Liberal Forum

R.Suave » 14 Jan 2024, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2024, 9:16 am

Perhaps if you defined what you consider "getting" him...

I suspect that is an ever shifting target..

You're right, you liberals are a shifty lot..

But let's go with the original definition.. damn, still no up to date version..

 


 
 

RedheadedStranger » 14 Jan 2024, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2024, 9:33 am

I'm trying to find where Trump told the Georgia officials to "lie" and just give him the votes he needs... like this idiot claims.

Just so you know, this Bidencrimefamily clown lies constantly and constantly creates new accounts under different names after being called on it.

Oh wait...

Telling election officials to recalculate and find votes is voter fraud and Donald hoover Trump needs to go to jail. 

Jantje_Smit » 14 Jan 2024, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2024, 9:35 am

You're right, you liberals are a shifty lot..

But let's go with the original definition.. damn, still no up to date version..

 

According to some **** meme, Brinker?

By that measure, given a demand for Due Process, I'd say 91 criminal counts is pretty good progress..

Clear now?
 

RedheadedStranger » 14 Jan 2024, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2024, 9:33 am

I'm trying to find where Trump told the Georgia officials to "lie" and just give him the votes he needs... like this idiot claims.

Just so you know, this Bidencrimefamily clown lies constantly and constantly creates new accounts under different names after being called on it too.

Oh wait...

How else was Grifty to find the number of votes he needed?

Oh wait...

It's different when you are always confused with Legends.

R.Suave » 14 Jan 2024, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2024, 9:39 am

According to some **** meme, Brinker?

By that measure, given a demand for Due Process, I'd say 91 criminal counts is pretty good progress..

Clear now?

So, you're willing to go on the record as admitting they are making good progress to getting him now?

 
 

Jantje_Smit » 14 Jan 2024, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2024, 9:59 am

So, you're willing to go on the record as admitting they are making good progress to getting him now?

You'd have to understand our system, Hans...

R.Suave » 14 Jan 2024, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2024, 10:00 am

You'd have to understand our system, Hans...

It's ok, I understand, you're not willing to go on the record..

I can't help but noticing that the woke snowflakes never answer the question, they always try to weasel their way out of it, deep down they know they will be disappointed again.. well, maybe not that deep.. isn't that right, @R. Suave ?

 
 

Jantje_Smit » 14 Jan 2024, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2024, 10:07 am

It's ok, I understand, you're not willing to go on the record..

Trump told the geogria election officials to find votes and say you recalculated. 

Which is voter fraud. 

He got caught red handed. 
 

Jantje_Smit » 14 Jan 2024, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2024, 10:07 am

It's ok, I understand, you're not willing to go on the record..

I just did.

Your meme set a very high bar..

It demands something unprecedented.

We are making unprecedented progress....but it is at a pace determined by Due Process.

Since you started yapping that insipid ****, would you say your position has strengthened?

R.Suave » 14 Jan 2024, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2024, 10:00 am

You'd have to understand our system, Hans...

We understand full well how the Dems perversion of the law "system" works ......



We cannot allow partisan hacks and their media lapdogs to overtake our legal system for personal animusConsider whether a tough cookie DA with a chip on her should, de rigueur hatred of Trump, immense political ambition, and opportunity to end Trump’s campaign would misuse the system for this case? The question answers itself. Therefore, this prosecution must be sent to a new GA DA in another county, a stay of action must be filed, for say 6 months, during which a fine-tooth comb must be used to examine every detail of Fani’s prosecution. Undoubtedly it must be dismissed.The Bee Gees may have sung Fanny be Tender with My Love, but should Fani & BF Nate be prosecuted and sent to the Big House for a few years, for theft, fraud and purposely undermining justice? Meanwhile, note Trump Georgia co-defendant wins 3-month delay in case.The hunt for political rivals, as seen against Trump and his friends, employees and even supporters is called Proscription:

1. “A decree of condemnation to death or used politically to refer to state-approved murder or banishment. Originating in Ancient Rome, with public identification and official condemnation of declared by the state, often involving confiscation of property. Its usage is significantly widened to describe governmental & political sanctions of varying severity on individuals and classes of people who’ve fallen into disfavor, from the en masse suppression of adherents of unorthodox ideologies to the suppression of political rivals or personal enemies.”

