Liberal Forum

RedheadedStranger » 19 Jan 2024, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 8:50 am

Don't cry buddy.

You can't win them all... or in your case, many at all.

Your last gasp, "photometric analysis", leads to conflicting results.

R.Suave » 19 Jan 2024, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 8:53 am

Your last gasp, "photometric analysis", leads to conflicting results.

I can't help it if you're too stupid to realize you've lost.


 

R. Suave » 16 Jan 2024, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 8:20 am

 

They lose their collective **** at the sight of Roy Cohn, notorious sodomite, and his bottom.

They'll make up stories about having seen Roy Cohn bio pics which identify Roy's pet sphincter as someone OTHER than Donnie Boy. Then other MAGAts will cite these anonymous fantasists as authoritative....though they will refuse to name them.

Faced with the facts of their TVDaddy's sordid beginnings, MAGAts are overwhelmed by their Issues and lash out at your children, and late parents. Nothing is "out of bounds" when trying to cope with their grief.

But it won't change the historical fact represented by that photo.

Then there are the MAGAts so **** stupid that they have no idea who taught Grifty the 4 things he knows. **** cretins.

 

You are a reliable denier of your own time adapting as displaced. I trust everything you say or do is to convert and maintain the converted ancestors into performing as stereotype people defending typecast chain of command person pretending to be exceptional or exempt from natural time displaced forward here now.

You are a regular Devil's advocate lived to deceive everyone to believe you are more than just one ancestor adapting as displaced in plain sight. Keep performing as ancestors are taking back their sole time from people making promises of better tomorrows than genetics sustains current population left alive now evolving as eternally separated so far.

RedheadedStranger » 19 Jan 2024, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 8:54 am

I can't help it if you're too stupid to realize you've lost.

The "evidence" that I've lost:

Grifty's eyes aren't blue

Grifty is 6' 3"

Grifty wouldn't wear makeup like some bottom bitch


The facts:

The Infanta's eyes are blue

Tub o' Goo did not grow a full inch in his 70s


 
I'd describe that as Stone Cold comin' down off the top rope

R.Suave » 19 Jan 2024, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 9:01 am

 
I'd describe that as Stone Cold comin' down off the top rope

More like you bawling your eyes out over losing this argument so spectacularly.

You got duped dopey.


 

R.Suave » 18 Jan 2024, 9:21 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2024, 9:21 pm

Zzzzz

The movie is 3.99 from Amazon.

@Cedar  claims he sat through the whole thing to prove me wrong, and he saw it, but can't remember details and forgot to take a screenshot.

You might think he would have recalled Roger Stone.....but apparently not.

The movie demonstrated that the picture in question was taken before Trump and Cohn met. I didn’t watch it to prove you wrong, I watched the trailer and it looked interesting so I watched it. 

You would think someone with your means could drop $4 to watch a movie you cheap bastard.  
 

Cedar » 19 Jan 2024, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 2:46 pm

The movie demonstrated that the picture in question was taken before Trump and Cohn met. I didn’t watch it to prove you wrong, I watched the trailer and it looked interesting so I watched it. 

You would think someone with your means could drop $4 to watch a movie you cheap bastard.

When do you believe they met?
 

R.Suave » 19 Jan 2024, 2:49 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 2:49 pm

When do you believe they met?

It’s in the movie.   
 

Cedar » 19 Jan 2024, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 2:51 pm

It’s in the movie. 

Don't need to see it to know.

R.Suave » 16 Jan 2024, 8:42 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 8:42 pm

Sure looks like the dude in the tunic.

What are you, **** blind?    

R.Suave » 19 Jan 2024, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 9:01 am

The "evidence" that I've lost:

Grifty's eyes aren't blue

Grifty is 6' 3"

Grifty wouldn't wear makeup like some bottom bitch

The facts:

The Infanta's eyes are blue

Tub o' Goo did not grow a full inch in his 70s


 
I'd describe that as Stone Cold comin' down off the top rope

No, but he could have easily grown an inch between his registration papers and 1978 when your faux pic was taken...
 
