Liberal Forum

GHETTOBLASTER » 17 Jan 2024, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 9:15 am

Get a load of the Serial Lying Libtard  lecture the rest of   us about telling the truth....^^^^^^  

Didn't you just offer 3 dead links as Evidence?

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 8:17 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 8:17 am

How does Bias explain the presence of classified docs at Mar a Lago?
Bias explains that the so-called documents he had would never have been deemed "classified" by a law enforcement agency after Trump declassified all of those documents.  Instead, an UNBIASED law enforcement agency, if they had real concerns about the documents, would have first gone to the courts to have it determined whether or not they are really classified, and whether or not Trump can be compelled to turn them over. 

 

Or why Grifty obstructed justice by hiding documents under subpoena...
Because, the subpoena could be invalid.  This has been proven during the Russian Collusion investigations where the FBI obtained subpoenas from the FISA court which were later determined to be fraud.  Again, another reason to have the retention of documents fully decided by the court BEFORE the FBI takes any enforcement action.   Because they didn't do that, it shows bias on the part of the DOJ and FBI.  

 

Or why Grifty shared classified info with anyone willing to talk to him.
No court has reviewed evidence and made this determination.  Therefore you are just making this **** up.

Crow is not Chicken  - - now eat up, chump!! 
 
 

ConsRule » 17 Jan 2024, 9:13 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 9:13 am

Proof?

Careful...remember Slick Willy was POTUS.

“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.

 He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... udge-rape/

What have you got?

Careful...remember Slick Willy was POTUS.

And Ronald Reagan preceded him.

Your point?


Acknowledge that you were answered

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 9:20 am

Didn't you just offer 3 dead links as Evidence?

Here are the stories that a serial liar such as yourself you is still  trying to claim  never existed.....

Looks like we're 3 for 3 in proving what a truth hating POS Black Veg is.
My earlier post  [and claims] stand proud [there was never any doubt]
Read and Weep...!!

by WorldTribune Staff, October 13, 2021

In a Sept. 23 deposition, Eric Coomer, the former director of security and product strategy for Dominion Voting Systems, said that Dominion shared his extreme leftist beliefs and that he only “screwed up” because he allowed the political right to make him the “perfect villain.”

Coomer has filed lawsuits against 15 organizations and people, including attorney Sidney Powell and former Tech CEO Joe Oltmann, for defamation in his home state of Colorado.

Eric Coomer
That expensive legal offensive has had the effect of deterring and silencing minority conservative media reporting on the evidence of not only mail-in ballot irregularities but the poorly-understood role of Internet-connected election equipment and software in the tabulation and adjudication of voting data.

Coomer claims to have been defamed by journalists who allegedly said he was tied to Antifa, and that he helped rig the 2020 election against President Donald Trump.

He became known to the world courtesy of Oltmann’s investigation of Antifa as detailed in his interview with WorldTribune columnist Michele Malkin.

 
 

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 9:19 am

“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.

 He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... udge-rape/

More deflection ....




 

GHETTOBLASTER » 17 Jan 2024, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 9:24 am

Here are the stories that a serial liar such as yourself you is still  trying to claim here never existed.....

Looks like we're 3 for 3 in proving what a truth hating POS Black Veg is.
My earlier post  [and claims] stand proud [there was never any doubt]
Read and Weep...!!

by WorldTribune Staff, October 13, 2021

In a Sept. 23 deposition, Eric Coomer, the former director of security and product strategy for Dominion Voting Systems, said that Dominion shared his extreme leftist beliefs and that he only “screwed up” because he allowed the political right to make him the “perfect villain.”

Coomer has filed lawsuits against 15 organizations and people, including attorney Sidney Powell and former Tech CEO Joe Oltmann, for defamation in his home state of Colorado.

Eric Coomer
That expensive legal offensive has had the effect of deterring and silencing minority conservative media reporting on the evidence of not only mail-in ballot irregularities but the poorly-understood role of Internet-connected election equipment and software in the tabulation and adjudication of voting data.

Coomer claims to have been defamed by journalists who allegedly said he was tied to Antifa, and that he helped rig the 2020 election against President Donald Trump.

He became known to the world courtesy of Oltmann’s investigation of Antifa as detailed in his interview with WorldTribune columnist Michele Malkin.

Every single one has been withdrawn.

Mad Dog Malkin has been euthanized.

Majik » 17 Jan 2024, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 9:25 am

More deflection ....

That's a DETERMINATION.
 

R.Suave » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑5 minutes ago
Didn't you just offer 3 dead links as Evidence?

Here are the stories that a serial liar such as yourself you is still trying to claim never existed.....

Records: Too many votes in 37% of Detroit’s precincts
Joel Kurth, and Jonathan OostingThe Detroit News

Voting machines in more than one-third of all Detroit precincts registered more votes than they should have during last month’s presidential election, according to Wayne County records prepared at the request of The Detroit News.