The lesson here is ultimately that we cannot allow partisan hacks and their media lapdogs to overtake our legal system for personal animus against officially condemned persons. Because this will become the default approach to all conservatives and will destroy the pinnacle of Anglo-American Law’s crown jewel – the Rule of Law itself.

 

It's clear as day that Trump told the Georgia election officials to find votes and lie to the American people and say they recalculated.

He even threatened them telling them that they could go to jail if they did not do it.

Majik » 14 Jan 2024, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2024, 10:22 am

We understand full well how the Dems perversion of the law "system" works ......

We cannot allow partisan hacks and their media lapdogs to overtake our legal system for personal animusConsider whether a tough cookie DA with a chip on her should, de rigueur hatred of Trump, immense political ambition, and opportunity to end Trump’s campaign would misuse the system for this case? The question answers itself. Therefore, this prosecution must be sent to a new GA DA in another county, a stay of action must be filed, for say 6 months, during which a fine-tooth comb must be used to examine every detail of Fani’s prosecution. Undoubtedly it must be dismissed.The Bee Gees may have sung Fanny be Tender with My Love, but should Fani & BF Nate be prosecuted and sent to the Big House for a few years, for theft, fraud and purposely undermining justice? Meanwhile, note Trump Georgia co-defendant wins 3-month delay in case.The hunt for political rivals, as seen against Trump and his friends, employees and even supporters is called Proscription:

1. “A decree of condemnation to death or used politically to refer to state-approved murder or banishment. Originating in Ancient Rome, with public identification and official condemnation of declared by the state, often involving confiscation of property. Its usage is significantly widened to describe governmental & political sanctions of varying severity on individuals and classes of people who’ve fallen into disfavor, from the en masse suppression of adherents of unorthodox ideologies to the suppression of political rivals or personal enemies.”

The lesson here is ultimately that we cannot allow partisan hacks and their media lapdogs to overtake our legal system for personal animus against officially condemned persons. Because this will become the default approach to all conservatives and will destroy the pinnacle of Anglo-American Law’s crown jewel – the Rule of Law itself.

I don't read garbage..

Ask me how I know it's garbage...
 

Bidencrimefamily » 14 Jan 2024, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2024, 10:08 am

Trump told the geogria election officials to find votes and say you recalculated. 

Which is voter fraud. 

He got caught red handed.

So, you got him now?

 
 

R.Suave » 14 Jan 2024, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2024, 9:57 am

How else was Grifty to find the number of votes he needed?

It's different when you are always confused with Legends.

Did Trump tell the Georgia election officials to lie?

Yes or No?

It's a simple question.
 

RedheadedStranger » 14 Jan 2024, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2024, 10:32 am

Did Trump tell the Georgia election officials to lie?

Yes or No?

It's a simple question.

Yes, clearly, indisputably.

He had no reason to call.
 

R.Suave » 14 Jan 2024, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2024, 10:36 am

Yes, clearly, indisputably.

He had no reason to call.

So... based purely on the fact that he made the call at all means he asked Georgia election officials to lie... according to you anyway.

I never saw him asking anyone to lie in the transcripts of the phone call... and sure if if had, the leftists would have been plastering it all over the place repeatedly ever since.
 

R.Suave » 14 Jan 2024, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2024, 10:17 am

I just did.

Your meme set a very high bar..

It demands something unprecedented.

We are making unprecedented progress....but it is at a pace determined by Due Process.

Since you started yapping that insipid ****, would you say your position has strengthened?

You are asking me if they got him now?


 

 
 
 

All you gotta do is listen to the phone call.

It's in English

And Trump said lie to the American people and say you recalculated.

Just find me 11,780 votes

That's voter fraud.

RedheadedStranger » 14 Jan 2024, 10:40 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2024, 10:40 am

So... based purely on the fact that he made the call at all means he asked Georgia election officials to lie... according to you anyway.

I never saw him asking anyone to lie in the transcripts of the phone call... and sure if if had, the leftists would have been plastering it all over the place repeatedly ever since.

Your fee-fees are, again, not at issue.

Tell me under what pretext Grifty could make such a call....

Then tell me where these votes would come from...
 

Jantje_Smit » 14 Jan 2024, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2024, 10:41 am

You are asking me if they got him now?


 

No...I'm asking if you do anything other than Insipid.