Liberal Forum

Vegas » 17 Jan 2024, 6:19 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 6:19 pm

I made him a deal about me never falling for any of his lies and dishonest tactics. He agreed to the deal. Thereby incriminating himself by admitting that he lies and is dishonest.       

He still can't figure it out.

 
 

Vegas » 17 Jan 2024, 6:31 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 6:31 pm

Siggghhhhh....Veghead. Unless you have something meaningful to catch me on, shut the **** up.

What are words for, eh?

RedheadedStranger » 17 Jan 2024, 6:27 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 6:27 pm

Yes... being a progressive nutjob is a requirement for being an OpEd writer for Vanity Fair.

​​​​​​Did you ever find out who took the picture of Roy Cohn and the Studio 54 concubine to see if they claimed it was Donald Trump in the picture too, or are you still sticking with Mary Alice's word for it?

 ​​​​​​

 Sure...but why would you believe it?

Vegas » 17 Jan 2024, 6:19 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 6:19 pm

I made him a deal about me never falling for any of his lies and dishonest tactics. He agreed to the deal. Thereby incriminating himself by admitting that he lies and is dishonest.       

He still can't figure it out.

You yakked yourself into a month off...

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 7:32 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 7:32 pm

You yakked yourself into a month off...

Keep lying. Prove I fell for your dishonest tactics. That was the deal. Period.

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 7:27 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 7:27 pm

What are words for, eh?

Evidently to you, they are for no other reason than to lie and manipulate with. 

Vegas » 17 Jan 2024, 7:33 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 7:33 pm

Keep lying. Prove I fell for your dishonest tactics. That was the deal. Period.

I did...in your own words.

Not my problem if you don't believe you.
 

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 7:34 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 7:34 pm

I did...in your own words.

Not my problem if you don't believe you.

Are you admitting then that you were being dishonest? 

That is the whole **** point, moron. 

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 7:30 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 7:30 pm

 Sure...but why would you believe it?

If that were actually Donald Trump dressed as a Studio 54 concubine, then why is Mary Alice literally the ONLY one on the whole of the internet making the claim?

As much as the MSM and the body politic in this Country absolutely HATES the Bad Orange Man, why hasn't ANYONE ELSE picked up on this bombshell of a picture of Trump dressed up like one of Roy Cohn's *** boys?

No one is even reprinting the Vanity Fair piece for crying out loud. Not one other outlet!

Why not?

It's simple... because that's not Donald Trump.

This is how a sane person applies logic.

Everyone seems to understand that but you.

 
 

Vegas » 17 Jan 2024, 7:35 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 7:35 pm

Are you admitting then that you were being dishonest? 

That is the whole **** point, moron.

No...I'm pointing out that YOU did so, satisfying YOUR condition for your immediate departure

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 7:38 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 7:38 pm

No...I'm pointing out that YOU did so, satisfying YOUR condition for your immediate departure

How? You need to prove it. How does a **** pic with my words prove that I fell for your dishonest tactics and lies? 


Idiot. You are such a **** moron. You got yourself into a corner. I win again. 

@R. Suave  I almost forgot. I owe you a spam for your redundancy. Here you go: 


This one is good. It's about parroting. This applies to your "are these your words" incessant crap. 


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiLiDsl8sRg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiLiDsl8sRg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiLiDsl8sRg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiLiDsl8sRg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiLiDsl8sRg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiLiDsl8sRg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiLiDsl8sRg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiLiDsl8sRg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiLiDsl8sRg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiLiDsl8sRg'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiLiDsl8sRg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiLiDsl8sRg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiLiDsl8sRg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiLiDsl8sRg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiLiDsl8sRg

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 7:38 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 7:38 pm

No...I'm pointing out that YOU did so, satisfying YOUR condition for your immediate departure

 
 

RedheadedStranger » 17 Jan 2024, 7:38 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 7:38 pm

If that were actually Donald Trump dressed as a Studio 54 concubine, then why is Mary Alice literally the ONLY one on the whole of the internet making the claim?

As much as the MSM and the body politic in this Country absolutely HATES the Bad Orange Man, why hasn't ANYONE ELSE picked up on this bombshell of a picture of Trump dressed up like one of Roy Cohn's *** boys?

No one is even reprinting the Vanity Fair piece for crying out loud. Not one other outlet!

Why not?

It's simple... because that's not Donald Trump.

This is how a sane person applies logic.

Everyone seems to understand that but you.

You're welcome.

Post the text of the caption under the photo.

Vegas » 17 Jan 2024, 7:47 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 7:47 pm

@R. Suave  I

You're one of the dumbest **** alive.

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 8:10 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 8:10 pm

You're welcome.

Post the text of the caption under the photo.

Cite one other source making the claim that that's Trump in that photo and I'll shut up.

Just one.


 

RedheadedStranger » 17 Jan 2024, 8:12 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 8:12 pm

Cite one other source making the claim that that's Trump in that photo and I'll shut up.

Just one.

POST THE CAPTION.
 

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 8:07 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 8:07 am

https://www.newsweek.com/math-favors-do ... ts-1860520

Innumerate MAGAts decry the methodology

"He didn't carry the seven!"

 

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 8:12 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 8:12 pm

POST THE CAPTION.

No... you already have, repeatedly.

Post one other source making the claim.

Just one.

​​​
 

RedheadedStranger » 17 Jan 2024, 8:15 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 8:15 pm

No... you already have, repeatedly.

Post one other source making the claim.

Just one.

​​​

**** off...


The caption included the name of the photographer.

I had to tell you.

The caption lays to rest your other conspiracy theory...

SO **** POST IT.