Liberal Forum

R.Suave » 14 Jan 2024, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2024, 12:20 pm

You don't know what any are about...you fail at Level 1.

They are from lib sources, therefore nobody should give a ****. Nobody. Literally, nobody. 

Vegas » 14 Jan 2024, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2024, 12:22 pm

They are from lib sources, therefore nobody should give a ****. Nobody. Literally, nobody.

Why?

R.Suave » 14 Jan 2024, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2024, 12:24 pm

Why?

Because they are biased you dumb mother ****. The same reason why nobody should read Fox news or any right wing source. 

God man. Why would I have to even say this? 


Ivy league, my ***. No **** way you went to any college. 

Vegas » 14 Jan 2024, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2024, 12:26 pm

Because they are biased you dumb mother ****. The same reason why nobody should read Fox news or any right wing source. 

God man. Why would I have to even say this? 

Ivy league, my ***. No **** way you went to any college.

That's just your excuse for not reading...

R.Suave » 14 Jan 2024, 12:32 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2024, 12:32 pm

That's just your excuse for not reading...

Yeah, ok.   

What's your excuse for reading biased ****? 


I dare you to answer that the first time around, I **** dare you. 

1. Evade of course. 

Vegas » 14 Jan 2024, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2024, 12:35 pm

Yeah, ok.   

What's your excuse for reading biased ****? 

I dare you to answer that the first time around, I **** dare you. 

1. Evade of course.

If you don't read you have no way to know what is, or is not, biased.

You don't read because you are incurious, and a moron.

It is why you repeat the same ****, over and over....it is why you cannot post a single example of your "thought".
 

R.Suave » 14 Jan 2024, 12:53 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2024, 12:53 pm

If you don't read you have no way to know what is, or is not, biased.

You don't read because you are incurious, and a moron.

It is why you repeat the same ****, over and over....it is why you cannot post a single example of your "thought".

 

It is why you repeat the same ****, over and over....it is why you cannot post a single example of your "thought".

   

Unbelievable.    

R.Suave » 14 Jan 2024, 12:53 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2024, 12:53 pm

If you don't read you have no way to know what is, or is not, biased.


 

Just as I thought. You evaded a question, like always. 


I proved that your Washington Post was biased. And **** you if think I am going to repost that.


Your **** memory is not my problem. 



1. More evasion and ****. 

R.Suave » 14 Jan 2024, 12:53 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2024, 12:53 pm

If you don't read you have no way to know what is, or is not, biased.

 

That doesn't stop you from calling FOX News biased... and I know damn well you never read their stuff.

 

RedheadedStranger » 14 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm

That doesn't stop you from calling FOX News biased... and I know damn well you never read their stuff.

I certainly DO read it...

Unlike your role model, I can see the closed captions on the screen and understand why they are there, and why Tucker isn't. And why they paid 787 million.

So I guess the chuckle is on you.

Huey » 14 Jan 2024, 12:55 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2024, 12:55 pm

   

Unbelievable.  

Case?

R.Suave » 14 Jan 2024, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2024, 1:05 pm

Case?

The same questions that have been answered over and over and over.  Just discussing it a lil bit ago.  You are a liar.

Huey » 14 Jan 2024, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2024, 1:16 pm

The same questions that have been answered over and over and over.  Just discussing it a lil bit ago.  You are a liar.

That's vague...

Remember your rule about Vague?
 

R.Suave » 14 Jan 2024, 3:33 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2024, 3:33 pm

That's vague...

Remember your rule about Vague?

You get it.  We have discussed it already.  I'll just point it out when it happens, Kydex.

Huey » 14 Jan 2024, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2024, 3:35 pm

You get it.  We have discussed it already.  I'll just point it out when it happens, Kydex.

When you repeat it?


You're a **** idiot..

R.Suave » 14 Jan 2024, 3:38 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2024, 3:38 pm

When you repeat it?

You're a **** idiot..

Not me.  You are the one asking the same questions over and over and over and over and over.  I'll give you an example.

Huey » 14 Jan 2024, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2024, 3:43 pm

R.Suave » 14 Jan 2024, 3:38 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2024, 3:38 pm

When you repeat it?

You're a **** idiot..

Not me.  You are the one asking the same questions over and over and over and over and over.  I'll give you an example.

 

 

R. » wrote:

29 Jan 1970, 8:22 am

Huey » 14 Jan 2024, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2024, 12:19 pm

Odd, posters like @R. Suave  are strangely silent on this.

How much of the Jan 6th hearings did you watch?

 

You know the answer to that question.  It is one of your stand by diversions.

Huey » 14 Jan 2024, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2024, 3:43 pm

Not me.  You are the one asking the same questions over and over and over and over and over.  I'll give you an example.

Don't lie about answering questions.

Or making cases.

Huey » 14 Jan 2024, 3:44 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2024, 3:44 pm

You know the answer to that question.  It is one of your stand by diversions.

The answer is "Only what was shown on FOX."

But you're a lying little **** without the integrity to admit it.

 

R.Suave » 14 Jan 2024, 3:45 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2024, 3:45 pm

Don't lie about answering questions.

Or making cases.

I don't lie.  We leave to you.  Just because you don't like the way your **** is answered, or you don't like the answer, or I refuse to answer the same question that you have asked dozen of times does not mean I don't answer questions.

That is YOU reputation.  Own it.  Now do what you do in real life and here.  Blame everyone else for your actions.