Liberal Forum

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 8:17 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 8:17 am

How does Bias explain the presence of classified docs at Mar a Lago?

Or why Grifty obstructed justice by hiding documents under subpoena...

Or why Grifty shared classified info with anyone willing to talk to him.

MAGAts?

4 **** questions. Four. God man. 

He won't give 4 thoughts of his own on his own article, but he has no problem turning it around on other 4 different times. 


No thoughts, etc...

Spam incoming. Get ready. 

DeezerShoove » 17 Jan 2024, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 8:22 am

Your title should be "dinnah", ****.

Hope this helps.

 
 

RebelGator » 17 Jan 2024, 8:24 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 8:24 am

Never get between a niggah and a chikin dinnah.

 

Hundreds of thousands of top secret docs in trumps bathroom.

ConsRule » 17 Jan 2024, 9:31 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 9:31 am

In you opinion.  My opinion differs...deal with it.

It's not about "opinion".

If you call them "things", it's easy to argue that "everybody did it".

If you call it what it is, specifically

• Willful retention of national defense information
• False statements and representations
• Conspiracy to obstruct justice
• Withholding a document or record
• Corruptly concealing a document or record
• Concealing a document in a federal investigation
• Scheme to conceal
• Altering, destroying, mutilating, or concealing an object
• Corruptly altering, destroying, mutilating, or concealing a document, record, or other object

Then the comparisons become a bit of a challenge.

**** idiot.



 

RedheadedStranger » 17 Jan 2024, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 8:49 am

wait, wuuuuuuut?

GHETTOBLASTER » 17 Jan 2024, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 9:36 am

GHETTOBLASTER » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑
1 minute ago
All 3 stories are every bit as valid as the day they were originally published.
Let's see you debunk ANY of them with your proof that they are false.
We both know that you can't...but go ahead to tell  yourself that you could "If you wanted to"....!!!

There's NOTHING to debunk.


 

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 9:08 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 9:08 am

There's the first time for everything..

Grifty is the first POTUS rapist...

ABIDE!

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 9:19 am

“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.

 He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... udge-rape/

WaPo...  
 

Skans » 17 Jan 2024, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 9:20 am

Crow is not Chicken  - - now eat up, chump!!

       

ROG62 » 17 Jan 2024, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 9:45 am

WaPo...

This is how **** stupid you are...

Not only does the text CLEARLY indicate that they are the words of the presiding judge.....they even place the words IN QUOTATION MARKS.

Rog,

Tell everyone the function of quotation marks...


MAGAts are so **** stupid....
 

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 9:48 am

This is how **** stupid you are...

Not only does the text CLEARLY indicate that they are the words of the presiding judge.....they even place the words IN QUOTATION MARKS.

Rog,

Tell everyone the function of quotation marks...

MAGAts are so **** stupid....

They are proud they are so dumb. 

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 9:28 am

 Why do you think the uninformed crap you spit up constitutes "crow"?

eat **** then...RN
 

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 9:48 am

This is how **** stupid you are...

Not only does the text CLEARLY indicate that they are the words of the presiding judge.....they even place the words IN QUOTATION MARKS.

Rog,

Tell everyone the function of quotation marks...

MAGAts are so **** stupid....

Where are your thoughts? I see a **** load of **** questions, but no thoughts. 

And of course, you will demand:  "Post yours" to which I reply "It's your thread, so post yours."  Blah blah blah 

So **** tired of how predictable you are. Piece of ****. 

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 9:30 am

No one said you did, ******....settle down.

Calling them "things" is deliberately vague. We both know why you do so.

^^^ vagueboi shisself calling someone vague....          
 

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 9:43 am

There's NOTHING to debunk.

