Right, and then they turned around and created the worst generation.GHETTOBLASTER » 15 Jan 2024, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Congratulations and thank you for being a member of OUR GREATEST GENERATION...!!!![]()
You guys were so much more connected to the harsh realities of life after living through the Great Depression and the hardships of WWII
They did so with love and the best of intentions. I wouldn't trade my childhood for anything. :)Tempest62 » 15 Jan 2024, 1:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Right, and then they turned around and created the worst generation.
True. They didn't do it on purpose.GHETTOBLASTER » 15 Jan 2024, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑ They did so with love and the best of intentions. I wouldn't trade my childhood for anything.
Thank the [[[JWO]]] Social Engineering Program for masterminding and promoting the society debasing Hippie Movement.
LowIQTrash » 15 Jan 2024, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑ lol
Last time I brought up this subject, you claimed the growth in autism was due to disability laws and people “wanting free ****”
Our generation actually **** things up...GHETTOBLASTER » 15 Jan 2024, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑ They did so with love and the best of intentions. I wouldn't trade my childhood for anything.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Neither method is considered “scientifically sound” for the aforementioned reason. To me, it’s obvious this birth defect was not as common because if it were people would’ve noticed back in 1950 or whatever, when it only started making news sometime in the 90s and ordinary plebs started treating autism as a serious problem.GHETTOBLASTER » 15 Jan 2024, 12:42 pm » wrote: ↑ Right...it would be impossible to go back very far in time and try to figure out if this sort of birth defect was as common as it is now.... or not.
Looks like a possible vector…walkingstick » 15 Jan 2024, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑ up date on condom causing dna change. lab test show, when sperm is removed from men, place in a glass container then injected into the egg. no dna change. when the sperm in put into an condom, then injected into an egg. massive change in the dna.
LowIQTrash » 15 Jan 2024, 9:42 pm » wrote: ↑ Neither method is considered “scientifically sound” for the aforementioned reason. To me, it’s obvious this birth defect was not as common because if it were people would’ve noticed back in 1950 or whatever, when it only started making news sometime in the 90s and ordinary plebs started treating autism as a serious problem.
Well the good news is that inflation has made KFC so expensive even the Knee-Grows are balking at the “value” menuGHETTOBLASTER » 15 Jan 2024, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑ I have wondered if the KFC "secret recipe" has aluminum powder in it. I'll bet it does.
Well dey always be haven fambly and friends dat work dere 'nsheeet..so you know how dat goes 'nsheeet.LowIQTrash » 15 Jan 2024, 10:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Well the good news is that inflation has made KFC so expensive even the Knee-Grows are balking at the “value” menu
