Liberal Forum

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 6:01 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 6:01 pm

A captioned photograph.

Yours?

Logic doesn't follow
"Nooooooo, that big fruit doesn't look like my DreamDaddy!".

A photograph captioned by a progressive nutjob on the Vanity Fair Society page.

Nod

 

 
 

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 6:08 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 6:08 pm

I DO know.

Get crackin', bitch!

Now!

Nope. You don't. Which is why you refuse to prove it. 

Always turning it on someone else like the good little narcissist you are.

 

Vegas » 17 Jan 2024, 6:08 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 6:08 pm

And? You still didn't answer which dishonest tactic of yours I fell for. 

Therefore, you lose. You also agreed that you lie just by agreeing to the deal. 

Idiot. 

1. Here comes the pic: mistake vs lie....blah blah blah. More redundancy.

No...you "proved" it was a "dishonest tactic".

in your own words.

Bye
 

Vegas » 17 Jan 2024, 6:09 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 6:09 pm

Nope. You don't. Which is why you refuse to prove it. 

Always turning it on someone else like the good little narcissist you are.

It's simple.

The events are independent and NOT mutually exclusive..

Now show the math.

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 6:12 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 6:12 pm

No...you "proved" it was a "dishonest tactic".

in your own words.

Bye

You proved it by posting it as part of the deal. Im asking what exactly did I fall for. 

We both know you won't answer...because it was a question. Lol


You lose. Bye.

RedheadedStranger » 17 Jan 2024, 6:09 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 6:09 pm

A photograph captioned by a progressive nutjob on the Vanity Fair Society page.

Nod

"Progressive nutjob"?

More "logic"?
 

Vegas » 17 Jan 2024, 6:09 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 6:09 pm

Nope. You don't. Which is why you refuse to prove it. 

Always turning it on someone else like the good little narcissist you are.

Don't forget... you're dealing with a demigod there.

 
 

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 6:14 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 6:14 pm

It's simple.

The events are independent and NOT mutually exclusive..

Now show the math.

Its your math. Stop **** stalling. 

1. You will continue to refuse to show the math of your own **** article by turning it on me. 


See? Like I said, I have never fallen for your narcissitic games. Not once. 

Vegas » 17 Jan 2024, 6:14 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 6:14 pm

You proved it by posting it as part of the deal. Im asking what exactly did I fall for. 

We both know you won't answer...because it was a question. Lol

You lose. Bye.

What you insist is a "dishonest tactic"...

In your own words.

I can appreciate that you are aghast at your stupidity, but here you are.
 

RedheadedStranger » 17 Jan 2024, 6:16 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 6:16 pm

Don't forget... you're dealing with a demigod there.

I made him a deal about me never falling for any of his lies and dishonest tactics. He agreed to the deal. Thereby incriminating himself by admitting that he lies and is dishonest.       


He still can't figure it out. 

Vegas » 17 Jan 2024, 6:16 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 6:16 pm

Its your math. Stop **** stalling. 

1. You will continue to refuse to show the math of your own **** article by turning it on me. 

See? Like I said, I have never fallen for your narcissitic games. Not once.

It's simply additive, as you are only looking for one successful prosecution in any venue.

Nod.


 

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 6:17 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 6:17 pm

What you insist is a "dishonest tactic"...

In your own words.

I can appreciate that you are aghast at your stupidity, but here you are.

You are the one that posted as part of the deal regrading an example of your dishonesty. 

You **** up. You admitted that you are a lying sack of ****. 


1. Prove it....I literally just did. So shut up.

Vegas » 17 Jan 2024, 6:19 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 6:19 pm

I made him a deal about me never falling for any of his lies and dishonest tactics. He agreed to the deal. Thereby incriminating himself by admitting that he lies and is dishonest.       

He still can't figure it out.

Tell him what tactic that was...

Then take off.

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 6:19 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 6:19 pm

It's simply additive, as you are only looking for one successful prosecution in any venue.

Nod.

Veghead. We both know that you won't do the math. 

We also both know that you will always turn it on me...its what you do. 

Abide by my 2 rules, and I will do it for you. 

Vegas » 17 Jan 2024, 6:20 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 6:20 pm

You are the one that posted as part of the deal regrading an example of your dishonesty. 

You **** up. You admitted that you are a lying sack of ****. 

1. Prove it....I literally just did. So shut up.

Whose words are these?

By agreeing, you admitted that you use dishonest tactics. Which by implication, means this pic is one of your dishonest tactics, that you just agreed to.

 

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 6:20 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 6:20 pm

Tell him what tactic that was...

Then take off.

You tell him. You are the one that admitted to it all. Lol

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 6:22 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 6:22 pm

Whose words are these?

Jesus. Stop posting **** that doesn't prove anything. God man. You do that stupid **** incessantly

1. More "are these your words" crap. 

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 6:15 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 6:15 pm

"Progressive nutjob"?

More "logic"?

Yes... being a progressive nutjob is a requirement for being an OpEd writer for Vanity Fair.

​​​​​​Did you ever find out who took the picture of Roy Cohn and the Studio 54 concubine to see if they claimed it was Donald Trump in the picture too, or are you still sticking with Mary Alice's word for it?

 ​​​​​​
 

Vegas » 17 Jan 2024, 6:24 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 6:24 pm

Jesus. Stop posting **** that doesn't prove anything. God man. You do that stupid **** incessantly

1. More "are these your words" crap.

You're arguing that your words don't say anything.

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 6:29 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 6:29 pm

You're arguing that your words don't say anything.

Siggghhhhh....Veghead. Unless you have something meaningful to catch me on, shut the **** up.