Liberal Forum

RedheadedStranger » 19 Jan 2024, 1:18 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 1:18 pm

It's not my word.

It's photograph evidence.

You were duped. Deal with it.

No...the only photographic "evidence" you've offered has been debunked by more rigorous examination.

On every single point of verifiable fact, you've been wrong.

That just doesn't add up to "Victory"..
 

R.Suave » 19 Jan 2024, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 1:24 pm

No...the only photographic "evidence" you've offered has been debunked by more rigorous examination.

On every single point of verifiable fact, you've been wrong.

That just doesn't add up to "Victory"..

Your delusions are noted.

 
 

R.Suave » 19 Jan 2024, 1:22 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 1:22 pm

No....it's unimpeachable.

Do you accept the terms or not?  A simple yes or no is required.  No narrative.  

Huey » 19 Jan 2024, 1:31 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 1:31 pm

Do you accept the terms or not?  A simple yes or no is required.  No narrative.

The terms are "500 greenies, up front".

Huey » 19 Jan 2024, 1:20 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 1:20 pm

@R. Suave  

Your words:

All up front.

Your credit is no good.

Your honesty is highly questionable.

You will get 250 up front.  You get the other 250 if you correctly choose the answer from the following 2 answer:

It is either :

<

Or >

If the answer is more than one of those two symbols in the post you do not get the other 250.  No narrative, no whining, no try to justify yourself.  Just one symbol or the other.  

Take it or leave it.  At worst you only make 250.

You know he is too dishonest. He will take the 250 and run. I would wait for the whole 500 after. Period. His words are meaningless.

R.Suave » 19 Jan 2024, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 1:40 pm

The terms are "500 greenies, up front".

You forgot the rest of the terms.  Let me remind you:

if you correctly choose the answer from the following 2 answer:

It is either :

<

Or >

If the answer is more than one of those two symbols in the post you do not get the other 250.  No narrative, no whining, no try to justify yourself.  Just one symbol or the other.  

That's why you only get 250 up front and 250 when you give the answer with absolutely no words or narrative.  Just one of those two symbols.  The correct one. 
 

Vegas » 19 Jan 2024, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 1:43 pm

You know he is too dishonest. He will take the 250 and run. I would wait for the whole 500 after. Period. His words are meaningless.

 

Even if he runs away with it we have even more proof of his lack of integrity.  

Huey » 19 Jan 2024, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 1:45 pm

Even if he runs away with it we have even more proof of his lack of integrity.

We already know he has no integrity. 

120 minutes > 70 or 80 minutes. Certain online posters get themselves in trouble by being too emotional/passionate.

Huey » 19 Jan 2024, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 1:45 pm

Even if he runs away with it we have even more proof of his lack of integrity.

He is never going to do it. 
Be it 500 after, 500 before, 250/250...it doesn't matter. 

He shuffles , shuffles, shuffles, and never deals. The guy is a proud coward. 

R.Suave » 19 Jan 2024, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 1:16 pm

I've only "lost" if I take your word over VF's...

That's not going to happen.

Even if Vanity Fair retracted the caption, you STILL wouldn't reverse course.

It's just not in you. 
 

Vegas » 19 Jan 2024, 12:38 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 12:38 pm

 Yes, and he he keeps scratching himself in his 'no-no' area.

His ******?   
 

RedheadedStranger » 19 Jan 2024, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 2:14 pm

Even if Vanity Fair retracted the caption, you STILL wouldn't reverse course.

It's just not in you.

I would....

But until they do, you will continue to deny what is currently known...
 

R.Suave » 19 Jan 2024, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 2:22 pm

I would....

But until they do, you will continue to deny what is currently known...

No you wouldn't... and you and I both know it.

You are incapable of admitting you're wrong.

 

Huey » 19 Jan 2024, 1:44 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 1:44 pm

You forgot the rest of the terms.  Let me remind you:

if you correctly choose the answer from the following 2 answer:

It is either :

<

Or >

If the answer is more than one of those two symbols in the post you do not get the other 250.  No narrative, no whining, no try to justify yourself.  Just one symbol or the other.  

That's why you only get 250 up front and 250 when you give the answer with absolutely no words or narrative.  Just one of those two symbols.  The correct one.

I don't think you understand how this works....

Because you know the answer, I don't have to do anything....and I'll be blameless - hell, even remain UNDEFEEEEETED
 

RedheadedStranger » 19 Jan 2024, 2:23 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 2:23 pm

No you wouldn't... and you and I both know it.

You are incapable of admitting you're wrong.

At this point, who is "wrong"?

R.Suave » 19 Jan 2024, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 2:26 pm

At this point, who is "wrong"?

You are, but you'll never admit it.

The pictures don't lie.

 
 
 Your *** boy is too short to be Trump... but you're incapable of admitting your wrong so... it is what it is.

Now let's get a "because captions!" in 3..2..1...

 




 

R.Suave » 19 Jan 2024, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 2:25 pm

I don't think you understand how this works....

Because you know the answer, I don't have to do anything....and I'll be blameless - hell, even remain UNDEFEEEEETED

Well all know that 120 minutes is greater than 70-80 minutes which means you are incorrect to say I watch 2 hours of programming on FOX each day more than I read.  And the two shows you got your panties in a twist over are not news shows.  On is late comedy and the other is an opinion show. 

This was explained to you but you chose to ignore that by lining it out.  You lose.  And no greenies for you.  You are welcome for the quick tutorial. 

The discussion on primary sources is over forever.  

Huey » 19 Jan 2024, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 12:15 pm

Is 120 minutes (2 hours) < or > than 70-80 minutes?  Our self described math nerd is having issues with that question.

Depends on the location of the person experiencing 120 minutes and the person experiencing 70-80 minutes, and how bad traffic is on the cosmic freeway. 
 

RedheadedStranger » 19 Jan 2024, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 2:32 pm

You are, but you'll never admit it.

The pictures don't lie.

 
 
 Your *** boy is too short to be Trump... but you're incapable of admitting your wrong so... it is what it is.

Now let's get a "because captions!" in 3..2..1...

Not this again.


VF has, roughly, the same circulation as the viewership of FOX, though more skewed to people with teeth, who can read....its parent, Conde Nast, makes about 1.75 billion a year...

There is about zero chance that Grifty was unaware of the movie, and only slightly larger chance that he was unaware of the VF mention.

Were that not he in the photo, he would sue Conde Nast, the author AND the named photographer.

But you don't even have a correction.