Liberal Forum

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 5:44 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 5:44 pm

You should revisit your archives once you sober up.

Why? I know what I said... and my position is the same now as it was when I started... and my boot is still firmly planted in your *** too.

 
 

RedheadedStranger » 17 Jan 2024, 5:45 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 5:45 pm

Why? I know what I said... and my position is the same now as it was when I started... and my boot is still firmly planted in your *** too.

So do I...hence the advice.

Vegas » 17 Jan 2024, 5:44 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 5:44 pm

               You ******* . Do you even know what the hell you agreed to? By agreeing, you admitted that you use dishonest tactics. Which by implication, means this pic is one of your dishonest tactics, that you just agreed to. 

You dumb mother ****. God you are so easy.

If you acknowledge it is a dishonest tactic, I'll see you in a month.

Z09 » 17 Jan 2024, 5:39 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 5:39 pm

He's not going to prison you idiot..

Given the data, what are the odds, Hole?

Vegas » 17 Jan 2024, 5:36 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 5:36 pm

Ok then. 

Remember: You need to post just one example of when any of your dishonest narcissistic tactics have ever worked on me. 

Sound good?

@Cannonpointer  If he can do it, then please ban me for a month.

Please ban him for a month, according to his wishes.

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 5:46 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 5:46 pm

So do I...hence the advice.

Your position came from the Vanity Fair Society page.
 

 

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 5:49 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 5:49 pm

Please ban him for a month, according to his wishes.

It was a pic. What dishonest tactic I fall for? 

 
 

Z09 » 17 Jan 2024, 5:51 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 5:51 pm

I recall the Trump haters saying he'd be led out of the WH in handcuffs...

Christ..
He's not going to jail

It's all BS

I'm looking for a number, Hole.

Z09 » 17 Jan 2024, 5:57 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 5:57 pm

Ever find the pee tapes?

Have you found that number, Hole?

Vegas » 17 Jan 2024, 5:51 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 5:51 pm

It was a pic. What dishonest tactic I fall for?

More questions..

You owe me acknowledgements for a number of answers.


 

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 4:39 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 4:39 pm

Then, as I suggested some time ago, YOU explain the probability.

You know my rules:
1. Acknowledge that you don't know.
2  Ask me nicely. 

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 5:57 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 5:57 pm

I'm looking for a number, Hole.

https://youtu.be/f1ab6uxg908?si=b1sb6urtxdJ6hClf


 

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 5:59 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 5:59 pm

More questions..

You owe me acknowledgements for a number of answers.

Given the ratio between your evasions vs your answers...ummmm no. I don't owe you ****. 

RedheadedStranger » 17 Jan 2024, 5:50 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 5:50 pm

Your position came from the Vanity Fair Society page.

A captioned photograph.

Yours?

Logic doesn't follow
"Nooooooo, that big fruit doesn't look like my DreamDaddy!".
 

Vegas » 17 Jan 2024, 6:00 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 6:00 pm

Given the ratio between your evasions vs your answers...ummmm no. I don't owe you ****.

Prove it.

RedheadedStranger » 17 Jan 2024, 6:00 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 6:00 pm

https://youtu.be/f1ab6uxg908?si=b1sb6urtxdJ6hClf

Please bookmark that.

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 6:02 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 6:02 pm

Prove it.

Prove you answer questions the first time around....habitually. 

I already had this convo with you, you run away every time. Spam incoming for the redundancy. 

Vegas » 17 Jan 2024, 5:51 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 5:51 pm

It was a pic. What dishonest tactic I fall for?

Are these your words?

By agreeing, you admitted that you use dishonest tactics. Which by implication, means this pic is one of your dishonest tactics, that you just agreed to.

Bye!

Vegas » 17 Jan 2024, 5:59 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 5:59 pm

You know my rules:
1. Acknowledge that you don't know.
2  Ask me nicely.

I DO know.

Get crackin', bitch!

Now!
 

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 6:06 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 6:06 pm

Are these your words?

Bye!

And? You still didn't answer which dishonest tactic of yours I fell for. 

Therefore, you lose. You also agreed that you lie just by agreeing to the deal. 


Idiot. 


1. Here comes the pic: mistake vs lie....blah blah blah. More redundancy.