Read the question again.Huey » 17 Jan 2024, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑ I don't know any of them with daddy issues. That leaves you. There is no one to exclude.
Acknowledge you were answered a second time. There will be no third.
I'm not.
you mean, like making this about me now?RedheadedStranger » 17 Jan 2024, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑ I'm not.
You, of all people, complaining about someone diverting is absolutely priceless.
No... like you diverting to me supposedly throwing Huey under the bus somehow.
R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑ Read the question again.
Bring it with you to your adult literacy class...
Try again.Excluding the ones with acute Daddy Issues, who remains?
Logic isn't proving to be one of your strengths.RedheadedStranger » 17 Jan 2024, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑ No... like you diverting to me supposedly throwing Huey under the bus somehow.
I still haven't figured out your bassackwards logic on that one yet.
You wouldn't know logic if it jumped up and bit you in the ***.R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑ Logic isn't proving to be one of your strengths.
Tough to keep track of thrower and throwee at this point..
Neither of you hesitates to acknowledge ONE of the parties identified in the photograph.
But your rejection of the second is visceral, entirely unmoored from reason...as predicted in the OP.
How **** stupid are you?RedheadedStranger » 17 Jan 2024, 11:39 am » wrote: ↑ You wouldn't know logic if it jumped up and bit you in the ***.
You just regurgitate what your told.
I am basing my position on logic and reasoning.R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑ How **** stupid are you?
The only thing you've offered so far is your word...
Google "tautology"RedheadedStranger » 17 Jan 2024, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑ I am basing my position on logic and reasoning.
You are basing yours on what you read on the Vanity Fair Society page.
How **** stupid are you?
From now on we will charge him 100 greenies every time he demands we do his work to build his case.Vegas » 17 Jan 2024, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑ You don't know the meaning of the word.
1. Question/demand of course. As always. Predictable POS.
Reasoning is thinking enlightened by logic. It can be defined more broadly so that it becomes equivalent to problem solving or critical thinking, but it becomes a special kind of thinking worth separate discussion only when the logical component is stressed.
He can't even do that right.GHETTOBLASTER » 17 Jan 2024, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑ "If you can't dazzle with brilliance....try to baffle with bull ****"
Huey » 17 Jan 2024, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑ From now on we will charge him 100 greenies every time he demands we do his work to build his case.
From what premise are you proceeding?RedheadedStranger » 17 Jan 2024, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Reasoning is thinking enlightened by logic. It can be defined more broadly so that it becomes equivalent to problem solving or critical thinking, but it becomes a special kind of thinking worth separate discussion only when the logical component is stressed.
https://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sci ... 20stressed.
KILL YOURSELFR.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑ Please direct your tears to this schooner, MAGAt...
Much obliged.
Are your Dad's eyes blue?R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑ From what premise are you proceeding?
It isn't "But Daddy's eyes aren't blue."
That's for damned sure...