Before we go any further, please post the core requirements for an MBA fron UC Berkeley.Skans » 17 Jan 2024, 3:57 pm » wrote: ↑ LMFAO!!! Dude, you're funny. Since you cannot apply any critical analysis to your comment, I will.
First, who is this "Professor"?Now you know that an idiot, low-IQ, NYU marketing professor (and that's debatable) is making a prediction (based on no stats, studies or anything else) about Trump's chances in Democrat-driven legal battles. You can thank me profusely, R.Suave for my critical analysis on your topic, SINCE YOU FAILED TO PROVIDE ANY WHATSOEVER!!!
- Name - Scott Galloway
- Professor of Marketing. No law degree. No Finance degree. No statistics degree. No accounting degree. Basically, how to sell Amway - Marketing.
- BA from UCLA and an MBA from UC Berkeley - **** LIBTARD MARKETING JERKOFF!!!
- Teaches "Brand Management" and "Digital Marketing" - what a freaking genius....NOT!
- Also worked for CNN - Galloway was a host on its CNN+ streaming platform, which by the way FAILED.
- Has lived in London since 2002 - so, its doubtful he even teaches **** at NYU.
- Atheist - yeah, you heard that right.
- He's a big donor to NYU and Berkley for immigrant student fellowships
- What's Galloway's biggest source for his information? " A big source of my information is — and I'm kind of embarrassed to say it — is Twitter". LOL - F'ing twitter!!!
- Galloway has campaigned for "forgiveness and amnesty for those who pushed covid lockdowns". Starting to get the flavor of **** Scott Galloway really is?
- And, what predictions did Scott Galloway make? Well, in 2021, he indicated that 2021 was the beginning of the end for Big Tech, believing that anti-trust actions are going to break up Amazon, Facebook, Google, Microsoft and Apple. HE F-ING GOT THAT WRONG, LOOOOOOOSER!!!
It Is fun watching you try.Vegas » 17 Jan 2024, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑ I am not trying. Why would I? It's your **** thread. Thus, your job. How many **** times....My God man.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk&t=237s
It's based on math.
No. He's a freaking Marketing moron. That's what he teaches. UC Berkley is a notoriously leftist university. While living in London, Marketing is what he supposedly teaches for NYU. You quoted him as an NYU professor, so let's stick with your claim as to his expertise - professor at NYU. Not dope-smoking student at Berkley.R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 4:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Before we go any further, please post the core requirements for an MBA fron UC Berkeley.
Then post the school from which Grifty earned his MBA.
So you can dispel the prevailing consensus that you have no thoughts, and are innumerate.Vegas » 17 Jan 2024, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑ I am not trying. Why would I? It's your **** thread. Thus, your job. How many **** times....My God man.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk&t=237s
Do you have an MBA?Skans » 17 Jan 2024, 4:13 pm » wrote: ↑ No. He's a freaking Marketing moron. That's what he teaches. UC Berkley is a notoriously leftist university. While living in London, Marketing is what he supposedly teaches for NYU. Personally, I don't think he teaches anything - I think that's a lie. He screws around on twitter and positions himself as an "expert" with MSNBC and CNN propagandists.
In any event, he sure as **** is not a legal scholar, has no legal background and never even applied to any lawschool.
As for Trump, you did not opine on Trump's comments about his chances in court. You opined on Scott Galloway's comments. So, you can cut that red herring loose right now.
Do you really want me to continue destroying you....... punk? Well do ya???
R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 4:15 pm » wrote: ↑ So you can dispel the prevailing consensus that you have no thoughts, and are innumerate.
Acknowledge that your question was answered, again.
I could not care less. Murica's a wreck.R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 4:13 pm » wrote: ↑ It's based on math.
Given the numbers, how would you calculate the probability of one of the criminal charges sticking?
I am not trying. Why would I?
R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 4:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Do you have an MBA?
I do....I know what the core requirements are to earn one.
They include statistics.
R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 4:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Do you have an MBA?
Irrelevant to my critical analysis of your post.
I do....I know what the core requirements are to earn one.
Irrelevant to my critical analysis of your post.
They include statistics.
Irrelevant to my critical analysis of your post.
Given the information provided, it is easy to figure out why he said so.
Unsupported. Also, irrelevant to my critical analysis of your post.
He is simply taking the conviction rates in the venues where Grifty will be appearing and arriving at a joint probability.
Unsupported. Also, this is way outside of his area of supposed expertise. Not to mention, he doesn't even have his doctorate degree. Scott Galloway is a dumb marketing professor - you know, as in how to sell deodorant and toilet paper. He has the expertise to be an Amway salesman.
R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 4:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Acknowledge that you're a moron, and that yet another of your questions waa answered.
You're a **** idiot..Vegas » 17 Jan 2024, 4:25 pm » wrote: ↑ What question did you answer? This is the second evasion.
Let's try a third...and go...
R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 4:28 pm » wrote: ↑ You're a **** idiot..
The words, following the Punctuation mark and preceding the **** Question mark.
Acknowledge that yet another of your qurstions was answered, again.
Skip that format, 'k?
Only if you ignore the core requirements to earn an MBA.Unsupported. Also, irrelevant to my critical analysis of your post.
That you are ignorant of what's required doesn't mean any child couldn't do the arithmetic, after a short explanation.Unsupported. Also, this is way outside of his area of supposed expertise
R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 4:34 pm » wrote: ↑ Skip that format, 'k?
Given the information provided, it is easy to figure out why he said so.
Only if you ignore the core requirements to earn an MBA.
He is simply taking the conviction rates in the venues where Grifty will be appearing and arriving at a joint probability.
That you are ignorant of what's required doesn't mean any child couldn't do the arithmetic, after a short explanation.
Then, as I suggested some time ago, YOU explain the probability.Vegas » 17 Jan 2024, 4:36 pm » wrote: ↑ You don't have an MBA and sure as hell don't know statistics. I already curb-stomped you multiple times.
Now shut up , liar.
I'm done throwing kippers into a hole...