Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Reliably Triggering MAGAt Meltdowns......
Reliably Triggering MAGAt Meltdowns......
By R. Suave
16 Jan 2024 7:20 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
16 Jan 2024 8:13 pm
The guy in the pic looks nothing like Trump. He just doesn't... no matter how much you squint and **** on yourself wanting it to be.
.
If that were indeed Donald Trump dressed as a Studio 54 concubine back in the 80's, don't you think that more than just an LGBTQ hack writer for Vanity Fair would be on that bandwagon and that picture and story would be splattered all over the internet to demean the Bad Orange Man? I certainly do... but guess what, it's not.
One person at one publication is saying it's Trump... that's it. Nobody else is even coming close to saying that's Trump, except you of course. A biased writer at a biased magazine misrepresented an old photo to smear a hated political opponent, and you not only swallowed it hook line and sinker, you ran hard with it.
No other writer or publication has followed suit and made the same claim... not a single one!
You know why? Because they know it's ****, just like everyone else!
Face it Rico... you got duped.
It happens... accept it and move on already.
Oh wait... you can't. You are incapable of that.
Oh well!
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
16 Jan 2024 8:16 pm
RedheadedStranger » 16 Jan 2024, 9:13 pm » wrote: ↑ The guy in the pic looks nothing like Trump. He just doesn't... no matter how much you squint and **** on yourself wanting it to be.
.
If that were indeed Donald Trump dressed as a Studio 54 concubine back in the 80's, don't you think that more than just an LGBTQ hack writer for Vanity Fair would be on that bandwagon and that picture and story would be splattered all over the internet to demean the Bad Orange Man? I certainly do... but guess what, it's not.
One person at one publication is saying it's Trump... that's it. Nobody else is even coming close to saying that's Trump, except you of course. A biased writer at a biased magazine misrepresented an old photo to smear a hated political opponent, and you not only swallowed it hook line and sinker, you ran hard with it.
No other writer or publication has followed suit and made the same claim... not a single one!
You know why? Because they know it's ****, just like everyone else!
Face it Rico... you got duped.
It happens... accept it and move on already.
Oh wait... you can't. You are incapable of that.
Oh well!
Where is your EVIDENCE?
16 Jan 2024 8:31 pm
Uh...
1) It doesn't look like Trump.
2) Literally no one else on the entirety of the Internet has or is making the claim that it's Trump. No one... not even the National Enquirer or The Star.
3) Trump almost exclusively wore/wears a coat and tie when in public from his mid 20's on, and continues to do so... unless he's on the golf course. There isn't another pic of Trump from this time frame when he's dressed in anything but a coat and tie as well.
4) He would have been early 30's in this photo, and the guy in the photo appears to be much younger than that... and Cohn liked his "boys" much younger than 30 anyway.
Trump was probably at the event, but that guy in your pic isn't him.
Like I said, you can hang onto that fantasy all you want too, but believe me, nobody else is.
Maybe Bidencrimefamily will chime in and get your back on it, because the best I can tell, nobody else is.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
17 Jan 2024 5:45 am
RedheadedStranger » 16 Jan 2024, 9:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Uh...
1) It doesn't look like Trump.
2) Literally no one else on the entirety of the Internet has or is making the claim that it's Trump. No one... not even the National Enquirer or The Star.
3) Trump almost exclusively wore/wears a coat and tie when in public from his mid 20's on, and continues to do so... unless he's on the golf course. There isn't another pic of Trump from this time frame when he's dressed in anything but a coat and tie as well.
4) He would have been early 30's in this photo, and the guy in the photo appears to be much younger than that... and Cohn liked his "boys" much younger than 30 anyway.
Trump was probably at the event, but that guy in your pic isn't him.
Like I said, you can hang onto that fantasy all you want too, but believe me, nobody else is.
Maybe Bidencrimefamily will chime in and get your back on it, because the best I can tell, nobody else is.
What color are The Infanta's eyes?1) It doesn't look like Trump.
17 Jan 2024 5:47 am
RedheadedStranger » 16 Jan 2024, 9:13 pm » wrote: ↑ The guy in the pic looks nothing like Trump. He just doesn't... no matter how much you squint and **** on yourself wanting it to be.
