god forbid...Sumela » 11 Jan 2024, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑ We are being set up to get Screechy Haley elected....
BIDEN 2.0 - except uglier.
The Sleepies and the Screechies...
Bidencrimefamily » 11 Jan 2024, 12:48 pm » wrote: ↑ Old republican trick to go do a photo ops at the border and not fund birder security
Bidencrimefamily » 11 Jan 2024, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑ It doesn't shock me that none of you Republicans knew about this.
The right wing media that you read doesn't want to actually inform you. No they don't want you educated.
Because the most educated vote Democrat and not MAGA.
Well, that's just another lie. Democrats fought Trump tooth and nail to deny him funding for a wall.Mrkelly » 11 Jan 2024, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑ Same with tRump
dems could have pushed for Medicare for All too under Obama
but
donors
Bidencrimefamily » 11 Jan 2024, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑ https://nypost.com/2023/10/19/bidens-ur ... -security/
14 billion in funding to seal off the southern border and the republicans say no we dont actually want to seal off the southern border. We need the scare tactics and the people rushing over the border to virtue signal that Biden doesn't want to actually do anything.
All ****, all the time, Hole.Z09 » 11 Jan 2024, 8:25 am » wrote: ↑ He wants to let in more illegals...
And wants to hire more lawyers for them
Not...
Actually building a wall or stopping these people
Yeah you gotta pay the border patrol idiot.Z09 » 11 Jan 2024, 5:13 pm » wrote: ↑ Exactly...
Biden doesn't want more $$ to help Americans
It's to help illegals
Huey » 11 Jan 2024, 4:26 pm » wrote: ↑ IF you read the story (from Oct) the money is not going to securing the border. It is going to things like processing illegals, etcValidating his colleague’s fears, Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) argued Thursday that additional congressional appropriations for the southern border should go to soft costs that come with overseeing the US-Mexico boundary line. “There’s a huge need to reimburse for the costs of processing,” Murphy told the AP.“So it’s personnel costs, it’s soft-sided facilities, it’s transportation costs.”
Bidencrimefamily » 11 Jan 2024, 8:27 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah and you heard nothing about it I bet.
Why hasn't the republican right wing disinfornation news you get tell you that he asked to seal the border and Republicans said no?
He wants money to NOT close the border.
“It’s got to be designed to secure the border, not to facilitate travel through the border,” Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-ND) told the Associated Press.
Yes I have a clue. But you certainly do not.Z09 » 11 Jan 2024, 7:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Do you have any clue?
You're embarrassing yourself.
Under Biden 6 million illegals have crossed the border.
And he wants open borders obviously
Nope you catch them when they come in illegally.popscott » 11 Jan 2024, 8:28 pm » wrote: ↑ It has nothing to do with "security"... it only about increased processing... The Republicans are not playing this stupid silly game...... This thread is just more liberal misinformation and propaganda.. It is not going to be funny when these invaders mount an attack inside our country.... if you don't realize that as fact then there is no help for you...
Bidencrimefamily » 11 Jan 2024, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑ Doesn't change the fact the republican congress turn down a deal to secure the border does it. Nope.![]()
![]()
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4390 ... gressional Republicans are threatening to shut down the government if Democrats don’t pass House Resolution — or H.R. 2 — a sweeping bill that would drastically restrict the asylum process while establishing a vast new surveillance system to forcibly freeze regional migration and crack down on the existing undocumented population. Republicans say that the bill, which passed the GOP-controlled House last year with no Democratic support, is necessary to stop hundreds of thousands of migrants — including thousands of unaccompanied children — from coming across the U.S. southern border. And they have repeatedly sought to tie its passage to Democratic priorities — such as military aid to Ukraine or, this week, the passage of a federal budget. “Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, and everybody else — they do not want to do the simple job of securing the border, and so now [is] when you have a massive catastrophe which they created,” Rep. Byron Donalds (R-Fla.) told Fox News.[/b]Bidencrimefamily » Today, 7:56 am » wrote: ↑
Today, 7:56 am
The republican house turned down border security.
You supply as many names of Conservative politicians and celebrities who are in favor of Illegal Aliens as you can and I will supply the list of Liberal politicians and celebrities that are in favor of Illegal Aliens.Bidencrimefamily » Today, 5:59 am » wrote: ↑
Today, 5:59 am
The Republicans don't actually want to fix problems. They want to electioneer off the problem. Hoping that you don't actually learn the truth.

"In Joe Biden's first 100 days, he took 94 executive actions on immigration, including halting border wall construction, ending the successful Remain in Mexico policy, dismantling border security, and more, resulting in the worst border crisis our country has ever seen," Rep. OwensBidencrimefamily » 11 Jan 2024, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑ No actually the proposal that Biden came out with want to hire thousands of new Border patrol agents. You didn't read the article did you.