Liberal Forum

R.Suave » 16 Jan 2024, 11:43 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 11:43 am

I don't have to.


 

     And there it is.  More projections.

QED...again. 

R.Suave » 16 Jan 2024, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 11:41 am

You looked directly at the caption under the photo....and you persist in denial.

Pathology poster child.

A caption under a photo posted on the Internet is "unambiguous evidence" of truth!

Because a society writer at Vanity Fair said so!

 
 

RedheadedStranger » 16 Jan 2024, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 11:42 am

Your "source" is the society page at Vanity Fair!

That's literally the ONLY "source" on the great expanse of the internet that's claiming that's Trump in that picture... besides YOU of course.

You got duped *******! Just accept it!

Were I to accept it because you refuse to believe it, I'd be as **** stupid as you are.

If it was false, it is actionable..

Further, given that it comes out of the photographer's archive, there is EVERY reason to accept that she would know her subjects.

Unless you are grieving...

 

R.Suave » 16 Jan 2024, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 11:44 am

From the cheap seats...

Nope, front row, second level.  Best seats at most events I attend.  Or if at a race as high as you can get.  

RedheadedStranger » 16 Jan 2024, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 11:46 am

A caption under a photo posted on the Internet is "unambiguous evidence" of truth!

Because a society writer at Vanity Fair said so!

It's fully credited....to entities accessible to Catamite Donnie's lawyers...

The strength of your faith doesn't move me...so try a different tack.
 

Huey » 16 Jan 2024, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 11:49 am

Nope, front row, second level.  Best seats at most events I attend.  Or if at a race as high as you can get.

As far from the action as you can get...

R.Suave » 16 Jan 2024, 11:51 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 11:51 am

As far from the action as you can get...

You obviously don't know **** about going to a race.  The cheap seats are the lower ones because you can't see much of the track.  The better seats are higher up and cost more because you can see more of the track.  Again you delve into areas you know nothing about.
 
At a hockey or soccer game you can see the entire play unfold.  I'll add a pic in moment.  
 


 

I want to thank all the subjects for participating....

Huey » 16 Jan 2024, 11:57 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 11:57 am

You obviously don't know **** about going to a race.  The cheap seats are the lower ones because you can't see much of the track.  The better seats are higher up and cost more because you can see more of the track.  Again you delve into areas you know nothing about.
 
At a hockey or soccer game you can see the entire play unfold.  I'll add a pic in moment.

It's starting out a little diverty....
 

R.Suave » 16 Jan 2024, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 11:58 am

It's starting out a little diverty....
 

 

You went down that road.  I did add the pic.  You may try and find a topic you know something about. 

R.Suave » 16 Jan 2024, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 11:50 am

It's fully credited....to entities accessible to Catamite Donnie's lawyers...

The strength of your faith doesn't move me...so try a different tack.

If that actually were Donald Trump, don't you think that more than just you and Vanity Fair would have been using this picture against him over the years?

I mean, come on Rico... use just a little common sense here.

Oh wait...

 
 

Huey » 16 Jan 2024, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 11:59 am

You went down that road.  I did add the pic.  You may try and find a topic you know something about.

No...not

Because R. Suave....


Because Meltdown.
 

RedheadedStranger » 16 Jan 2024, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 12:01 pm

If that actually were Donald Trump, don't you think that more than just you and Vanity Fair would have been using this picture against him over the years?

I mean, come on Rico... use just a little common sense here.

Oh wait...

What?

So you're gonna try "common sense"?


 

IT IS CLEARLY LABELED.

F'n A...
 

R.Suave » 16 Jan 2024, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 11:29 am

The Denial Pathology.

You are only denying the fact in front of your face because you are compelled to. 

And you're becoming inceasingly hysterical.

You're still insisting that's Trump...?
you're right...I'm totally **** hysterical and thanks...!!!

 
 

GHETTOBLASTER » 16 Jan 2024, 12:03 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 12:03 pm

You're still insisting that's Trump...?
you're right...I'm totally **** hysterical and thanks...!!!

It is clearly labeled...

I understand that causes cognitive conflict, but nevertheless..
 

R.Suave » 16 Jan 2024, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 12:01 pm

No...not

Because R. Suave....


Because Meltdown.
 

 

Run from your words.  You post something stupid, get busted, and then blame others for your **** ups.  Too funny  

R.Suave » 16 Jan 2024, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 12:06 pm

It is clearly labeled...

I understand that causes cognitive conflict, but nevertheless..

"It's clearly labeled"
It's not "actionable" because no sane person would take it seriously

 
 
 

R.Suave » 16 Jan 2024, 12:03 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 12:03 pm

What?

So you're gonna try "common sense"?

 

IT IS CLEARLY LABELED.

F'n A...

​​​​​You're gonna need more than a caption under a picture from the society page at Vanity Fair Rico...

That is literally the only source on the entire Internet saying that's Donald Trump, other that yourself of course.

Do a Google search for Donald Trump and Roy Cohn and see how many times your "bombshell" picture shows up.

I only see it once... and it is from the Vanity Fair piece I mentioned. That's it. 

But you keep hanging on that if it makes you feel better... and I'll just keep laughing at your dumb ***.

 


 

GHETTOBLASTER » 16 Jan 2024, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 12:08 pm

"It's clearly labeled"
It's not "actionable" because no sane person would take it seriously

"Clearly labeled" at a single (highly biased) source and NOWHERE ELSE.

That's his "unambiguous evidence". That and the blue eyes.

You just can't make this **** up Blaster!   

 
 

@R. Suave  come on you disgusting excuse for a human being. Get your next OP ready for your spam session.

I haven't got all day.