R.Suave » 19 Jan 2024, 9:02 am » wrote: ↑ To the bitch flagrantly violating her own rule....
Wait...aren't you the bi....
This is awkward...
91 criminal counts.....Skans » 19 Jan 2024, 9:03 am » wrote: ↑ Every day we show you a new instance of Democrats being crooks. Stop with your F-in excuses, trolling, and smarmy remarks. You and your Democrats are disgusting people - JUST OWN IT ALREADY!
R.Suave » 19 Jan 2024, 9:04 am » wrote: ↑ The photo of them standing, cheek to cheek, should lay to rest any prurient imputations..
MAGAts with Daddy Issues playing out the pre-ordained script?
He certainly doesn't seem to be handling it too well.
No.R.Suave » 19 Jan 2024, 9:08 am » wrote: ↑ MAGAts with Daddy Issues playing out the pre-ordained script?
But I can see why all citations should be suspect...after all, didn't your primary source pay 787 million for lying?
How do you know who is in the top photo?RedheadedStranger » 19 Jan 2024, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑ I already showed that yesterday by doing a side by side picture comparison showing the difference in height.
He blew it off and kept referencing the Vanity Fair Society page "caption" as his proof that it was Trump.
Here are the pics I posted yesterday...
![]()
All you have to do is compare the difference in shoulder height between the two men and wallah... there is all the proof you need.
Of course veggie being the narcissist he is, is incapable of accepting the truth... even when it's staring him right in the face.
I know he'll never admit it, but he knows his case is lost... as does everyone else here.
I'm just keeping it going for laughs at this point.
You know why nobody ever answers your stupid questions Rico?
To clear up the confusion, just post your primary source...Huey » 19 Jan 2024, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑ No.
GO back to my list I told you to save so we could avoid this. I called it. You were still going to bring it up and lie about it.
Why is that question "stupid"?RedheadedStranger » 19 Jan 2024, 9:12 am » wrote: ↑ You know why nobody ever answers your stupid questions Rico?
Because they're stupid.
Your foundering is fun to watch Rico.R.Suave » 19 Jan 2024, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑ Why is that question "stupid"?
Because you found it by searching google....for?
How would google know?
By sight?
R.Suave » 19 Jan 2024, 9:12 am » wrote: ↑ To clear up the confusion, just post your primary source...
Never does.RedheadedStranger » 19 Jan 2024, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑ He certainly doesn't seem to be handling it too well.
Huey » 19 Jan 2024, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑ Nope, because two weeks from now you will go thru this all over again. I told you a few weeks ago that was the last time I was going to do it.
You need to come up with some new diversions.
I remember one time before when you guys just ignored ol' veggieman for like a week.Huey » 19 Jan 2024, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑ Nope, because two weeks from now you will go thru this all over again. I told you a few weeks ago that was the last time I was going to do it.
You need to come up with some new diversions.
I remember that. We did it a couple of times.RedheadedStranger » 19 Jan 2024, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑ I remember one time before when you guys just ignored ol' veggieman for like a week.
He didn't know whether to **** or wind his wrist watch.
91 instances of corruption used by Democrats weaponizing courts for political gain. That's what America sees........................Democrat.
Shrug
It isn't news to me either, Neverrun.