 

ROG62 » 19 Jan 2024, 4:33 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 4:33 pm

What are you, **** blind?  

yES,

R.Suave » 16 Jan 2024, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 8:20 am

They lose their collective **** at the sight of Roy Cohn, notorious sodomite, and his bottom.

They'll make up stories about having seen Roy Cohn bio pics which identify Roy's pet sphincter as someone OTHER than Donnie Boy. Then other MAGAts will cite these anonymous fantasists as authoritative....though they will refuse to name them.

Faced with the facts of their TVDaddy's sordid beginnings, MAGAts are overwhelmed by their Issues and lash out at your children, and late parents. Nothing is "out of bounds" when trying to cope with their grief.

But it won't change the historical fact represented by that photo.

Then there are the MAGAts so **** stupid that they have no idea who taught Grifty the 4 things he knows. **** cretins.

I just noticed that  the original file name that the Curator / Gossip Columnist decided to name this photo is  ......"roy-cohn-sundance-film-opener"  with no mention of Trump.
No Gossip Column Archivist would fail to mention that  Trump was in this photo.
Those people have millions of photos to keep track of and there's no way some queer bitch Gossip Columnist would risk having such an important detail  getting lost in the shuffle.
Just more common sense detail that stacks up against this failed OP........  
 
 

R.Suave » 16 Jan 2024, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 8:20 am

They lose their collective **** at the sight of Roy Cohn, notorious sodomite, and his bottom.

They'll make up stories about having seen Roy Cohn bio pics which identify Roy's pet sphincter as someone OTHER than Donnie Boy. Then other MAGAts will cite these anonymous fantasists as authoritative....though they will refuse to name them.

Faced with the facts of their TVDaddy's sordid beginnings, MAGAts are overwhelmed by their Issues and lash out at your children, and late parents. Nothing is "out of bounds" when trying to cope with their grief.

But it won't change the historical fact represented by that photo.

Then there are the MAGAts so **** stupid that they have no idea who taught Grifty the 4 things he knows. **** cretins.

As a reminder how are they shoulder to shoulder in your pic but trump towers over him in this photo:



Remember last year I pointed out this height difference.

You lose.

Huey » 20 Jan 2024, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jan 2024, 11:49 am

As a reminder how are they shoulder to shoulder in your pic but trump towers over him in this photo:



Remember last year I pointed out this height difference.

You lose.

Unless Roy has a head 30% larger than SweetSweet Donny, they aren't standing shoulder to shoulder...

Huey » 20 Jan 2024, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jan 2024, 11:49 am

As a reminder how are they shoulder to shoulder in your pic but trump towers over him in this photo:



Remember last year I pointed out this height difference.

You lose.

his latest will be accusing you of being a wannabe photograph triangulation expert...   as it's highly doubtful he's ready to ghost this thread with all of the "page count" bragging...   a regular retard that boi is...
 

GHETTOBLASTER » 20 Jan 2024, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jan 2024, 11:23 am

I just noticed that  the original file name that the Curator / Gossip Columnist decided to name this photo is  ......"roy-cohn-sundance-film-opener"  with no mention of Trump.
No Gossip Column Archivist would fail to mention that  Trump was in this photo.
Those people have millions of photos to keep track of and there's no way some queer bitch Gossip Columnist would risk having such an important detail  getting lost in the shuffle.
Just more common sense detail that stacks up against this failed OP........

Probably because it attaches to a story on a movie about

Roy Cohn

which played at the

Sundance Film Festival
 

R.Suave » 20 Jan 2024, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jan 2024, 12:08 pm

Unless Roy has a head 30% larger than SweetSweet Donny, they aren't standing shoulder to shoulder...

In your pic they are.  That is "not" Donald Trump.

 

Huey » 20 Jan 2024, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jan 2024, 12:17 pm

In your pic they are.  That is "not" Donald Trump.

As much as 2ndBesty is a pinhead, they clearly cannot be, as your other photos suggest....given Roy's posture, the shot is obviously a "candid"

R.Suave » 20 Jan 2024, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jan 2024, 12:24 pm

As much as 2ndBesty is a pinhead, they clearly cannot be, as your other photos suggest....given Roy's posture, the shot is obviously a "candid"

     

Well, we know you are not one to admit your wrong.