Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Liberals Have Conceded Trump Ballot Case To Donald J. Trump...
Liberals Have Conceded Trump Ballot Case To Donald J. Trump...
By Skans
9 Jan 2024 9:36 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
9 Jan 2024 6:14 pm
Constitution is vernacular tribalism. Social institutionalism is vernacular tribalism where people choose to ignore how evolving works in real time ancestors occupying space adapting to the moment in series parallel positions as ancestrally positioned now.Bidencrimefamily » 09 Jan 2024, 7:07 pm » wrote: ↑ If you are a constitutionalists you follow the constitution and these were Republicans that brought this up not democratic people.
Societal evolving isn't genetical producing each generation gap lived since inception of this species and the ancestral lineages intellectually defined as race, creed, color, national identity, gender biases, gender identity now-a-days, spiritual convictions, political beliefs about rank in social order, economic value to humanity, mind over matter philosophy, context over content facts, symbolism over substance realities where ancestors are legally defined into type cast people working against evolving as displaced adapting in space only timed apart now.
Relative time is make believe now isn't eternity. It never was money that corrupted each generation lived since dawn of civilization. This species did it to itself.
9 Jan 2024 7:52 pm
9 Jan 2024 7:58 pm
9 Jan 2024 8:39 pm
213 pages? Please summarize all those pages in 3-4 sentences
9 Jan 2024 9:17 pm
No cucks!BuckNaked » 09 Jan 2024, 9:39 pm » wrote: ↑ 213 pages? Please summarize all those pages in 3-4 sentences
10 Jan 2024 7:31 am
Yeah, you hang onto that thought while I wait to see what the SCOTUS actually says.R.Suave » 09 Jan 2024, 6:55 pm » wrote: ↑ No...because the finding was the result of an adjudication.
10 Jan 2024 7:58 am
It is a fact...Skans » 10 Jan 2024, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah, you hang onto that thought while I wait to see what the SCOTUS actually says.
4 Mar 2024 11:33 pm
Never underestimate the ramblings of demented mind.Skans » 09 Jan 2024, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑ 9-0 no way. Here's how I'm going to call it:
Sonia Sotomayor, - affirm
Clarence Thomas - reverse
John G. Roberts - reverse
Samuel A. Alito, Jr. - reverse
Elena Kagan - affirm (in between licking twat).
Amy Coney Barrett - reverse
Neil M. Gorsuch - reverse
Brett M. Kavanaugh - reverse
Ketanji Brown Jackson - affirm.
So, who do you think will be the liberal defector?
5 Mar 2024 5:43 am
just cannot stop laughing a SCOTUS has members 1-9 defining life 0-9 always justifying living without understanding there never was a missing link in evolution of numbers remaining alive today.
5 Mar 2024 6:59 am
Hey, I said I was surprised!
Still, my OP "Liberals Have Conceded Trump Ballot Case To Donald J. Trump" was on point, wasn't it. Liberals knew their lawfare against Trump in trying to keep him off of the ballot was unlawful and unconstitutional from the start. But, they did it anyway.
5 Mar 2024 9:13 am
213 pages? Please summarize what’s in there
5 Mar 2024 9:23 am
Just read it, then ask me about what you don't get.
5 Mar 2024 9:33 am
here’s the summary: trump on ballot the voters will decide
5 Mar 2024 9:56 am
For now.BuckNaked » 05 Mar 2024, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑ here’s the summary: trump on ballot the voters will decide
The future for trump looks bleak.
5 Mar 2024 10:02 am
I know it’s not looking good
5 Mar 2024 10:42 am
you read it, tell everyone what is missing?
6 Mar 2024 7:11 am
Skans » 05 Mar 2024, 7:59 am » wrote: ↑ Hey, I said I was surprised!
Still, my OP "Liberals Have Conceded Trump Ballot Case To Donald J. Trump" was on point, wasn't it. Liberals knew their lawfare against Trump in trying to keep him off of the ballot was unlawful and unconstitutional from the start. But, they did it anyway.
I couldn't resist.
6 Mar 2024 8:37 am
LOL - what other publicity stunts do you Democrats have scheduled to boost Trump's poll numbers?
6 Mar 2024 10:08 am
Not all of them Raskin and swallowell are working on a bill for congress to vote onSkans » 09 Jan 2024, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑ The L.A. Times Reports:
"The Supreme Court will probably put Trump back on the ballot in Colorado and nationwide. The Supreme Court, which announced last week that it would hear the case on a warp-speed schedule, that is a precarious combination that looks like it will give the ultimate "win" to Donald Trump. The Supreme Court will be loath to permit a patchwork result in which Trump appears on the ballot in some states but not in others. To avoid such a patchwork, a majority of the justices is likely to reverse the Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling that Trump engaged in insurrection and is therefore ineligible for office under the 14th Amendment. And the court will probably do so in a way that also prevents other states from removing the former president from the ballot."
Story written by Harry Litman. Litman is the senior legal affairs columnist for the L.A. Times, is a former U.S. attorney and deputy assistant attorney general. He isa regular commentator on MSNBC and CNN, and served as a law clerk to Thurgood Marshal and Anthony Kennedy, historically known as far-left justices on the Supreme Court.
Who is online
In total there are 6102 users online :: 12 registered, 16 bots, and 6074 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, ROG62, RebelGator, ConservativeWave, Lisa 558, nefarious101, springfield xd, sole, Huey, Fuelman
Bots: NING, DuckDuckGo, Bolt, LCC, SiteLockSpider, MQQBrowser, ADmantX, YandexBot, facebookexternalhit, Applebot, CriteoBot, Mediapartners-Google, proximic, Googlebot, curl/7, bingbot