Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
The unvaxxed can be severely punished. Here’s how.
The unvaxxed can be severely punished. Here’s how.
By ActionJackson
12 Jan 2024 9:47 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
12 Jan 2024 5:51 pm
Children and adolescents who received one of the main COVID-19 vaccines were significantly protected from the illness and showed no increased signs of cardiac complications compared to young people who were not vaccinated, according to a new real-world study led by researchers from the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania and Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP).
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanr ... estitle140
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanr ... estitle140
12 Jan 2024 5:51 pm
****actionjackson » 12 Jan 2024, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑ Firstly, I am so sick of assholes where I work. With there **** exemptions. They’re not religious. They don’t believe in the constitution. They jeopardize all of us.
Solution? Everyone is REQUIRED to report to a vetted medical faculty or place. You get vaxxed. Brand is your choice. It’s attached to your social security number. That goes to the IRS.
When you file taxes, you provide the vax number the medical faculty gave you. No number? You pay a hefty fine.
****, I would even work to enforce it. I once worked doing the census. So same kind of thing. I would relesh catching some of you **** and locking you up.
But simple solution. Virtually foolproof.
ALL FEDERAL MANDATES WERE WITHDRAWN MAY 11, 2023
**** YOU AND YOUR IRS
IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT, MOVE TO A STATE THAT MANDATES THE INJECTION
12 Jan 2024 5:52 pm
Mayo researchers find vaccine may reduce severity of long-haul COVID symptoms
https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/disc ... -symptoms/
https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/disc ... -symptoms/
12 Jan 2024 5:53 pm
12 Jan 2024 5:53 pm
Coming to a state near you, maggot.POM » 12 Jan 2024, 6:51 pm » wrote: ↑ ****
ALL FEDERAL MANDATES WERE WITHDRAWN MAY 11, 2023
**** YOU AND YOUR IRS
IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT, MOVE TO A STATE THAT MANDATES THE INJECTION
12 Jan 2024 5:54 pm
I WOULD LOVE TO SPLIT YOUR HEAD OPEN WITH A TIRE IRON
12 Jan 2024 5:54 pm
**** YOU PUNK
PUT A BULET IN YOUR BRAIN
12 Jan 2024 5:54 pm
I'm sure. You maga maggots are the violent ones.
12 Jan 2024 5:55 pm
That's all you can come up with?
12 Jan 2024 5:55 pm
12 Jan 2024 5:55 pm
Punished for WHAT?actionjackson » 12 Jan 2024, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑ Firstly, I am so sick of assholes where I work. With there **** exemptions. They’re not religious. They don’t believe in the constitution. They jeopardize all of us.
Solution? Everyone is REQUIRED to report to a vetted medical faculty or place. You get vaxxed. Brand is your choice. It’s attached to your social security number. That goes to the IRS.
When you file taxes, you provide the vax number the medical faculty gave you. No number? You pay a hefty fine.
****, I would even work to enforce it. I once worked doing the census. So same kind of thing. I would relesh catching some of you **** and locking you up.
But simple solution. Virtually foolproof.
Making a level headed and rational decision NOT to play Russian Roulette by refusing to be a participant in an experiment ?
What are you a **** lunatic?
You made your choice and I made mine .....
And I bet if we were to poll the **** vaxxed world right now on whether they regret it now ......A huge Majority would say 'YES'....
So, really your big dreams of an inquisition against the unvaxxed is pretty much dead in the water ......
12 Jan 2024 5:56 pm
YOU BETCHA YA ******
12 Jan 2024 6:01 pm
Then stay home and out of the public.Majik » 12 Jan 2024, 6:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Punished for WHAT?
Making a level headed and rational decision NOT to play Russian Roulette by refusing to be a participant in an experiment ?
What are you a **** lunatic?
You made your choice and I made mine .....
And I bet if we were to poll the **** vaxxed world right now on whether they regret it now ......A huge Majority would say 'YES'....
So, really your big dreams of an inquisition against the unvaxxed is pretty much dead in the water ......
12 Jan 2024 6:02 pm
12 Jan 2024 6:12 pm
I used to put great store by the Lancet - until they blew any and all credibility by lying that anyone who suggested lab origin of covid was a conspiracy theorist -and then a year later admitted the likelihood of lab origin, WITHOUT addressing and apologizing for their previous lie.actionjackson » 12 Jan 2024, 6:48 pm » wrote: ↑ Vaccination against COVID-19 consistently reduced the risk of long COVID symptoms, which highlights the importance of vaccination to prevent persistent COVID-19 symptoms, particularly in adults.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanr ... 9/fulltext
Whether the vax in fact ameliorated by one or more of the emergency-use-only experimental "vaccines" is utterly irrelevant to the question of how much damage those "vaccines" are causing.
Preventing sniffles is a lovely thing, so long as you are not CAUSING myocarditis and other mortal issues.
The science is in on the "vaxes" - they're rendering women and men sterile, they're killing people smack in the middle of their most productive years, and they're causing athletes to collapse on the field at unprecedented rates. They are positively correlated with a 40% jump in deaths in the cohort between 25 and 50. The Lancet's narrow study does not even look into these issues.
