I’ll bet you’re a blast at partiesR.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 8:25 pm » wrote: ↑ **** off...
The caption included the name of the photographer.
I had to tell you.
The caption lays to rest your other conspiracy theory...
SO **** POST IT.
That's what I thoughtR.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 8:25 pm » wrote: ↑ **** off...
The caption included the name of the photographer.
I had to tell you.
The caption lays to rest your other conspiracy theory...
SO **** POST IT.
You need help understanding the caption.
He never gets invited to parties.
Until you post clarification from the photographer herself, then you have nothing.R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 8:39 pm » wrote: ↑ You need help understanding the caption.
Post it.
Or take your L and get back under the porch.
You asked me for the name of the photographer, which was noted in the caption.RedheadedStranger » 17 Jan 2024, 8:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Until you post clarification from the photographer herself, then you have nothing.
Mary Alice wrote the caption, and credited the photographer for the pic as it appears in the film being discussed in the article.
I'm leaving you a trail of bread crumbs to try and find another source to back up your claim, but apparently it isn't working.
It isn't working, because another source backing up your claim doesn't exist.
Perhaps a side by side of Trump from the same time period and the concubine would help?
Trump has bushy eyebrows and a downward hook to his nose... neither of which the concubine has.
Also... Trump is 6'3"... and Cohn was only 5'8". In other pictures of Cohn and Trump standing beside each other, Trump towers over him. In your picture, the concubine's shoulders are almost even with Cohn's, even though Cohn isn't even standing up straight in the picture. The *** boy may be a few inches taller than Cohn, but he's certainly not 8 as Trump would have been.
Face it Rico... you were duped.
Nod
No, I asked you for a link to the photographer herself saying that's Trump, and not the nutjob that wrote the article.R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 8:56 pm » wrote: ↑ You asked me for the name of the photographer, which was noted in the caption.
Is this true?

Are these your wordsRedheadedStranger » 17 Jan 2024, 9:00 pm » wrote: ↑ No, I asked you for a link to the photographer herself saying that's Trump, and not the nutjob that wrote the article.
You're losing so badly that you've resorted to flat out lying now.
Here...
![]()
See the difference in shoulder height?
Eyes and eyebrows are different, nose is different, face shape is different, height is different
That's because it's two different people.
Nod...
![]()
Now do as you're told.Did you ever find out who took the picture of Roy Cohn and the Studio 54 concubine
I accept you concession and consider this matter closed.
As you run...RedheadedStranger » 17 Jan 2024, 9:11 pm » wrote: ↑ I accept you concession and consider this matter closed.
I may start a new thread on it in the morning and pin it just to rub it in, but we'll see.
Toodles.
When can discuss that when you get back.Vegas » 17 Jan 2024, 9:23 pm » wrote: ↑ You agreed to a deal that indicted you as a liar and a dishonest scumbag...and you participated in it to prove it.
And I am dumb?
![]()
![]()
Just run.
Dispositive of what? How many days are in "a month"? Where is your link to a calendar?Vegas » 17 Jan 2024, 5:36 pm » wrote: ↑ Ok then.
Remember: You need to post just one example of when any of your dishonest narcissistic tactics have ever worked on me.
Sound good?
@Cannonpointer If he can do it, then please ban me for a month.
Okay, now this strikes me as quite funny. ESPECIALLY funny is your framing of his slip up as having been caused by your finally having answered a question - thus throwing him off his game. As if your exhibiting normal behavior was a stratagem.
Math is at it again.R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 8:07 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.newsweek.com/math-favors-do ... ts-1860520
Innumerate MAGAts decry the methodology
"He didn't carry the seven!"