I have changed my mind about this^ photo. That is clearly donald trump.
This could get complicated by my asking, "What the **** is going on?"Cannonpointer » 18 Jan 2024, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑ Okay, now this strikes me as quite funny. ESPECIALLY funny is your framing of his slip up as having been caused by your finally having answered a question - thus throwing him off his game. As if your exhibiting normal behavior was a stratagem.
I would use as a simile him denying he has ever had a handy from a fella, and you posting a photo of him getting a handy from you.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I am too busy laughing at you AND with you to make a ruling. The contradictions and the irony are too deep and shallow all at once for my mind to get traction. I call on @Vegas to make his argument against the 30 day ban, and I then defer to my trusty associate @Deezer Shoove. I will stand by his decision.
What part of "your *** admin ran for the hills" are you having trouble comprehending, homie?DeezerShoove » 18 Jan 2024, 5:16 pm » wrote: ↑ This could get complicated by my asking, "What the **** is going on?"
That being a question Vegas will most like answer and the poster formerly known as who-gives-a-**** evading.
I essentially caused @R. Suave to admit that he is dishonest and an habitual liar. The idiot fell for it.DeezerShoove » 18 Jan 2024, 5:16 pm » wrote: ↑ This could get complicated by my asking, "What the **** is going on?"
That being a question Vegas will most likely answer and the poster formerly known as who-gives-**** evading.
He is the guy who insists that Pablo Escobar is Donald Trump.Vegas » 18 Jan 2024, 5:20 pm » wrote: ↑ I essentially caused @R. Suave to admit that he is dishonest and an habitual liar. The idiot fell for it.
I made him a deal. If he could post one example of me falling for one of his dishonest tricks or lies, then I would take off a month. He agreed and then proceeded to try and prove he was dishonest.![]()
![]()
Unfortunately for him, I never fell for his example. It was definitely a lie, but I never fell for it. At first, I couldn't believe he fell for that deal, but then I remembered who I was talking to.
Cannonpointer » 18 Jan 2024, 5:23 pm » wrote: ↑ He is the guy who insists that Pablo Escobar is Donald Trump.
Sounds incredible, even in the retelling...Vegas » 18 Jan 2024, 5:20 pm » wrote: ↑ I essentially caused @R. Suave to admit that he is dishonest and an habitual liar. The idiot fell for it.
I made him a deal. If he could post one example of me falling for one of his dishonest tricks or lies, then I would take off a month. He agreed and then proceeded to try and prove he was dishonest.![]()
![]()
Unfortunately for him, I never fell for his example. It was definitely a lie, but I never fell for it. At first, I couldn't believe he fell for that deal, but then I remembered who I was talking to.
Do your rules apply to you?
R.Suave » Today, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑
Today, 12:14 pm
A common sign of people with narcissism is the belief that they are superior to others and deserve special treatment. They believe that others should be obedient to their wishes and that the rules don't apply to them. Another common trait of narcissism is manipulative or controlling behavior.
Vegas:
I already answered that they do apply to me. I said that repeatedly. Over an over....
This is what I am going to do. You will ask that again, because you are predictable. You always do **** like that.
I will repost this after you call me a liar for saying I answered it already. Then laugh my *** off.
Who was POTUS in 2008?Vegas » 18 Jan 2024, 5:29 pm » wrote: ↑ God your memory is awful. Do you remember this from just two **** days ago?
I can post your words...Vegas » 18 Jan 2024, 5:34 pm » wrote: ↑ "retelling." Another Veghead word that he repeats 500 times a week.Same ****. Puke.
- "Are these your words?"
- "Prove it"
- Questions/demands...
Vegas » 18 Jan 2024, 5:20 pm » wrote: ↑ I essentially caused @R. Suave to admit that he is dishonest and an habitual liar. The idiot fell for it.
I made him a deal. If he could post one example of me falling for one of his dishonest tricks or lies, then I would take off a month. He agreed and then proceeded to try and prove he was dishonest.![]()
![]()
Unfortunately for him, I never fell for his example. It was definitely a lie, but I never fell for it. At first, I couldn't believe he fell for that deal, but then I remembered who I was talking to.
You didn't answer the question.Vegas » 18 Jan 2024, 5:42 pm » wrote: ↑ What is survivorship bias?
Same old redundant **** from the narcissist. Same lie.
"prove it" How about you prove it?
Here is for your redundancy...again.
Perhaps you'll reconsider the next time you're eyeing that question mark button.
Why?RedheadedStranger » 18 Jan 2024, 6:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Perhaps you'll reconsider the next time you're eyeing that question mark button.