Liberal Forum

R.Suave » 01 Feb 2024, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2024, 10:48 am

The Deal

@Cannonpointer

Okay - this is looking familiar. 

So, this was his offer - with no expectation of compensation. Basically, he put himself at risk with no gain on the horizon save a **** you to swayve.

Your brief is accepted, Counselor. You've shown a cause of action and jurisdiction. Proceed to filings. 


Seal of the Cannongaroo Court affixed hereto:

Deal: If you can post one time where I have ever fell for even one of your dishonest tactics, games, or any other narcissist trick, then I will agree to be banned for a month. 

 
 
 

R.Suave » 01 Feb 2024, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2024, 10:49 am

Acceptance of The Deal.

@Cannonpointer

Acceptance of the deal is entered into the record.

R.Suave » 01 Feb 2024, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2024, 10:50 am

Confirmation of Acceptance.

@Cannonpointer

Confirmation of acceptance entered into the record. 

I hope this is good, Counselor. I hate wasting a chub.
 

R.Suave » 01 Feb 2024, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2024, 10:51 am

Evidence.

@Cannonpointer

Evidence of what, Counselor? Tardation?

I'm going to need you to explain the relevance of this evidence.
 
 

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 4:28 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 4:28 pm

You're a **** idiot..

The words, following the Punctuation mark and preceding the **** Question mark.

Acknowledge that yet another of your qurstions was answered, again.

nod....
 

 

 

BooRadley » 11 Feb 2024, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2024, 11:13 am

R.Suave » 11 Feb 2024, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2024, 11:04 am

What did I tell you, Hole?

Don't run your **** Troll 101 crap on me..

You aren't nearly good enough.

So you claimed Trump is totally broke...

But when asked for a link to that you can't come up with it...

 

 

 

BooRadley » 11 Feb 2024, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2024, 11:03 am

R.Suave » 11 Feb 2024, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2024, 11:00 am

No, Hole.

What did I tell you?

So you're answer is "NO" you never said Trump has been broke a few times correct?
 

 

What did I tell you, Hole?

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 8:07 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 8:07 am

https://www.newsweek.com/math-favors-do ... ts-1860520

Innumerate MAGAts decry the methodology

"He didn't carry the seven!"

@Blackvegetable  


This one definitely didn't age well.  What are those words you toss around for people who believe this type crap....oh...yeah...**** Rubes.

*Huey » 13 Jan 2025, 2:49 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 2:49 pm

@Blackvegetable  

This one definitely didn't age well.  What are those words you toss around for people who believe this type crap....oh...yeah...**** Rubes.

Blahahahaha 

BuckNaked » 13 Jan 2025, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 2:51 pm

Blahahahaha

Jail time?   

*Huey » 13 Jan 2025, 2:49 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 2:49 pm

@Blackvegetable  

This one definitely didn't age well.  What are those words you toss around for people who believe this type crap....oh...yeah...**** Rubes.

You're a **** idiot. It was only the office that kept him out of jail.

I noticed that FOX gave scant coverage to the sentencing.

 

Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2025, 2:56 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 2:56 pm

You're a **** idiot. It was only the office that kept him out of jail.

I noticed that FOX gave scant coverage to the sentencing.

But you don't watch FOX.  Interesting.  You mean you weren't told what to think about the FOX coverage.

*Huey » 13 Jan 2025, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 2:57 pm

But you don't watch FOX.  Interesting.  You mean you weren't told what to think about the FOX coverage.

**** idiot...it was on one of 6 screens within 10 feet of my face the day of the sentencing.

Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2025, 2:59 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 2:59 pm

**** idiot...it was on one of 6 screens within 10 feet of my face the day of the sentencing.

Oh, you are talking about a 45 minute or time period.  Where you can't hear.  

 

*Huey » 13 Jan 2025, 3:00 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 3:00 pm

Oh, you are talking about a 45 minute or time period.  Where you can't hear.

 

Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2025, 3:01 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 3:01 pm

Like a said, one block of time that is 40 minutes long or so and cover MULTIPLE topics.  Nice try, bonehead.

*Huey » 13 Jan 2025, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 3:03 pm

Like a said, one block of time that is 40 minutes long or so and cover MULTIPLE topics.  Nice try, bonehead.

Tiny,

How much of Judge Kaplan's respose to Team Grifty's post verdict decision have you read?

How much of the sworn testimony before the Jan 6th Commission did you watch?



 

Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2025, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 3:06 pm

Tiny,

How much of Judge Kaplan's respose to Team Grifty's post verdict decision have you read?

How much of the sworn testimony before the Jan 6th Commission did you watch?

I have read a good deal and I have also posted the pertinent parts of it upon your request. Unlike who refuses to post the answer to question one on the Jury Verdict form.  

Bottom Line, I was right from day one that Trump was not going to sentenced to jail time.  I was not so certain that the law fare to keep him of office, what you lie and say did not exist, would fail to keep him out of office.

Now, as I have the time, I will get to go thru your other SOKPUPPET's posts.  Those of Blackvegetable.  This is gonna be a sweet in your face game, Huckleberry.

*Huey » 13 Jan 2025, 3:09 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 3:09 pm

I have read a good deal and I have also posted the pertinent parts of it upon your request. Unlike who refuses to post the answer to question one on the Jury Verdict form.  

Bottom Line, I was right from day one that Trump was not going to sentenced to jail time.  I was not so certain that the law fare to keep him of office, what you lie and say did not exist, would fail to keep him out of office.

Now, as I have the time, I will get to go thru your other SOKPUPPET's posts.  Those of Blackvegetable.  This is gonna be a sweet in your face game, Huckleberry.

I have read a good deal and I have also posted the pertinent parts of it upon your request

you haven't read ANY of it, lying little sack of ****.

Bottom Line, I was right from day one that Trump was not going to sentenced to jail time

Tiny, please...had he not been elected, he'd be decorating a jail cell.

This is gonna be a sweet in your face game, Huckleberry.

there'll be some gems, I'm sure...

You already unearthed one.

Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2025, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 3:15 pm

you haven't read ANY of it, lying little sack of ****.

Tiny, please...had he not been elected, he'd be decorating a jail cell.

there'll be some gems, I'm sure...

You already unearthed one.

         

Whenever an answer disagrees with your rant you claim the poster is lying.  

No, he would not be doing jail time.

*Huey » 13 Jan 2025, 3:16 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 3:16 pm

         

Whenever an answer disagrees with your rant you claim the poster is lying.  

No, he would not be doing jail time.

Tiny,

You've never denied that you haven't read it..

Whenever an answer disagrees with your rant you claim the poster is lying. 

You lie all the time.