Detailed reports from the office of Wayne County Clerk Cathy Garrett show optical scanners at 248 of the city’s 662 precincts, or 37 percent, tabulated more ballots than the number of voters tallied by workers in the poll books. Voting irregularities in Detroit have spurred plans for an audit by Michigan Secretary of State Ruth Johnson’s office, Elections Director Chris Thomas said Monday.

Detroit’s voting irregularities spur state audit

Same deal some text into a search and the link comes back to life you truth hating piece of ****.....
Oh..the official excuse for the massive fraud here is that at each of the precincts where fraud was discovered it was because the ****** can't count or else are too incompetent...

Skans » 17 Jan 2024, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 9:20 am

Crow is not Chicken  - - now eat up, chump!!

 Why do you think the uninformed crap you spit up constitutes "crow"?


 

R.Suave » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑5 minutes ago
Didn't you just offer 3 dead links as Evidence?

Here are the stories that a serial liar such as yourself you is still trying to claim never existed.....

Here's text from one of the links right here....
'Online and vulnerable': Experts find nearly three dozen U.S. voting systems connected to internet
"A team of election security experts used a “Google for servers” to challenge claims that voting machines do not connect to the internet and found some did.By Kevin Monahan, Cynthia McFadden and Didi MartinezIt was an assurance designed to bolster public confidence in the way America votes: Voting machines “are not connected to the internet.”Then Acting Undersecretary for Cybersecurity and Communications at the Department of Homeland Security Jeanette Manfra said those words in 2017, testifying before Congress while she was responsible for the security of the nation’s voting system.So many government officials like Manfra have said the same thing over the last few years that it is commonly accepted as gospel by most Americans. Behind it is the notion that if voting systems are not online, hackers will have a harder time compromising them.But that is an overstatement, according to a team of 10 independent cybersecurity experts who specialize in voting systems and elections. While the voting machines themselves are not designed to be online, the larger voting systems in many states end up there, putting the voting process at risk.That team of election security experts say that last summer, they discovered some systems are, in fact, online.“We found over 35 [voting systems] had been left online and we’re still continuing to find more,” Kevin Skoglund, a senior technical advisor at the election security advocacy group National Election Defense Coalition, told NBC News."

Now paste the first sentence into a search and the link works perfectly.!!
Boy it only took me a minute to prove what a truth hating piece of **** you are and I haven't even had my coffee yet...!!!

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 9:26 am

That's a DETERMINATION.

Yep....full of political bias .....
Which is why Civil suits are bottom of the barrel when it comes to lawfare......
 
 

ConsRule » 17 Jan 2024, 9:12 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 9:12 am

Because you listed more than one action.  This may come as an emotional shock, but I don't have to clear my choice of words through you.

No one said you did, ******....settle down.

Calling them "things" is deliberately vague. We both know why you do so.


 

Majik » 17 Jan 2024, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 9:30 am

Yep....full of political bias .....
Which is why Civil suits are bottom of the barrel when it comes to lawfare......

No...that was the conclusion of a JURY, after it heard the EVIDENCE.

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 9:30 am

No one said you did, ******....settle down.

Calling them "things" is deliberately vague. We both know why you do so.
 

In you opinion.  My opinion differs...deal with it.

 

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 9:30 am

No...that was the conclusion of a JURY, after it heard the EVIDENCE.

In what jurisdiction.... asshole?
 

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 9:26 am

Every single one has been withdrawn.

Mad Dog Malkin has been euthanized.

All 3 stories are every bit as valid as the day they were originally published.
Let's see you debunk ANY of them with your proof that they are false.
We both know that you can't...but go ahead to tell  yourself that you could "If you wanted to"....!!!

 


 

GHETTOBLASTER » 17 Jan 2024, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 9:34 am

All 3 stories are every bit as valid as the day they were originally published.
Let's see you debunk ANY of them with your proof that they are false.
We both know that you can't...but go ahead to tell  yourself that you could "If you wanted to"....!!!

If they were, THEY WOULD STILL BE UP, ya stupid piece of ****.

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 9:35 am

If they were, THEY WOULD STILL BE UP, ya stupid piece of ****.

GHETTOBLASTER » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑
1 minute ago
All 3 stories are every bit as valid as the day they were originally published.
Let's see you debunk ANY of them with your proof that they are false.
We both know that you can't...but go ahead to tell  yourself that you could "If you wanted to"....!!!

 

Majik » 17 Jan 2024, 9:31 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 9:31 am

In what jurisdiction.... asshole?

The one in which the offense occurred...

GHETTOBLASTER » 17 Jan 2024, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 9:36 am

GHETTOBLASTER » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑
1 minute ago
All 3 stories are every bit as valid as the day they were originally published.
Let's see you debunk ANY of them with your proof that they are false.
We both know that you can't...but go ahead to tell  yourself that you could "If you wanted to"....!!!

3 of 3...

That's impossible...

Unless you are dealing with a slack jawed rube...