Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Media Gatekeepers and the Anti-Trump Agenda...
Media Gatekeepers and the Anti-Trump Agenda...
By ROG62
17 Jan 2024 11:53 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
17 Jan 2024 11:53 am
MSNBC’s live coverage of the Hawkeye State’s GOP caucus results was replete with updates and factoids; what it did not deign to show, however, was Trump speaking live. In fact, host Rachel Madcow even acknowledged the network has in place an anti-Trump policy when it comes to live newscasts. She was quite open in saying the outlet is not willing to allow the former president to appear unfiltered:
The first: The audience might begin to question the accuracy of the reporting they consume. The second: Listeners might begin to think for themselves instead of relying on the high priests and priestesses of leftist media to tell them what is newsworthy and what is truth. How much of their captive audience would they retain if either of those came to pass?
https://www.libertynation.com/media-gat ... efing-link
surprised the madcow still grunts on teevee...
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime”
LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened."
brown's unheeded words of wisdom 
If Trump were of no import, why would the above-the-fold content on MSNBC’s digital site the day after the Iowa caucuses include six out of 13 headlines (46%) focused on him? In fact, if we consider stories that are tangentially about Trump, the figure rises to 11 out of 13 (84%). So, Maddow’s suggestion that his speech was not necessarily newsworthy is clearly false.Her rationale only got worse:“The projected winner of the Iowa caucus has just started giving his victory speech. We will keep an eye on that as it happens; we will let you know if there’s any news made in that speech; if there’s anything noteworthy, something substantive or informative … ”
Narrative UnleashedTrump's Trials and Biden's Fall From GraceThe Trump-Russia collusion deception, the “fine people” hoax, the “dictator from day one” nonsense, the “wishing for an economic collapse” delusion. If MSNBC’s viewers could hear an unfiltered Trump, they might understand the aforementioned stories were media-driven hysteria. That could lead to two outcomes the gatekeepers would rather avoid.“The reason I’m saying this — there is, of course, a reason we and other news organizations have stopped giving an unfiltered live platform to remarks by former President Trump. It is not out of spite; it is not a decision that we relish; it is a decision that we regularly revisit – and honestly, honestly, it is not an easy decision. But there is a cost to us as a news organization of knowingly broadcasting untrue things.“That is a fundamental truth of our business and who we are. And so, his remarks tonight will not air here live. We will monitor them and let you know about any news that he makes.”
The first: The audience might begin to question the accuracy of the reporting they consume. The second: Listeners might begin to think for themselves instead of relying on the high priests and priestesses of leftist media to tell them what is newsworthy and what is truth. How much of their captive audience would they retain if either of those came to pass?
https://www.libertynation.com/media-gat ... efing-link
surprised the madcow still grunts on teevee...
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime”
LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened."
brown's unheeded words of wisdom 
17 Jan 2024 11:57 am
17 Jan 2024 1:49 pm
MSNBC has been dishonest since its inception. It is a pro-socialist, Left-wing communist propaganda broadcaster. I don't really know what you expect from MSNBC. I mean, just look at their Rotten Tuna poster-child, which says it all......ROG62 » 17 Jan 2024, 12:53 pm » wrote: ↑ MSNBC’s live coverage of the Hawkeye State’s GOP caucus results was replete with updates and factoids; what it did not deign to show, however, was Trump speaking live. In fact, host Rachel Madcow even acknowledged the network has in place an anti-Trump policy when it comes to live newscasts. She was quite open in saying the outlet is not willing to allow the former president to appear unfiltered:
If Trump were of no import, why would the above-the-fold content on MSNBC’s digital site the day after the Iowa caucuses include six out of 13 headlines (46%) focused on him? In fact, if we consider stories that are tangentially about Trump, the figure rises to 11 out of 13 (84%). So, Maddow’s suggestion that his speech was not necessarily newsworthy is clearly false.Her rationale only got worse:
Narrative UnleashedTrump's Trials and Biden's Fall From GraceThe Trump-Russia collusion deception, the “fine people” hoax, the “dictator from day one” nonsense, the “wishing for an economic collapse” delusion. If MSNBC’s viewers could hear an unfiltered Trump, they might understand the aforementioned stories were media-driven hysteria. That could lead to two outcomes the gatekeepers would rather avoid.
The first: The audience might begin to question the accuracy of the reporting they consume. The second: Listeners might begin to think for themselves instead of relying on the high priests and priestesses of leftist media to tell them what is newsworthy and what is truth. How much of their captive audience would they retain if either of those came to pass?
https://www.libertynation.com/media-gat ... efing-link
surprised the madcow still grunts on teevee...