We anti-mRNA folks have shown TONS of peer reviewed science proving all of this and more in a stickied thread called "Weight the risks of the vaccine." Even if every conclusion your study from the once great, now-discredited Lancet proves accurate, it does nothing to change the fact that Ivermectin is safer and MORE effective - cheaper and less risky.
And again, COPIOUS peer reviewed science backs this up, and is available in the thread I just named.
Fascists that want to make health decisions for others are the worst. Abortion should be between a woman and her doctor - it is NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS.
Same with my "vax" status, ya nosy creep. My natural immunity is something like 19 times more powerful than vax immunity - according to fauci. Get a clue, son.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
12 Jan 2024 6:20 pm
Cannonpointer » 12 Jan 2024, 7:12 pm » wrote: ↑ I used to put great store by the Lancet - until they blew any and all credibility by lying that anyone who suggested lab origin of covid was a conspiracy theorist -and then a year later admitted the likelihood of lab origin, WITHOUT addressing and apologizing for their previous lie.
Whether the vax in fact ameliorated by one or more of the emergency-use-only experimental "vaccines" is utterly irrelevant to the question of how much damage those "vaccines" are causing.
Preventing sniffles is a lovely thing, so long as you are not CAUSING myocarditis and other mortal issues.
The science is in on the "vaxes" - they're rendering women and men sterile, they're killing people smack in the middle of their most productive years, and they're causing athletes to collapse on the field at unprecedented rates. They are positively correlated with a 40% jump in deaths in the cohort between 25 and 50. The Lancet's narrow study does not even look into these issues.
We anti-mRNA folks have shown TONS of peer reviewed science proving all of this and more in a stickied thread called "Weight the risks of the vaccine." Even if every conclusion your study from the once great, now-discredited Lancet proves accurate, it does nothing to change the fact that Ivermectin is safer and MORE effective - cheaper and less risky.
And again, COPIOUS peer reviewed science backs this up, and is available in the thread I just named.
Fascists that want to make health decisions for others are the worst. Abortion should be between a woman and her doctor - it is NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS.
Same with my "vax" status, ya nosy creep. My natural immunity is something like 19 times more powerful than vax immunity - according to fauci. Get a clue, son.
I guess I should value your credentialed review of The Lancet.
Either way, take a look at the other studies I posted. Hell, look them up yourself. These studies have been replicated. Do you even know what that means? Doubtful.
12 Jan 2024 6:23 pm
Post some peer reviewed studies showing what you claim. I'll wait.Cannonpointer » 12 Jan 2024, 7:12 pm » wrote: ↑ I used to put great store by the Lancet - until they blew any and all credibility by lying that anyone who suggested lab origin of covid was a conspiracy theorist -and then a year later admitted the likelihood of lab origin, WITHOUT addressing and apologizing for their previous lie.
Whether the vax in fact ameliorated by one or more of the emergency-use-only experimental "vaccines" is utterly irrelevant to the question of how much damage those "vaccines" are causing.
Preventing sniffles is a lovely thing, so long as you are not CAUSING myocarditis and other mortal issues.
The science is in on the "vaxes" - they're rendering women and men sterile, they're killing people smack in the middle of their most productive years, and they're causing athletes to collapse on the field at unprecedented rates. They are positively correlated with a 40% jump in deaths in the cohort between 25 and 50. The Lancet's narrow study does not even look into these issues.
We anti-mRNA folks have shown TONS of peer reviewed science proving all of this and more in a stickied thread called "Weight the risks of the vaccine." Even if every conclusion your study from the once great, now-discredited Lancet proves accurate, it does nothing to change the fact that Ivermectin is safer and MORE effective - cheaper and less risky.
And again, COPIOUS peer reviewed science backs this up, and is available in the thread I just named.
Fascists that want to make health decisions for others are the worst. Abortion should be between a woman and her doctor - it is NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS.
Same with my "vax" status, ya nosy creep. My natural immunity is something like 19 times more powerful than vax immunity - according to fauci. Get a clue, son.
12 Jan 2024 6:23 pm
The fact that you want to control other people's health decisions renders your impotent insinuations even less relevant.actionjackson » 12 Jan 2024, 7:20 pm » wrote: ↑ I guess I should value your credentialed review of The Lancet.
I have presented dozens of studies from reputable journals demonstrating that the World Health Organization WONDER DRUG Ivermectin is more effective and safer than the mRNA "vaccines." You are just a shill for big pharma.
Your little Lancet study isn't even RELEVANT, because it deals with lasting sniffles while ignoring turbo-cancers an heart explosions.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
12 Jan 2024 6:31 pm
Already did, and showed you where to find them.actionjackson » 12 Jan 2024, 7:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Post some peer reviewed studies showing what you claim. I'll wait.
I do not view you as an honest broker AT ALL. You have demonstrated you want to control women's bodies in true Republican fashion, putting yourself between them and their health care provider and making life-and-death decisions FOR them. As such, I will not paper chase for you.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
12 Jan 2024 6:52 pm
No, you didn't post any peer reviewed studies. Dismissed.
Who is online
In total there are 7363 users online :: 2 registered, 13 bots, and 7348 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Cannonpointer
Bots: Mojeek, Bolt, MicroMessenger, proximic, ADmantX, YandexBot, CriteoBot, bingbot, curl/7, Mediapartners-Google, facebookexternalhit, Googlebot, Applebot