I can. I did.actionjackson » 12 Jan 2024, 8:08 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm still waiting for you to post peer reviewed studies that support your claims. Hell, just post one study. ONE. Just ONE.
You can't.
I can. I did.actionjackson » 12 Jan 2024, 8:08 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm still waiting for you to post peer reviewed studies that support your claims. Hell, just post one study. ONE. Just ONE.
You can't.
GHETTOBLASTER » 12 Jan 2024, 8:48 pm » wrote: ↑ How many un masked people did you actually see coughing, sneezing, etc, in public, during the pandemic ...?
I didn't see any and I spent just as much time out in public as you and everyone else did.
Once we subtracted the death count of the elderly [with co-morbid factors] we were left with a very, very low probability of death for everyone else.
We could have allowed the elderly school teachers the option to take an early retirement and bring in young healthy teachers who had an extremely low risk of death...[vaxxed or not] to take those jobs.
The kids always had an extremely low risk of death, there was no need to keep them from going to class and especially no reason to vax them.
You're just an easily traumatized / brainwashed Snowflake that the [[[JWO / MSM]]] really "did a number on"....

Not what he asked.
I can. I did.actionjackson » 12 Jan 2024, 8:08 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm still waiting for you to post peer reviewed studies that support your claims. Hell, just post one study. ONE. Just ONE.
You can't.
I can. I did.actionjackson » 12 Jan 2024, 8:08 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm still waiting for you to post peer reviewed studies that support your claims. Hell, just post one study. ONE. Just ONE.
You can't.
Cannonpointer » 12 Jan 2024, 9:27 pm » wrote: ↑ I can. I did.
This study from the Lancet confirms that contrary to the claim that the mRNA vaccines remain localized to the injection cite, they are showing up in human breast milk. https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPd ... %2900366-3
I can. I have.actionjackson » 12 Jan 2024, 8:08 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm still waiting for you to post peer reviewed studies that support your claims. Hell, just post one study. ONE. Just ONE.
You can't.
Vaccines have side effects sometimes. We know that.Cannonpointer » 12 Jan 2024, 9:34 pm » wrote: ↑ I can. I did.
This study from Public Health (a reputed research journal published by Oxford University Press) - paywalled, but available HERE in PDF - found that 35% of vaccinated healthcare workers were unable to work following (many times coerced) "vaccination" with the mRNA vaccines.
The study found that with each Covid "vaccination," healthcare workers get sicker – applying for progressively more leave and taking more analgesic medication after each dose.
Cannonpointer » 12 Jan 2024, 9:53 pm » wrote: ↑ I can. I have.
This is from ResearchGate (rated high credibility and pro-science by media bias fact check), declaring HCQ safe & effective against Covid: https://ratical.org/PandemicParallaxVie ... d-Safe.pdf. It preceded your study by 3&1/2 years. So the first line of the abstract is knowingly false. There IS a case for HCQ, contrary to your cite's OPENING claim. Hundreds of actual doctors agree.
I have done so. The post you just responded to contains peer reviewed science.actionjackson » 12 Jan 2024, 9:55 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm not interested in pop culture. Post peer review. Post actual quotes.
I have shown you THE top public health official in New Zealand turning whistle blower and exposing a massive die off.actionjackson » 12 Jan 2024, 9:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Vaccines have side effects sometimes. We know that.
Show a quote.
Whistle blowing is not peer review. You have a 94 page thread with no peer review. Nothing but gibberish.Cannonpointer » 12 Jan 2024, 9:59 pm » wrote: ↑ I have shown you THE top public health official in New Zealand turning whistle blower and exposing a massive die off.
There are lots of quotes in it. Do you want me to watch it FOR you, and provide you with a few?
Then quote it.Cannonpointer » 12 Jan 2024, 9:58 pm » wrote: ↑ I have done so. The post you just responded to contains peer reviewed science.
With actual quote.
There is nothing "pop culture" about it.
As I predicted, you are not an honest broker, son.
"Our findings demonstrate that the COVID-19 vaccine mRNA is not confined to the injection site but spreads systemically and is packaged into BM EVs."
Who lied to you? What did they say?Cannonpointer » 12 Jan 2024, 10:02 pm » wrote: ↑ "Our findings demonstrate that the COVID-19 vaccine mRNA is not confined to the injection site but spreads systemically and is packaged into BM EVs."
^We were lied to.
"Hydroxychloroquine is Effective and Safe for the Treatment of COVID-19, and May be Universally Effective When Used Early Before Hospitalization"
What does your chart look like when you subtract age 60 and older...?
We were told the mRNA vaccines remain localized at the injection site.