President Biden will usher in a new age of greatness for this country."
"YOUR PENIS SCARES ME!
I DEMAND AN ASSAULT-PENIS BAN"
17 Jan 2024 1:59 pm
Yeah attacking Trump with his own words.ROG62 » 17 Jan 2024, 12:53 pm » wrote: ↑ MSNBC’s live coverage of the Hawkeye State’s GOP caucus results was replete with updates and factoids; what it did not deign to show, however, was Trump speaking live. In fact, host Rachel Madcow even acknowledged the network has in place an anti-Trump policy when it comes to live newscasts. She was quite open in saying the outlet is not willing to allow the former president to appear unfiltered:
If Trump were of no import, why would the above-the-fold content on MSNBC’s digital site the day after the Iowa caucuses include six out of 13 headlines (46%) focused on him? In fact, if we consider stories that are tangentially about Trump, the figure rises to 11 out of 13 (84%). So, Maddow’s suggestion that his speech was not necessarily newsworthy is clearly false.Her rationale only got worse:
Narrative UnleashedTrump's Trials and Biden's Fall From GraceThe Trump-Russia collusion deception, the “fine people” hoax, the “dictator from day one” nonsense, the “wishing for an economic collapse” delusion. If MSNBC’s viewers could hear an unfiltered Trump, they might understand the aforementioned stories were media-driven hysteria. That could lead to two outcomes the gatekeepers would rather avoid.
The first: The audience might begin to question the accuracy of the reporting they consume. The second: Listeners might begin to think for themselves instead of relying on the high priests and priestesses of leftist media to tell them what is newsworthy and what is truth. How much of their captive audience would they retain if either of those came to pass?
https://www.libertynation.com/media-gat ... efing-link
surprised the madcow still grunts on teevee...
17 Jan 2024 6:58 pm
I don't watch it...my expectations are nil...Skans » 17 Jan 2024, 2:49 pm » wrote: ↑ MSNBC has been dishonest since its inception. It is a pro-socialist, Left-wing communist propaganda broadcaster. I don't really know what you expect from MSNBC. I mean, just look at their Rotten Tuna poster-child, which says it all......"America will thrive under socialism.
President Biden will usher in a new age of greatness for this country."
"YOUR PENIS SCARES ME!
I DEMAND AN ASSAULT-PENIS BAN"
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime”
LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened."
brown's unheeded words of wisdom
17 Jan 2024 6:58 pm
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime”
LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened."
brown's unheeded words of wisdom
17 Jan 2024 7:00 pm
I miss the old day when political leaders used to have class. Now we got dumb *** likes MTG Jim Jordan and Trump.
17 Jan 2024 7:05 pm
Nothing says democracy like silencing your political opposition.ROG62 » 17 Jan 2024, 12:53 pm » wrote: ↑ MSNBC’s live coverage of the Hawkeye State’s GOP caucus results was replete with updates and factoids; what it did not deign to show, however, was Trump speaking live. In fact, host Rachel Madcow even acknowledged the network has in place an anti-Trump policy when it comes to live newscasts. She was quite open in saying the outlet is not willing to allow the former president to appear unfiltered:
If Trump were of no import, why would the above-the-fold content on MSNBC’s digital site the day after the Iowa caucuses include six out of 13 headlines (46%) focused on him? In fact, if we consider stories that are tangentially about Trump, the figure rises to 11 out of 13 (84%). So, Maddow’s suggestion that his speech was not necessarily newsworthy is clearly false.Her rationale only got worse:
Narrative UnleashedTrump's Trials and Biden's Fall From GraceThe Trump-Russia collusion deception, the “fine people” hoax, the “dictator from day one” nonsense, the “wishing for an economic collapse” delusion. If MSNBC’s viewers could hear an unfiltered Trump, they might understand the aforementioned stories were media-driven hysteria. That could lead to two outcomes the gatekeepers would rather avoid.
The first: The audience might begin to question the accuracy of the reporting they consume. The second: Listeners might begin to think for themselves instead of relying on the high priests and priestesses of leftist media to tell them what is newsworthy and what is truth. How much of their captive audience would they retain if either of those came to pass?
https://www.libertynation.com/media-gat ... efing-link
surprised the madcow still grunts on teevee...
