sure about Edison. Tell them how good this.
When you post a definition of "fiscal cost"....even if you don't understand it.Z09 » 07 Jan 2024, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Cmon..
Show us why 6 million illegals is a good thing fiscally?