Here's text from one of the links right here....
'Online and vulnerable': Experts find nearly three dozen U.S. voting systems connected to internet
"A team of election security experts used a “Google for servers” to challenge claims that voting machines do not connect to the internet and found some did.By Kevin Monahan, Cynthia McFadden and Didi MartinezIt was an assurance designed to bolster public confidence in the way America votes: Voting machines “are not connected to the internet.”Then Acting Undersecretary for Cybersecurity and Communications at the Department of Homeland Security Jeanette Manfra said those words in 2017, testifying before Congress while she was responsible for the security of the nation’s voting system.So many government officials like Manfra have said the same thing over the last few years that it is commonly accepted as gospel by most Americans. Behind it is the notion that if voting systems are not online, hackers will have a harder time compromising them.But that is an overstatement, according to a team of 10 independent cybersecurity experts who specialize in voting systems and elections. While the voting machines themselves are not designed to be online, the larger voting systems in many states end up there, putting the voting process at risk.That team of election security experts say that last summer, they discovered some systems are, in fact, online.“We found over 35 [voting systems] had been left online and we’re still continuing to find more,” Kevin Skoglund, a senior technical advisor at the election security advocacy group National Election Defense Coalition, told NBC News."

Now paste the first sentence into a search and the link works perfectly.!!
Boy it only took me a minute to prove what a truth hating piece of **** you are and I haven't even had my coffee yet...!!!
 

@R. Suave  here we go. You brought this **** on yourself. 

You love being redundant so much, no problem. Here is some redundancy for you:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_JSlDdEcKk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_JSlDdEcKk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_JSlDdEcKk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_JSlDdEcKk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_JSlDdEcKk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_JSlDdEcKk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_JSlDdEcKk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_JSlDdEcKk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_JSlDdEcKk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_JSlDdEcKk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_JSlDdEcKk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_JSlDdEcKk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_JSlDdEcKk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_JSlDdEcKk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_JSlDdEcKk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_JSlDdEcKk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_JSlDdEcKk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_JSlDdEcKk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_JSlDdEcKk

R.Suave » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑12 minutes ago
There's NOTHING to debunk.

Records: Too many votes in 37% of Detroit’s precincts
Joel Kurth, and Jonathan OostingThe Detroit News

Voting machines in more than one-third of all Detroit precincts registered more votes than they should have during last month’s presidential election, according to Wayne County records prepared at the request of The Detroit News.

Detailed reports from the office of Wayne County Clerk Cathy Garrett show optical scanners at 248 of the city’s 662 precincts, or 37 percent, tabulated more ballots than the number of voters tallied by workers in the poll books. Voting irregularities in Detroit have spurred plans for an audit by Michigan Secretary of State Ruth Johnson’s office, Elections Director Chris Thomas said Monday.

Detroit’s voting irregularities spur state audit

Same deal some text into a search and the link comes back to life you truth hating piece of ****.....
Oh..the official excuse for the massive fraud here is that at each of the precincts where fraud was discovered it was because the ****** can't count or else are too incompetent...

GHETTOBLASTER » 17 Jan 2024, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 9:55 am

Here's text from one of the links right here....
'Online and vulnerable': Experts find nearly three dozen U.S. voting systems connected to internet
"A team of election security experts used a “Google for servers” to challenge claims that voting machines do not connect to the internet and found some did.By Kevin Monahan, Cynthia McFadden and Didi MartinezIt was an assurance designed to bolster public confidence in the way America votes: Voting machines “are not connected to the internet.”Then Acting Undersecretary for Cybersecurity and Communications at the Department of Homeland Security Jeanette Manfra said those words in 2017, testifying before Congress while she was responsible for the security of the nation’s voting system.So many government officials like Manfra have said the same thing over the last few years that it is commonly accepted as gospel by most Americans. Behind it is the notion that if voting systems are not online, hackers will have a harder time compromising them.But that is an overstatement, according to a team of 10 independent cybersecurity experts who specialize in voting systems and elections. While the voting machines themselves are not designed to be online, the larger voting systems in many states end up there, putting the voting process at risk.That team of election security experts say that last summer, they discovered some systems are, in fact, online.“We found over 35 [voting systems] had been left online and we’re still continuing to find more,” Kevin Skoglund, a senior technical advisor at the election security advocacy group National Election Defense Coalition, told NBC News."

Now paste the first sentence into a search and the link works perfectly.!!
Boy it only took me a minute to prove what a truth hating piece of **** you are and I haven't even had my coffee yet...!!!

Why must I address a story its source has withdrawn?

Bidencrimefamily » 17 Jan 2024, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 9:41 am

Hundreds of thousands of top secret docs in trumps bathroom.