No..Vegas » 13 Jan 2024, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑ So you have yet to debunk that. Not even once. but you still post it as if it s wrong.
True stupidity in its purest form.
I noticed you evaded my question. As always.
1. More strike through
2. More evasion.
R.Suave » 13 Jan 2024, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑ No..
You declare you won't look at the evidence...
Because you're a moron
You can't know, because you don't dare look.Vegas » 13 Jan 2024, 2:17 pm » wrote: ↑ It's not evidence if it's **** biased you God damn idiot.
How the hell do you not know that?
He's just hoping that you and Huey will get so bored with this very tired and worn out tactic of his that you both fall asleep ..which would allow him to "**** post" whatever Rachel trained him to believe is true without any opposition....Vegas » 13 Jan 2024, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑ So you have yet to debunk that. Not even once. but you still post it as if it s wrong.
True stupidity in its purest form.
I noticed you evaded my question. As always.
1. More strike through
2. More evasion.
Coming from the idiot who only reads 4 words of a post, then makes an *** out of himself for it later.
The Post editorial board endorsed Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012; Hillary Clinton in 2016; and Joe Biden for 2020. While the newspaper predominantly endorses Democrats in congressional, state, and local elections, it has occasionally endorsed Republican candidates.
A sphincter says what? I answered your question. Time for you to make your point.R. » wrote:Geebus...Huey » 13 Jan 2024, 1:44 pm » wrote: ↑ I was in the Army and public school. Duh.
Answer to what question? Go ahead and post it. But I am not going round and round with you. If you awake me a question I promised to answer it the same manner you answered my last two questions I asked you. You can take that to the bank, lazy eye.
Acknowledge you were answered. And don't claim it is a yes or no question. You did not stipulate that it was so you can not whine about how it was answered. And remember what I told you.
Answer to what question? Go ahead and post it. But I am not going round and round with you. If you ask me a question I promised to answer in the same manner you answered my last two questions I asked you. You can take that to the bank, lazy eye.
Why EVERYTHING takes so **** long..
That does not demonstrate bias in the reporting of the facts of this story.Vegas » 13 Jan 2024, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Coming from the idiot who only reads 4 words of a post, then makes an *** out of himself for it later.
Here is the proof of your biased sources. Though you will strike through it anyway.
Huey » 13 Jan 2024, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Been there, done that. You are more than welcome to find that thread.
Not at all. Could you explain that one? Oh, wait, that right. You think service members like your father, uncle, and your dead best friend all sucked at the tit of the government.
PS. I wasn't in for 35 years. I do have a couple of EARNED benefits. I am off to the store. I'll be back to see what attempts at a witty response you have.
@Vegas ...Huey » 13 Jan 2024, 2:52 pm » wrote: ↑ So. I am at the Bennett's creek ABC store and a guy calmly walks out with the 3 gallon bottles of Courvasier. I guess they found our quiet title are.
but an apex predator nonetheless....Huey » 13 Jan 2024, 1:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Then move. You can find duplexes in any state.
You are only 7 0r 8 years older. Plus, I may wear glasses but I can still shoot expert with an M 16, a semi auto sports rifle of a different design, or my 3 pistols. You? Not so much. You have some sort of eye condition. You are not a Nordic Demi God after all.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Are you still pissed and bitter?
R.Suave » 13 Jan 2024, 2:44 pm » wrote: ↑ That does not demonstrate bias in the reporting of the facts of this story.
The dumbest **** west of the Rockies.Vegas » 14 Jan 2024, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑
When do you ever answer questions the first time around?
Oh wait...that was a question, never mind.
Have to explain EVERYTHING to this dumb ****.Vegas » 14 Jan 2024, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑ As always, string random posts together, then pretends he is saying something.
More copy/paste.
No thoughts...ect...
Level 0.
You can't know, so you must be lying.
You don't know what any are about...you fail at Level 1.Vegas » 14 Jan 2024, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑ I can't know that you copy/paste almost all of your OPs, while proving no thoughts of your own?
It's not hard...just look.