Liberal Forum

actionjackson » 12 Jan 2024, 8:27 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 8:27 pm

Furthermore, your link isn't even a study.  It's a reaction to an editorial.  Let me know when their theories are tested.  Let me know when the bad consequences they speculate on actually happen.

Here's another, from pibmed: https://virologyj.biomedcentral.com/art ... 22-01831-0
 

Cannonpointer » 12 Jan 2024, 8:24 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 8:24 pm

You have wanted to shoot people because you disagree with their personal medical decisions - decisions rightly to be made between them and their doctor.

I'd say you are the moron - and your little buddy in the OP is just as much a moron.

Stupid people are a problem during a plague.....

Cannonpointer » 12 Jan 2024, 8:30 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 8:30 pm

Here's another. https://virologyj.biomedcentral.com/art ... 22-01831-0

Majik already posted that.  You just copied it.  The study to which the editorial refers to said a third booster is recommended.  

Cannonpointer » 12 Jan 2024, 8:28 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 8:28 pm

It's a study. Read the abstract.

I did.  You didn't.

Biden said 23 months ago that his policies would collapse
Russia within weeks.

What else is Biden wrong about? Yikes

Cannonpointer » 12 Jan 2024, 8:28 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 8:28 pm

It's a study. Read the abstract.

It's not a study.  It's a review of studies.  Go to those studies they looked at and show me something that is not theoretical.  I'll wait.  

Biden said in May that the Uke counter offensive would be
successful in taking Crimea back from Russia....
Uhhhh, lol.

What else is Biden wrong about?

actionjackson » 12 Jan 2024, 8:39 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 8:39 pm

It's not a study.  It's a review of studies.  Go to those studies they looked at and show me something that is not theoretical.  I'll wait.

Keep waiting. I am not paper chasing for a bad faith actor. 

I have given you two studies, and I will be giving you more - just to shut your mouth about whether I can, and for no other reason. I am under no illusion about you, son. I know what you are - a weasel. 
 

R.Suave » 12 Jan 2024, 8:31 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 8:31 pm

Stupid people are a problem during a plague.....

You are, yes. 
 

Biden said in 2021 that BRICS would fail and dissolve soon.

Meanwhile, BRICS is only growing stronger.

What else is Biden wrong about?

Cannonpointer » 12 Jan 2024, 8:41 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 8:41 pm

 I am under no illusion about you, son. I know what you are - a weasel.

He’s also a miserable bitch for the state 
 
 

actionjackson » 12 Jan 2024, 8:39 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 8:39 pm

It's not a study.  It's a review of studies.  Go to those studies they looked at and show me something that is not theoretical.  I'll wait.

Peer reviewed studies are an important 

and accepted part of science  
 

R.Suave » 12 Jan 2024, 8:31 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 8:31 pm

Stupid people are a problem during a plague.....

How many un masked people did you actually see coughing, sneezing, etc, in public,  during the pandemic ...?
I didn't see any and I spent just as much time out in public as you and everyone else did.
Once we subtracted the death count of the elderly [with co-morbid factors] we were left with a very, very low probability of death  for everyone else.
We could have allowed the elderly school teachers the option to take an early retirement and bring in young healthy teachers who had an extremely  low risk of death...[vaxxed or not] to take those jobs.
The kids always had an extremely low risk of death, there was no need to keep them from going to class and especially no reason to vax them.
You're just an easily  traumatized / brainwashed Snowflake that the [[[JWO / MSM]]] really "did a number on"....  
 

actionjackson » 12 Jan 2024, 8:39 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 8:39 pm

It's not a study.  It's a review of studies.  Go to those studies they looked at and show me something that is not theoretical.  I'll wait.

Here is another study which finds that encephalitis and encephalomyelitis have been reported in connection with the gene-based COVID-19 vaccines, with many being considered causally related to vaccination.

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/10/10/1651

What you fail to realize in your headlong rush to profit pharma and wall street is that the "vaccines" are experiments. They have not been approved by the FDA. They have not been found safe by the FDA. They have not been found effective by the FDA. 

It is a crime against humanity under the rules of the hague to compel or coerce any person to participate in medical experiments. Your OP LITERALLY is a crime against humanity, and it is only your impotence to follow through on your malevolence that prevents you rightly being branded a criminal, rather than an idiot. 
 

actionjackson » 12 Jan 2024, 8:39 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 8:39 pm

It's not a study.  It's a review of studies.  Go to those studies they looked at and show me something that is not theoretical.  I'll wait.

Here is how the experiment became available to the general public. The loophole in the law that put the trump vaccine in your body was intended to allow already-terminal patients to try hail marys. It was not put in place to make experimental medications available to any ut terminal patients. 

21 U.S. Code § 360bbb - Expanded access to unapproved therapies and diagnostics

• (k) Relation to other provisionsIf a product is the subject of an authorization under this section, the use of such product within the scope of the authorization shall not be considered to constitute a clinical investigation for purposes of section 355(i), 360b(j), or 360j(g) of this title or any other provision of this chapter or section 351 of the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. 262]. 
• Countermeasures are not regulated as pharmaceutical products.

What the above means is that NO PHARMACEUTICAL REGULATION WHATSOEVER applies to products as described in the code. 

By the way, It took me a dozen searches just to FIND subsection K. Cornel's offering cuts off around E. Even one of the dot gov sits cut off similarly. https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req ... ion=prelim

actionjackson » 12 Jan 2024, 5:36 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 5:36 pm

It lessens symptoms.  Fact.

It doesn’t lessen transmission, cocksucker. FACT.

You show up at my door and you won’t be walking back out. You won’t be walking at all. FACT.
 
 

actionjackson » 12 Jan 2024, 8:08 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 8:08 pm

I'm still waiting for you to post peer reviewed studies that support your claims.  Hell, just post one study.  ONE.  Just ONE.

You can't.

I can. I did. 

Here is an article which verifies my claim about all cause mortality being up 40% according to insurance actuaries in the wake of the covid "vaccine" rollout: https://firstfactcheck.substack.com/p/c ... increasing

It describes the uptick in deaths as a 12 sigma event - an event that should occur once in 300,000 years; the equivalent of the earth being hit by an asteroid or multiple volcanoes goes off all at once, occasioned by earth quakes. 

It relies on the testimony of insurance company CEOs. 

If this genocide were affecting the UNVAXED, it would be in the news 24-7. Instead, you are hearing about it from me, on a chat board. 

Experimenting with drugs is not a healthy life style, son. 

actionjackson » 12 Jan 2024, 5:38 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 5:38 pm

I'll turn you in now.

Good luck with that, loser.  
 

It’s impossible to wake up a mind absolutely devoted to the iron fisted control of others.

actionjackson » 12 Jan 2024, 8:08 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 8:08 pm

I'm still waiting for you to post peer reviewed studies that support your claims.  Hell, just post one study.  ONE.  Just ONE.

You can't.

I can. I did.

The thing about your team - the pharma profits guardians - is that your leaders have to lie because the truth is against them.

https://alethonews.com/2022/11/27/pfize ... n%20online