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
17 Jan 2024 7:37 pm
the libtarded way...RedheadedStranger » 17 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Nothing says democracy like silencing your political opposition.
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime”
LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened."
brown's unheeded words of wisdom 
17 Jan 2024 7:45 pm
https://www.semafor.com/article/03/01/2 ... -aides-sayROG62 » 17 Jan 2024, 12:53 pm » wrote: ↑ MSNBC’s live coverage of the Hawkeye State’s GOP caucus results was replete with updates and factoids; what it did not deign to show, however, was Trump speaking live. In fact, host Rachel Madcow even acknowledged the network has in place an anti-Trump policy when it comes to live newscasts. She was quite open in saying the outlet is not willing to allow the former president to appear unfiltered:
If Trump were of no import, why would the above-the-fold content on MSNBC’s digital site the day after the Iowa caucuses include six out of 13 headlines (46%) focused on him? In fact, if we consider stories that are tangentially about Trump, the figure rises to 11 out of 13 (84%). So, Maddow’s suggestion that his speech was not necessarily newsworthy is clearly false.Her rationale only got worse:
Narrative UnleashedTrump's Trials and Biden's Fall From GraceThe Trump-Russia collusion deception, the “fine people” hoax, the “dictator from day one” nonsense, the “wishing for an economic collapse” delusion. If MSNBC’s viewers could hear an unfiltered Trump, they might understand the aforementioned stories were media-driven hysteria. That could lead to two outcomes the gatekeepers would rather avoid.
The first: The audience might begin to question the accuracy of the reporting they consume. The second: Listeners might begin to think for themselves instead of relying on the high priests and priestesses of leftist media to tell them what is newsworthy and what is truth. How much of their captive audience would they retain if either of those came to pass?
https://www.libertynation.com/media-gat ... efing-link
surprised the madcow still grunts on teevee...
https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/17/politics ... index.html
17 Jan 2024 7:50 pm
CLASSBidencrimefamily » 17 Jan 2024, 8:00 pm » wrote: ↑ I miss the old day when political leaders used to have class. Now we got dumb *** likes MTG Jim Jordan and Trump.
17 Jan 2024 9:36 pm
Bidencrimefamily » 17 Jan 2024, 8:00 pm » wrote: ↑ I miss the old day when political leaders used to have class. Now we got dumb *** likes MTG Jim Jordan and Trump.
17 Jan 2024 9:37 pm
BCF ON PARADE
17 Jan 2024 9:39 pm
17 Jan 2024 10:39 pm
point?
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime”
LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened."
brown's unheeded words of wisdom
18 Jan 2024 6:22 am
Same as always, Rog..
You're a **** idiot.
Nod.
18 Jan 2024 6:29 am
How much FOX do you watch every day, Hole?Z09 » 18 Jan 2024, 7:27 am » wrote: ↑ Ever turn on MSNBC,?
Far left BS non stop
Pee tapes
Russian
"Unnamed sources"
18 Jan 2024 6:31 am
Stated differently; "We will not show anything he says unless we can edit the **** out of it and make it fit into our anti-Trump agenda."ROG62 » 17 Jan 2024, 12:53 pm » wrote: ↑ She was quite open in saying the outlet is not willing to allow the former president to appear unfiltered:
18 Jan 2024 6:31 am
Z09 » 18 Jan 2024, 7:27 am » wrote: ↑ Ever turn on MSNBC,?
Far left BS non stop
Pee tapes
Russian
"Unnamed sources"
Do you object to the use of such, Hole?"Unnamed sources"
Does FOX use "unnamed sources"?
18 Jan 2024 6:33 am
No..ConsRule » 18 Jan 2024, 7:31 am » wrote: ↑ Stated differently; "We will not show anything he says unless we can edit the **** out of it and make it fit into our anti-Trump agenda."
Donald Trump is a delusional imbecile. He has to be muzzled to stop him from whining. He is a disgrace.
Who is online
In total there are 3210 users online :: 14 registered, 16 bots, and 3180 guests
Registered users: Vegas, Blackvegetable, Zeets2, Buck Naked, Buffalo, ROG62, FJB, Beekeeper, jerra b, PhiloBeddo, Lisa 558, nefarious101, Huey, Fuelman
Bots: SiteLockSpider, okhttp, proximic, MicroMessenger, ADmantX, CensysInspect, NING, YandexBot, DuckDuckBot, CriteoBot, Mediapartners-Google, Applebot, facebookexternalhit, bingbot, Googlebot, curl/7