Liberal Forum

R.Suave » 18 Jan 2024, 7:33 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2024, 7:33 am

No..

Donald Trump is a delusional imbecile. He has to be muzzled to stop him from whining. He is a disgrace.

ConsRule » 18 Jan 2024, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2024, 7:46 am

Then you better get word to CNNLOL, MSNBS, et.al. because (from what I have seen and heard) about 90% of their time is spent talking about (attacking) Trump. You would think, after 6+ years they would realize the more they attack him, the more his base rallies around him.  And, before you ask, I consider his "base" to be the people who have vehemently supported him from the time he came down the escalator in Trump Tower.

R.Suave » 18 Jan 2024, 7:56 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2024, 7:56 am

Donald Trump has lost the privilege of Free Speech.

He is so lacking in integrity and decency...

Furthermore, his minions are imbeciles who don't hesitate to engage in acts of senseless violence in his service.
 

ConsRule » 18 Jan 2024, 8:02 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2024, 8:02 am

No...he hasn't.  No matter how much you liberals whine and complain, except as it relates to certain court cases, he retains all his rights.

ROG62 » 17 Jan 2024, 12:53 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 12:53 pm

MSNBC’s live coverage of the Hawkeye State’s GOP caucus results was replete with updates and factoids; what it did not deign to show, however, was Trump speaking live. In fact, host Rachel Madcow even acknowledged the network has in place an anti-Trump policy when it comes to live newscasts. She was quite open in saying the outlet is not willing to allow the former president to appear unfiltered:

If Trump were of no import, why would the above-the-fold content on MSNBC’s digital site the day after the Iowa caucuses include six out of 13 headlines (46%) focused on him? In fact, if we consider stories that are tangentially about Trump, the figure rises to 11 out of 13 (84%). So, Maddow’s suggestion that his speech was not necessarily newsworthy is clearly false.Her rationale only got worse:

Narrative UnleashedTrump's Trials and Biden's Fall From GraceThe Trump-Russia collusion deception, the “fine people” hoax, the “dictator from day one” nonsense, the “wishing for an economic collapse” delusion. If MSNBC’s viewers could hear an unfiltered Trump, they might understand the aforementioned stories were media-driven hysteria. That could lead to two outcomes the gatekeepers would rather avoid.

 The first: The audience might begin to question the accuracy of the reporting they consume. The second: Listeners might begin to think for themselves instead of relying on the high priests and priestesses of leftist media to tell them what is newsworthy and what is truth. How much of their captive audience would they retain if either of those came to pass?

https://www.libertynation.com/media-gat ... efing-link

surprised the madcow still grunts on teevee...

• Overall, Fox News' ratings are almost double that of MSNBC.
• When it comes to covereage of a political event, Fox's ratings are typically more than double that of MSNBC
• A little less than half the nation hates Trump for whatever reason. This is the viewership that MSNBC is going after. 

Skans » 18 Jan 2024, 8:18 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2024, 8:18 am

Great post and I mostly agree with what you've said.  But, I just want to point out a couple of things:

• Overall, Fox News' ratings are almost double that of MSNBC.
• When it comes to covereage of a political event, Fox's ratings are typically more than double that of MSNBC
• A little less than half the nation hates Trump for whatever reason. This is the viewership that MSNBC is going after. 

See, MSNBC knows its place in the media world.  It will never be Fox News. In fact, it doesn't even compete with Fox News.  It competes with CNN.  When you look at MSNBC's rating as compared to CNN, they're killing it.  We have to acknowledge that a little less than half this nation wants to see the media, the DOJ, and Soros Communists destroy Trump.  Destroy Republicans.  And, destroy YOU.  They eat this type of unfair "justice" up.  That's the world we live in.

“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." brown's unheeded words of wisdom

R.Suave » 18 Jan 2024, 7:22 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2024, 7:22 am

Same as always, Rog..

You're a **** idiot.

Nod.

“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." brown's unheeded words of wisdom

ConsRule » 18 Jan 2024, 7:31 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2024, 7:31 am

Stated differently; "We will not show anything he says unless we can edit the **** out of it and make it fit into our anti-Trump agenda."

“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." brown's unheeded words of wisdom

ROG62 » 18 Jan 2024, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2024, 9:01 am

one article cited "unnamed sources" while the other article pertained to a unique, one off situation...

Rupert's ****** son tried caving into his idiotic leftist wife's aspirations of changing FNC to a cnn or msnbc...guess what? It failed miserably...

run...

one article cited "unnamed sources"

Rupert's ****** son tried caving into his idiotic leftist wife's aspirations of changing FNC to a cnn or msnbc...guess what? It failed miserably

R.Suave » 18 Jan 2024, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2024, 9:06 am

what, exactly, is your problem with that?

787 million dollars, the head of TuckTuck..

“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." brown's unheeded words of wisdom