.
If that were indeed Donald Trump dressed as a Studio 54 concubine back in the 80's, don't you think that more than just an LGBTQ hack writer for Vanity Fair would be on that bandwagon and that picture and story would be splattered all over the internet to demean the Bad Orange Man? I certainly do... but guess what, it's not.
One person at one publication is saying it's Trump... that's it. Nobody else is even coming close to saying that's Trump, except you of course. A biased writer at a biased magazine misrepresented an old photo to smear a hated political opponent, and you not only swallowed it hook line and sinker, you ran hard with it.
No other writer or publication has followed suit and made the same claim... not a single one!
You know why? Because they know it's ****, just like everyone else!
Face it Rico... you got duped.
It happens... accept it and move on already.
Oh wait... you can't. You are incapable of that.
Oh well!
He very much does, child...The guy in the pic looks nothing like Trump. He just doesn't
17 Jan 2024 5:53 am
You didn't have any idea about Roy Cohn yesterday....Today you can tell me, WITH CERTAINTY, what Grifty wore in the 70s.RedheadedStranger » 16 Jan 2024, 9:13 pm » wrote: ↑ The guy in the pic looks nothing like Trump. He just doesn't... no matter how much you squint and **** on yourself wanting it to be.
.
If that were indeed Donald Trump dressed as a Studio 54 concubine back in the 80's, don't you think that more than just an LGBTQ hack writer for Vanity Fair would be on that bandwagon and that picture and story would be splattered all over the internet to demean the Bad Orange Man? I certainly do... but guess what, it's not.
One person at one publication is saying it's Trump... that's it. Nobody else is even coming close to saying that's Trump, except you of course. A biased writer at a biased magazine misrepresented an old photo to smear a hated political opponent, and you not only swallowed it hook line and sinker, you ran hard with it.
No other writer or publication has followed suit and made the same claim... not a single one!
You know why? Because they know it's ****, just like everyone else!
Face it Rico... you got duped.
It happens... accept it and move on already.
Oh wait... you can't. You are incapable of that.
Oh well!
17 Jan 2024 7:55 am
I KNOW ALL ABOUT ROY COHN AND I KNOW THAT YOU POST THAT PICTURE ALL OVER THE INTERNET KNOWING DAMN WELL THAT IS NOT TRUMP.R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 6:53 am » wrote: ↑ You didn't have any idea about Roy Cohn yesterday....Today you can tell me, WITH CERTAINTY, what Grifty wore in the 70s.
YOU ALSO POST PICTURES OF TRUMP THAT HAVE BEEN PHOTOSHOPED. 67 YEARS OLD, BALDING, AND A DISGRACE TO BROWN UNIVERSITY.
THIS IS REAL.
https://youtu.be/1yPU_5a9R1s
17 Jan 2024 8:32 am
Please direct your tears to this schooner, MAGAt...POM » 17 Jan 2024, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑ I KNOW ALL ABOUT ROY COHN AND I KNOW THAT YOU POST THAT PICTURE ALL OVER THE INTERNET KNOWING DAMN WELL THAT IS NOT TRUMP.
YOU ALSO POST PICTURES OF TRUMP THAT HAVE BEEN PHOTOSHOPED. 67 YEARS OLD, BALDING, AND A DISGRACE TO BROWN UNIVERSITY.
THIS IS REAL.
https://youtu.be/1yPU_5a9R1s
Much obliged.
17 Jan 2024 8:45 am
So... you still can't find a corroborating source to back up your claim.R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 6:53 am » wrote: ↑ You didn't have any idea about Roy Cohn yesterday....Today you can tell me, WITH CERTAINTY, what Grifty wore in the 70s.
Still hanging your "theory" on the caption of an LGBTQ whack job society writer for Vanity Fair I see.
BTW... I can present a TON of pictures of Trump from the late 70's and 80's where he is dressed in coat and tie.
How many can you produce where he is dressed like a Studio 54 concubine?
Oh yeah, that's right... ONE.
