Run from your words, Twatty...Huey » 11 Jan 2024, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Seriously.....
You are spoiled lazy lil bitch. Seriously. Ok, I accept your surrender.
I didn't. When I reposted your words I also reposted mine.
Then post my lie, in my words.Huey » 11 Jan 2024, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑ I didn't. When I reposted your words I also reposted mine.
I have made my case. Waiting on you. For the record, you making your case does not include me doing any of your work.
As it is clear that you lied about me lying, there is nothing I need to respond to.Huey » 11 Jan 2024, 12:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Hey, you even replied to the reposts. The answer is no. Make your case.
R.Suave » 11 Jan 2024, 12:53 pm » wrote: ↑ As it is clear that you lied about me lying, there is nothing I need to respond to.
Huey » 11 Jan 2024, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑ You are done. The basis of your entire argument is semiauto sports rifle was designed for combat but was never issued for combat. If you wish to discuss it further there is an old thread in the water cooler section.
You were to post my "lie".Huey » 11 Jan 2024, 12:56 pm » wrote: ↑ I have reposted your words twice, and you have replied to them twice.
Those are all YOUR words, several retelling mine.
Your words have been reposted TWICE. You responded TWICE. NO more reposts.
R.Suave » 11 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm » wrote: ↑ You were to post my "lie".
Not a bunch of stuff from which I must extract it. It isn't my job to post your evidence.
And, for future reference, here's a rule.
Going forward, you will acknowledge every objective fact relevant to any discussion. The minute you don't, you concede.
For a third time? LMAO!You were to post my "lie".
1. They were extracted in the reposts.Not a bunch of stuff from which I must extract it. It isn't my job to post your evidence.
And, for future reference, here's a rule.
Going forward, you will acknowledge every objective fact relevant to any discussion. The minute you don't, you concede.
@R. SuaveHuey » 11 Jan 2024, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑Hell, you can't even retell your own argument.R.Suave » 11 Jan 2024, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑ Never, ever, presume to retell my argument.
Ask me why you musn't.
We have already established that semi autos WERE, in fact, issued to the military.
Just another in a long list of ASSumptions you've tried to peddle as fact.
What is this "we", Askholio?We have already established that semi autos WERE, in fact, issued to the military.
There is no Colt Sporter, which is a semi auto sports rifle, on this list of Colt models. As a mater of fact there is no Semi auto only rifle on the military list.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ian_models
Game. Set. Match.
If you wish to go into this further you know where to find the thread.
Just another in a long list of ASSumptions yYOU have tried to peddle as fact.
WHERE is my "lie"?Huey » 11 Jan 2024, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑ @R. Suave
, that is number 2 for you. As you can see YOUR WORDS were extracted.
![]()
![]()
Huey » 11 Jan 2024, 1:13 pm » wrote: ↑ For a third time? LMAO!
1. They were extracted in the reposts.
2. Going forward you will make your own arguments without demanding I do your work for you. If something has already been reposted and you demand it to be reposted again, you concede.
try this again, but with words you understand.1. They were extracted in the reposts
But you're a liar, so I doubt it.
Trump's idea of infrastracture was a brick wall in a river.Bidencrimefamily » 09 Jan 2024, 7:49 pm » wrote: ↑ Biden spent less and got the chips act infrastructure inflation reduction act. And I could go on.
I am still waiting.