Who was told? By who? What did they say? You'll need a quote.Cannonpointer » 12 Jan 2024, 10:05 pm » wrote: ↑ We were told the mRNA vaccines remain localized at the injection site.
So?Cannonpointer » 12 Jan 2024, 10:04 pm » wrote: ↑ "Hydroxychloroquine is Effective and Safe for the Treatment of COVID-19, and May be Universally Effective When Used Early Before Hospitalization"
So the media pretended that anyone who wanted that medication were bleach drinkers, and they described Ivermectin as horse medicine.
I don't care what media says. We're discussing peer review. Stick to science, non-science boy.Cannonpointer » 12 Jan 2024, 10:09 pm » wrote: ↑ So the media pretended that anyone who wanted that medication were bleach drinkers, and they described Ivermectin as horse medicine.
There has been tremendous dishonesty on your side. You are an activist, pushing forced vaccination - all up in your neighbors' business to force them to play the lab rat with experimental medications.
That puts you on a team. I am exposing your team's lies. You own them.
No, I won't be going down this road with you.actionjackson » 12 Jan 2024, 10:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Who was told? By who? What did they say? You'll need a quote.
Your OP has no peer review, fruitcake.actionjackson » 12 Jan 2024, 10:10 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't care what media says. We're discussing peer review. Stick to science, non-science boy.
Cannonpointer » 12 Jan 2024, 10:12 pm » wrote: ↑ No, I won't be going down this road with you.
If you wish to pretend we were not told that, I'm okay with it.
Let's pretend it together, and just dismiss that evidence. I do not care to go get proof of the lies we all know were told, when you will simply respond by making a new dishonest demand.
You said I could not publish peer reviewed science. I did - over and over. Then you demanded I quote it. I did. more than once. Then you said so what.
So here is what:
1. You were incorrect
2. Your team lies
3. The "vax" is experimental
4. Coercing people to participate in medical experiments is a crime against humanity under international law
No kidding, slick. It's obviously my point of view.Cannonpointer » 12 Jan 2024, 10:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Your OP has no peer review, fruitcake.
We are discussing your slimy OP, which presumes to tell women what they can do with their own bodies, fascist.
We are discussing your dishonesty, misogyny, misanthropy, and cowardice.
And it is anti-science and anti-human.actionjackson » 12 Jan 2024, 10:18 pm » wrote: ↑ No kidding, slick. It's obviously my point of view.
There is a poster here that started a thread back at the tail end of the scamdemic calling for all "anti-vaxxers" to be shot.actionjackson » 12 Jan 2024, 10:18 pm » wrote: ↑ No kidding, slick. It's obviously my point of view.
You're not libertarian.RedheadedStranger » 12 Jan 2024, 10:22 pm » wrote: ↑ There is a poster here that started a thread back at the tail end of the scamdemic calling for all "anti-vaxxers" to be shot.
Do you agree, or do you just think they should be cast out of society and/or locked up in Government camps for non compliance?
Have you five out what a Libertarian is yet?
Just... damn...
You don't even know what Libertarian means.
He doesn't now the difference between a sow and a boar, son.
So you won't discuss your views on those issues.
^^SMOKIN WEED AGAINR.Suave » 12 Jan 2024, 8:24 pm » wrote: ↑ No needvto aim a Carl Gustav...just point it in the direction of the noise
Not with someone that has no idea what they are talking about... yet believes everything they say.
RedheadedStranger » 12 Jan 2024, 10:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Not with someone that has no idea what they are talking about... yet believes everything they say.

His OP has been destroyed, and he has continued to weasel. Any discussion with him is a troll trap and nothing more.RedheadedStranger » 12 Jan 2024, 10:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Not with someone that has no idea what they are talking about... yet believes everything they say.