Keep looking Veggie.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
17 Jan 2024 8:54 am
I DON'T NEED TO.RedheadedStranger » 17 Jan 2024, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑ So... you still can't find a corroborating source to back up your claim.
Still hanging your "theory" on the caption of an LGBTQ whack job society writer for Vanity Fair I see.
BTW... I can present a TON of pictures of Trump from the late 70's and 80's where he is dressed in coat and tie.
How many can you produce where he is dressed like a Studio 54 concubine?
Oh yeah, that's right... ONE.
Keep looking Veggie.
You have NOTHING to contradict it.
The first item on your list makes the futility of your effort apparent.
OF COURSE you're going to insist it doesn't "look like" Grifty....but that has ZERO evidentiary value, given that you didn't even know what color The Infanta's eyes are.
You have NO GROUNDS to impugn either the medium or the author.
By all means, persist....this thread will be a chapter in the next DSM.
17 Jan 2024 8:56 am
Just one veggie.R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑ I DON'T NEED TO.
You have NOTHING to contradict it.
The first item on your list makes the futility of your effort apparent.
OF COURSE you're going to insist it doesn't "look like" Grifty....but that has ZERO evidentiary value, given that you didn't even know what color The Infanta's eyes are.
You have NO GROUNDS to impugn either the medium or the author.
By all means, persist....this thread will be a chapter in the next DSM.
Cite just one corroborating source.
You can't... because none exist.
Sorry about that pumpkin.
You're still losing.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
17 Jan 2024 8:57 am
RedheadedStranger » 17 Jan 2024, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑ Just one veggie.
Cite just one corroborating source.
You can't... because none exist.
Sorry about that pumpkin.
You're still losing.
He is in severe meltdown mode. He is even getting the threads he is posting on mixed up.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
17 Jan 2024 9:00 am
Huey » 17 Jan 2024, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑ He is in severe meltdown mode. He is even getting the threads he is posting on mixed up.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
17 Jan 2024 9:00 am
When will I see your FIRST piece of evidence?RedheadedStranger » 17 Jan 2024, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑ Just one veggie.
Cite just one corroborating source.
You can't... because none exist.
Sorry about that pumpkin.
You're still losing.
Given your demonstrated indifference to corroborating evidence, why must I find more?
17 Jan 2024 9:00 am
This is Kevin Costner... because I say it is.R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑ I DON'T NEED TO.
You have NOTHING to contradict it.
The first item on your list makes the futility of your effort apparent.
OF COURSE you're going to insist it doesn't "look like" Grifty....but that has ZERO evidentiary value, given that you didn't even know what color The Infanta's eyes are.
You have NO GROUNDS to impugn either the medium or the author.
By all means, persist....this thread will be a chapter in the next DSM.
... and I need nothing more than to say it's Kevin for it to be Kevin.
Your logic.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
17 Jan 2024 9:01 am
Huey » 17 Jan 2024, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑ He is in severe meltdown mode. He is even getting the threads he is posting on mixed up.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
17 Jan 2024 9:03 am
But it's not me saying it, Idiot..RedheadedStranger » 17 Jan 2024, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑ This is Kevin Costner... because I say it is.
... and I need nothing more than to say it's Kevin for it to be Kevin.
Your logic.
Do you accept, as @Huey does, that the dom in the tiara is Roy Cohn?
17 Jan 2024 9:05 am
Looks like Meltdown Mary is in full swing.R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑ But it's not me saying it, Idiot..
Do you accept, as Huey does, that the dom in the tiara is Roy Cohn?
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
17 Jan 2024 9:07 am
That is the dumbest question I've seen you ask yet... and that's saying something.R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑
Do you accept, as @Huey does, that the dom in the tiara is Roy Cohn?
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
17 Jan 2024 9:08 am
Looks to me like he's hoping you'll corroborate his "theory".
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
Who is online
In total there are 4465 users online :: 9 registered, 12 bots, and 4444 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, *Roshambo, Buffalo, ROG62, RebelGator, ConservativeWave, Beekeeper, SouthernFried, nefarious101
Bots: LCC, CensysInspect, MicroMessenger, CriteoBot, proximic, ADmantX, Googlebot, facebookexternalhit, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, bingbot, Applebot