Liberal Forum

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 8:07 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 8:07 am

 

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=84716

Vegas » 17 Jan 2024, 5:36 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 5:36 pm

Ok then. 

Remember: You need to post just one example of when any of your dishonest narcissistic tactics have ever worked on me. 

Sound good?

@Cannonpointer  If he can do it, then please ban me for a month.

Confirmation of Acceptance.

@Cannonpointer  

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 5:42 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 5:42 pm

Here's the first...where I insidiously answer your question, and you are struck blind...with one bold stroke, you made yourself both moron and liar..

Evidence.

@Cannonpointer  
 

Vegas » 17 Jan 2024, 5:44 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 5:44 pm

               You ******* . Do you even know what the hell you agreed to? By agreeing, you admitted that you use dishonest tactics. Which by implication, means this pic is one of your dishonest tactics, that you just agreed to. 

You dumb mother ****. God you are so easy.

Confirmation that Evidence provided satisfies Condition.

@Cannonpointer  


Is there anything else?
 

R.Suave » 01 Feb 2024, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2024, 10:48 am

The Deal

@Cannonpointer

 He still can't figure out the innuendo in this deal.   

I'll help you Cannon, you know how dishonest he is. He will leave the important info out. 


There are two parts to that deal, as you can read.
1. He first must post an example of one of his lies or dishonest tactics. 
2. He then must prove that I fell for his lie or dishonest tactic. 

The mere fact that he even posted it proves that he agrees he lied. His lie was saying that I lied. However, I have always said, since the moment he posted it, that it was a mistake on my part. He is equating 'lie' as the same as a 'mistake.' I have never once deterred from that. In fact, he even called me an illiterate moron for making that mistake. 

Thus, I never fell for his lie. 

R.Suave » 01 Feb 2024, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2024, 10:52 am

Confirmation that Evidence provided satisfies Condition.

@Cannonpointer  

Is there anything else?

Ummmmm...other than the fact that you never proved that I fell for your lie that you agreed was a lie? Small detail.   

Vegas » 01 Feb 2024, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2024, 10:57 am

Ummmmm...other than the fact that you never proved that I fell for your lie that you agreed was a lie? Small detail. 

I did.


Again, in your own words..


 
 

Vegas » 01 Feb 2024, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2024, 10:56 am

 He still can't figure out the innuendo in this deal.   

I'll help you Cannon, you know how dishonest he is. He will leave the important info out. 

There are two parts to that deal, as you can read.
1. He first must post an example of one of his lies or dishonest tactics. 
2. He then must prove that I fell for his lie or dishonest tactic. 

The mere fact that he even posted it proves that he agrees he lied. His lie was saying that I lied. However, I have always said, since the moment he posted it, that it was a mistake on my part. He is equating 'lie' as the same as a 'mistake.' I have never once deterred from that. In fact, he even called me an illiterate moron for making that mistake. 

Thus, I never fell for his lie.

@Cannonpointer  


Explain to him inwhoseendo...

R.Suave » 01 Feb 2024, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2024, 11:00 am

I did.

Again, in your own words..


 

Prove it wasn't a mistake. I have maintained that for about 600 years now. 

R.Suave » 01 Feb 2024, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2024, 11:01 am

Explain to him inwhoseendo...

What the hell are you whining about?

And **** your demands. Do your own ****. 

 

Vegas » 01 Feb 2024, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2024, 11:01 am

Prove it wasn't a mistake. I have maintained that for about 600 years now.

What "mistake"?


 

R.Suave » 01 Feb 2024, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2024, 11:03 am

What "mistake"?

Oh for God sakes. Just stop already. 

1000 greenies for that ****. 

R.Suave » 01 Feb 2024, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2024, 11:00 am

I did.

Again, in your own words..


 

If you truly understood what the deal meant, then the obvious question (which you refuse to answer) is why the hell would you post anything at all? I mean, literally anything. 

Follow thru favors a prison sentence.  Any prison sentence.  Will you jail those who jail you?

R. Suave » 19 Jan 2024, 9:46 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 9:46 am

So you don't answer questions.


That is an unambiguous symptom, you know..
 

**** liar.

Vegas » 01 Feb 2024, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2024, 11:08 am

If you truly understood what the deal meant, then the obvious question (which you refuse to answer) is why the hell would you post anything at all? I mean, literally anything.

Because I know, with bedrock certainty, that you're a moron.

By posting an example where YOU lied AND made a moron of yourself, I relied on your reflexive dishonesty and malignant narcissism to reach out of your coffin, and nail it shut around you.


 

R.Suave » 01 Feb 2024, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2024, 11:30 am

By posting an example where YOU lied 

No *******. This ^^^ right there, is where you have it backwards. 

As you would say: "ask me why."

R.Suave » 01 Feb 2024, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2024, 11:30 am

Because I know, with bedrock certainty, that you're a moron.

By posting an example where YOU lied AND made a moron of yourself, I relied on your reflexive dishonesty and malignant narcissism to reach out of your coffin, and nail it shut around you.

Lather.  Rinse.  Repeat.

den » 01 Feb 2024, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2024, 11:31 am

Lather.  Rinse.  Repeat.

What are you doing to be rid of him for a month?

Vegas » 01 Feb 2024, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2024, 11:31 am

No *******. This ^^^ right there, is where you have it backwards. 

As you would say: "ask me why."

Ask not at whom the Hangman leers..