**** off, duck...
There is....I posted it, you're evading it.Vegas » 01 Feb 2024, 3:27 pm » wrote: ↑ You first have to prove that I agreed to your biased judges. Otherwise, there is no question to answer.
1. Define "bias"![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
If it got to judges, regardless of how thoroughly they humiliated you, I MUST have accepted the challenge.Vegas » 01 Feb 2024, 3:40 pm » wrote: ↑ There isn't. Prove I agreed to your biased judges that you DMed to fabricate a ruling against me.
We both know why.
This admits you setting up biased one-sided judges to fabricate a ruling against me. ^^^ In other words, you are admitting to cheating and lying.
Never forget...you're a drooling imbecile....a wheel chock.Vegas » 01 Feb 2024, 3:46 pm » wrote: ↑ This admits you setting up biased one-sided judges to fabricate a ruling against me. ^^^ In other words, you are admitting to cheating and lying.
I win.
QED.
Buh bye.
R.Suave » 01 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm » wrote: ↑ Never forget...you're a drooling imbecile....a wheel chock.
Give it up bitchR.Suave » 01 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm » wrote: ↑ Never forget...you're a drooling imbecile....a wheel chock.
why do contextually governed minds call expert opinions facts instead of gospel when facts are political gospel as scriptures of intellectual spiritualistic facts is to philosophy and religion.Skans » 17 Jan 2024, 4:41 pm » wrote: ↑ If you are going to re-post some "expert's" comment as the gospel on a subject, then you better do a little checking to make sure that it is not just vapid propaganda riding on the backside of a 3-legged Donkey.
Democrats, like @R. Suave do this all the time. A little digging generally uncovers and exposes Democrat "expert analysis" as a whore's raw festering herpes sores in-artfully covered by gobs of Maybelline.
Try it sometime, with Democrats, this is fairly easy.
and what does the evidence clearly show?Vegas » 01 Feb 2024, 3:52 pm » wrote: ↑ LOL. First you take a deal where you had to prove that you are a lying sack of ****.
Then you admitted to cheating on the first challenge from 700 years ago.
You are one dumb piece of ****.![]()
![]()
^^^^skull **** by logic.Then you admitted to cheating on the first challenge from 700 years ago.
500 greenies to dumb it down for you.
LOL! More blatant projections from Mary ^^^That you're a lying sack of **** who doesn't read posts,
Watch: What was your understanding of the deal that you eagerly agreed to?while I answer questions.
fixed it for yourself, not me. Your reality doesn't tolerate understanding how evolving actually happens in plain sight. Your reasonable doubt reality is built speculating nobody understands their time adapting as displaced living eternally separated now as genetically going forward all the time history has misled every generation gap added..
Serving corruption until extinction as usual protecting the idea anything else is possible, tomorrow as living never exceeds evolving forward now, as ancestrally present, one at a time.
I show you I've already done so and you leave for 6 weeks.Vegas » 01 Feb 2024, 4:01 pm » wrote: ↑ 500 greenies to dumb it down for you.
LOL! More blatant projections from Mary ^^^
Watch: What was your understanding of the deal that you eagerly agreed to?
Yeah, you really answer questions, don't you?