YOU COME HERE TO VENT YOUR SHAME
Yup...RedheadedStranger » 18 Jan 2024, 8:06 pm » wrote: ↑ The Internet is a powerful tool buddy.
If you had done a little research before buying into a Vanity Fair Society page piece like you did, you wouldn't be getting the beat down that you are on this.
Oh well... some folks never learn.
As I have stated... myself and others have given sound logical reasons as to why that not only isn't, but can't be, Donald Trump... and all you have presented is a caption from a Vanity Fair Society piece about a movie.R.Suave » 18 Jan 2024, 8:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Yup...
And you'd think by now it would yield some actual evidence....but here you are triangulating figures in photographs, turning Grifty's eyes, gray, reading back issues of Advocate and insisting it's someone of whom a photograph is nowhere available.
You're stone cold kicking it, live.
Logic has nothing to do withRedheadedStranger » 18 Jan 2024, 8:19 pm » wrote: ↑ As I have stated... myself and others have given sound logical reasons as to why that not only isn't, but can't be, Donald Trump... and all you have presented is a caption from a Vanity Fair Society piece about a movie.
If this were being argued in a court of law before a judge and jury, you would be laughed out of the courtroom.
Sorry buddy, but them's just the facts.
You were duped. That ain't Trump.
It is not Trump. It is a recreation scene from a Studio 54 birthday party for Roy CohnRedheadedStranger » 18 Jan 2024, 8:19 pm » wrote: ↑ As I have stated... myself and others have given sound logical reasons as to why that not only isn't, but can't be, Donald Trump... and all you have presented is a caption from a Vanity Fair Society piece about a movie.
If this were being argued in a court of law before a judge and jury, you would be laughed out of the courtroom.
Sorry buddy, but them's just the facts.
You were duped. That ain't Trump.

**** ON YOUR MOTHERS GRAVE
Here is a better picture that shows the difference in height between the two men... and I'll even replay your picture for reference.R.Suave » 18 Jan 2024, 8:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Logic has nothing to do with
"This doesn't look like..."
anything premised on
"This doesn't look like..."
is entirely subjective.

NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
that is the movie recreation of this original photo.RedheadedStranger » 18 Jan 2024, 8:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Here is a better picture that shows the difference in height between the two men... and I'll even replay your picture for reference.
![]()
In the pic you claim is Trump, the two men are so close they are almost rubbing shoulders... as they are in the black and white pic I posted.
In my example, Trump is even leaning into Cohn, which would make his shoulder even lower than if he were standing up straight.
Sorry Rico, but that's not Trump in your picture. He's too short to be Trump.
My photographic evidence "trumps" your caption every day of the week and twice on Sunday.
You were duped.

NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO BEING RETARDED, DICK SUCKER!
If it is they found a dead ringer to play Cohn... and even matched his tie perfectly too.
Seeing how high a guy's shoulders are may be "intimate" to a *** like you...R.Suave » 18 Jan 2024, 8:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Dude,
Yesterday you had never heard of Roy Cohn...you've become awfully intimate with him in a short time...
Cannonpointer » 18 Jan 2024, 8:30 pm » wrote: ↑ NO BEING RETARDED, DICK SUCKER!
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
Clearly.
How do you know the guy they are calling Cohn isn't Trump?RedheadedStranger » 18 Jan 2024, 8:33 pm » wrote: ↑ If it is they found a dead ringer to play Cohn... and even matched his tie perfectly too.
One side is a little bit wider than the other in both pictures.
I believe both pics are from the actual party at Studio 54, but they just show three different concubine boys flanking Cohn... none of which are Donald Trump.