Liberal Forum

ConsRule » 17 Jan 2024, 5:04 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 5:04 pm

I'm reminded of the saying; "Figures never lie, but liars figure."

Vegas » 17 Jan 2024, 5:07 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 5:07 pm

And again ^^^           

​​​​@Skans  I'll give you an example of his ignorance of math. We were talking about his stupid presidential ranking article that he used to push. We got into the discussion about the ranking's use of stats to determine the ranks. There is a particular bias in stats called 'survivorship bias.' I don't expect lay people to know it because it's not a common term used. However, it is a very common term among those who claim to know stats to the degree that he claims. You know how he is. He acts like he knows everything about everything. Therefore, there is no excuse whatsoever that he shouldn't know that term. Well...he didn't think it had to do with data. He thought it had to do with dead people.            I laughed so damn hard.

Skans » 17 Jan 2024, 5:12 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 5:12 pm

We've got some good folks like you on this board who can drill down pretty deep when Democrats heap mounds of manure on top of what they are really saying.  It feels good to hit pay dirt, doesn't it!

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 4:53 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 4:53 pm

Marketing involves statistics...

This is a core MBA requirement..

ECON 216 | STATS FOR BUSINESS & ECON

Units: 4 Repeatability: NoCore Attributes: Quantitative reasoning comp

Prerequisites: MATH 130 with a minimum grade of C- or MATH 133 with a minimum grade of C- or MATH 150 with a minimum grade of C-

A systematic exposure to the issues and problems of applying and interpreting statistical analyses of business situations. Topics include descriptive statistics, probability, random variables and their distributions, statistical inference, multiple regression and residual analysis, correlation, classical time-series models, and forecasting. Extensive computer analysis of data.
 

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 5:15 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 5:15 pm

I've already set it up...all you and   @Skans  have to do is post the formula.

Remember "arithmetic"

Bidencrimefamily » 17 Jan 2024, 4:43 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 4:43 pm

Yeah you gotta watch experts. Maga rely on social media influences that have no expertise.

Vegas » 17 Jan 2024, 5:17 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 5:17 pm

**** liar. You are waiting on me for the answer because you can't do it. You aren't fooling anyone. 

Now shut up.

Vegas » 17 Jan 2024, 5:17 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 5:17 pm

**** liar. You are waiting on me for the answer because you can't do it. You aren't fooling anyone. 

Now shut up.

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 4:48 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 4:48 pm

Begin with the fact that I post my sources, you're too ashamed to.

The arithmetic for figuring out the probability is.....arithmetic. Literally.

Ask ​​​​@Vegas  ....he'll explain it to you.

Bidencrimefamily » 17 Jan 2024, 7:21 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 7:21 pm

They rely on punks on the internet that just make **** up.

Skans » 17 Jan 2024, 4:41 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 4:41 pm

If you are going to re-post some "expert's" comment as the gospel on a subject, then you better do a little checking to make sure that it is not just vapid propaganda riding on the backside of a 3-legged Donkey.

Democrats, like @R. Suave  do this all the time.  A little digging generally uncovers and exposes Democrat "expert analysis" as a whore's raw festering herpes sores in-artfully covered by gobs of Maybelline. 

Try it sometime, with Democrats, this is fairly easy.  

Vegas » 17 Jan 2024, 7:36 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 7:36 pm

@R. Suave  are you going to let him talk about you this way?

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 8:50 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 8:50 pm

Prove you aren't a moron and a loser...

Vegas » 17 Jan 2024, 9:20 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 9:20 pm

Wow. You got me.

Vegas » 17 Jan 2024, 5:16 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 5:16 pm

He doesn't know who he is up against. There are some things that I am not knowledgeable in, thus I don't engage with certain topics. However, there are things that I am knowledgeable in. Thus, I engage. Math is my job. I am not bragging, it's just what I do for a living. I am not an expert at it nor do I claim to be any where near genius level. However, I can hold my own. I know advanced math. He thinks he is an expert at everything and because of that, he gets his *** kicked daily here.

Vegas » 17 Jan 2024, 5:07 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 5:07 pm

And again ^^^           

​​​​@Skans  I'll give you an example of his ignorance of math. We were talking about his stupid presidential ranking article that he used to push. We got into the discussion about the ranking's use of stats to determine the ranks. There is a particular bias in stats called 'survivorship bias.' I don't expect lay people to know it because it's not a common term used. However, it is a very common term among those who claim to know stats to the degree that he claims. You know how he is. He acts like he knows everything about everything. Therefore, there is no excuse whatsoever that he shouldn't know that term. Well...he didn't think it had to do with data. He thought it had to do with dead people.            I laughed so damn hard.

We got into the discussion about the ranking's use of stats to determine the ranks. There is a particular bias in stats called 'survivorship bias.' I don't expect lay people to know it because it's not a common term used. However, it is a very common term among those who claim to know stats to the degree that he claims.

R.Suave » 01 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm

Explain how "Survivorship bias" applies to the survey in question.

Vegas » 01 Feb 2024, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2024, 1:12 pm

Don't turn this **** on me. This is on you, punk. 

If you need me to explain it, then here the stipulations:
1. Acknowledge that you are asking because you need my help.
2. Admit that you don't know. 
3. 5000 greenies. 

Deal with it, narcissist boy.

R.Suave » 01 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm

Explain how "Survivorship bias" applies to the survey in question.