Liberal Forum

Huey » 16 Jan 2024, 1:52 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 1:52 pm

One is Roy Cohn.  Not sure who the other is.  You have one source.   ANd why should I care?

What leads you to conclude that one is Roy Cohn?




**** idiot.
 

RedheadedStranger » 16 Jan 2024, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 1:54 pm

Can you cite another source that backs up Mary's claim?

I'm not asking for several... just one.

If that really is Trump in that pic, there should be multiple sources stating the same.

I just want one more.

Get busy.

What..you mean because he said it is isn't enough for you?  

RedheadedStranger » 16 Jan 2024, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 1:54 pm

Can you cite another source that backs up Mary's claim?

I'm not asking for several... just one.

If that really is Trump in that pic, there should be multiple sources stating the same.

I just want one more.

Get busy.

If that really is Trump in that pic, there should be multiple sources stating the same

why?

There are none stating to the contrary


 

R.Suave » 16 Jan 2024, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 1:53 pm

Stupid, desperate, ****

https://images.app.goo.gl/VPVG2uupwN9JrbuA9

Lots of babies are born with blue eyes that go green or brown after the first few months or years.

Trump's eyes are a hazel green, and even appear brown in certain light.

Google is your friend ****.

 


 

https://discoveryeye.org/when-you-see-t ... -syndrome/
"Usually the same image or set of images reappears to each person.
Sam’s monkeys usually materialized around sunset. . .They stayed for 10 or 20 minutes several times a week for two years and then began to appear less frequently. Some times the images change of multiple images appear. . .
Little girls dancing in the yard
Dolly Kowalski’s Little Girls with Pink Bows
‘I see little girls with pink bows playing in my yard. At first, there was only one little girl. But after a while, she had several playmates. Now they come almost every evening for fifteen minutes. . .They are so delightful, so cheerful, so active. Their little white dresses and pink bows blow in the wind. I see them so incredibly clearly, much more clearly than I see anything else now. . . .I know they aren’t real, but you wouldn’t believe how realistic they seem. . . . I wish you could see them the way I do.’”
 
 
 

R.Suave » 16 Jan 2024, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 1:54 pm

What leads you to conclude that one is Roy Cohn?

**** idiot.

You keep asking questions yet you refuse to tell me why we should care.  Take a stand!  Remember, that question came well before yours.  

R.Suave » 16 Jan 2024, 1:56 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 1:56 pm

why?

There are none stating to the contrary

So you admit that the Vanity Fair society page piece is your only source.

That is your "unambiguous evidence".

 

RedheadedStranger » 16 Jan 2024, 1:56 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 1:56 pm

Lots of babies are born with blue eyes that go green or brown after the first few months or years.

Trump's eyes are a hazel green, and even appear brown in certain light.

Google is your friend ****.

That's his draft notice, you idiot.


 

RedheadedStranger » 16 Jan 2024, 1:58 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 1:58 pm

So you admit that the Vanity Fair society page piece is your only source.

That is your "unambiguous evidence".

Yes...

That makes the score

Me - 1

You - bupkis
 

Huey » 16 Jan 2024, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 1:57 pm

You keep asking questions yet you refuse to tell me why we should care.  Take a stand!  Remember, that question came well before yours.

Answer the question, Li'l Runny...

Oh, wait.....did you lose both legs?
 

RedheadedStranger » 16 Jan 2024, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 1:54 pm

Can you cite another source that backs up Mary's claim?

I'm not asking for several... just one.

If that really is Trump in that pic, there should be multiple sources stating the same.

I just want one more.

Get busy.

 

R.Suave » 16 Jan 2024, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 2:01 pm

Answer the question, Li'l Runny...

Oh, wait.....did you lose both legs?
 

 

I got both of them.  

Now, again, you were asked to explain why we should care long before these questions.  I told you earlier for the sake of argument it is trump in the picture.  And I asked why should we care.

When you find your peas and answer that we can move on.  

R.Suave » 16 Jan 2024, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 2:00 pm

Yes...

That makes the score

Me - 1

You - bupkis

So... you and Mary at Vanity Fair are the only two people on the Internet that believe that's actually Trump in that picture... and that's "unambiguous evidence" to you.

     


 

R.Suave » 16 Jan 2024, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 2:02 pm

I accept your concession.

 
 

https://www.facebook.com/vanityfairmaga ... 244052572/

On the Vanity Fair Facebook page they have an article about Trump's affair with Cohn but they fail to include the "Iconic photo" of "Gay Trump" posing with Cohn for some unknown reason.....

R.Suave » 16 Jan 2024, 1:56 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 1:56 pm

why?

There are none stating to the contrary

Because things that are both newsworthy and true have a legitimate monetary value
Like Red said earlier.....If this was "Sissy Boy Trump" then the MSM would have jumped all over it non stop.
It would have gone viral.

 

Huey » 16 Jan 2024, 2:06 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 2:06 pm

I got both of them.  

Now, again, you were asked to explain why we should care long before these questions.  I told you earlier for the sake of argument it is trump in the picture.  And I asked why should we care.

When you find your peas and answer that we can move on.

If knowing the details provided doesn't answer your question, I won't be able to.

Your acknowledgement is not the point of this exercise.

 

GHETTOBLASTER » 16 Jan 2024, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 2:31 pm

Because things that are both newsworthy and true have a legitimate monetary value
Like Red said earlier.....If this was "Sissy Boy Trump" then the MSM would have jumped all over it non stop.
It would have gone viral.

To whom is what "newsworthy"?

Informed people know Grifty was groomed by Roy, and know who Roy was.
 

RedheadedStranger » 16 Jan 2024, 2:09 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 2:09 pm

So... you and Mary at Vanity Fair are the only two people on the Internet that believe that's actually Trump in that picture... and that's "unambiguous evidence" to you.

   

and Mary

The photographer?


Do you need a minute to compose yourself?

RedheadedStranger » 16 Jan 2024, 2:09 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 2:09 pm

I accept your concession.

Btw,

What color are The Infanta's eyes?

https://youtu.be/B6fluCc8b2A?si=jBtbODd-4gD_oP9N