It's great that the vax does that. But it does other stuff, too. And that's pretty important.actionjackson » 12 Jan 2024, 6:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Covid-19: Vaccination reduces severity and duration of long covid, study findshttps://www.bmj.com/content/380/bmj.p491
Well, actually... several hundred.
That's lovely. "May" reduce long haul symptoms. But if it kills ya, what good was it?actionjackson » 12 Jan 2024, 6:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Mayo researchers find vaccine may reduce severity of long-haul COVID symptoms
https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/disc ... -symptoms/
Thanks for waiting, fruitcake. Have some more science - since ya waited and all.actionjackson » 12 Jan 2024, 6:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Waiting for you imbeciles to post your conspiracy youtube videos and conspiracy sites.
I'll wait.
It might meet with some resistance - given the science, and all.
Speaking of violence - those vaccines sure seem to do a bit, huh?
I'm not DONE yet - I'm still coming up with!
I predict you will likely be doing that - what with being busy dying, and all.
For your pseudo-science cultists:
Did you say something about peer-reviewed studies? Here are a few:actionjackson » 12 Jan 2024, 7:20 pm » wrote: ↑ I guess I should value your credentialed review of The Lancet.Either way, take a look at the other studies I posted. Hell, look them up yourself. These studies have been replicated. Do you even know what that means? Doubtful.
Thank you so much for waiting. Here ya go.actionjackson » 12 Jan 2024, 7:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Post some peer reviewed studies showing what you claim. I'll wait.
Because you waited, I'll double up on this response.actionjackson » 12 Jan 2024, 7:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Post some peer reviewed studies showing what you claim. I'll wait.
There's so much. What the hell, I will triple up on this one - because you waited.actionjackson » 12 Jan 2024, 7:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Post some peer reviewed studies showing what you claim. I'll wait.
I really believe you're wrong about that - but here are some more, just to cover the bases:actionjackson » 12 Jan 2024, 7:52 pm » wrote: ↑ No, you didn't post any peer reviewed studies. Dismissed.
Cannonpointer » 06 Feb 2024, 10:49 pm » wrote: ↑ Well, actually... several hundred.
This is a clearing house of the peer reviewed science against the vax that is being ignored:
https://www.saveusnow.org.uk/covid-vacc ... of-lethal/
OH!
Here ya go - more peer reviewed science. That's what ya wanted - right?
It's you who got recruited,kid. Into labrattery.
Well, I have more than 94 pages - but it's not junk. It's the peer reviewed science you politely requested.
See what these ones say.actionjackson » 12 Jan 2024, 8:07 pm » wrote: ↑ The peer reviewed study your editorial refers to said this....
"The results strengthen the evidence-based rationale for administration of a third vaccine dose as a booster."